Skip to main content

The price of Comity: $15 Billion and Rising

Democrats have controlled the state legislature roughly since the Jurassic Period, while Republicans have had a lock on the governor’s office for the last three terms. This arrangement has benefited two Republican governors, John Roland and Jodi Rell, as well as state legislators, the preponderance of whom are Democrats.

The arrangement also helped former Governor Lowell Weicker, who left the Republican Party to run as an independent governor, in his battle to shove an income tax down the gullet of Connecticut tax payers. Weicker, it will be remembered, won office after having said that establishing an income tax would be like pouring gas on a fire.

Voters of average intelligence supposed at the time that Weicker was averse to the income tax that had been the central pillar of Bill Cibes’ gubernatorial campaign. As it turned out, Connecticut got Weicker, the income tax and Cibes, whom Weicker installed as his Office of Policy Management chief – not, it should be noted, to put out fires.

After the income tax battle was over, all the professional politicians in the legislature and Weicker kissed and made up. Three governors later, the fire rages on. Connecticut’s budget, $15 billion and rising, has more than doubled since the last Democrat governor, William O’Neill, left office. The figure above does not include bonding obligations, about $14.7 billion, a mini budget not included in budget figures.

Such have been the fruits of co-operation and comity between Democrat legislators and so-called “opposing” Republican governors.

George Bernard Shaw once said that every profession is a conspiracy against the laity. His quip would apply to the professional courtesies exchanged between Democrat legislators and Republican governors, Weicker included.

Into this Eden of professional politicians now slithers a snake, several snakes, in fact; for it would appear that some stalwart Republicans – Rell and her aide decamp Lisa Moody not among them – are no longer interested in co-operating with the present regime.

The recent mild mannered opposition of some Republicans to the present regime –represented in the governor’s office by chief of staff Lisa Moody, a notorious compromiser, and other co-operating and co-opted Republicans – gives some reason to hope that the tax and spending freight train that has for years run over the wallets of hard working Connecticut citizens may be derailed.

What Connecticut needs to lift it out of the doldrums is not an attack on sprawl. It does not need the illusion of a regional form of government, the progressive’s answer to strong towns whose citizens have successfully turned away swollen budgets in town referendums. It does not need to send yet one more liberal congressman to Washington, there to be stroked and schmoozed by corrupt beltway earmark king Rep. John Murtha.

What Connecticut needs to prosper in the 21st century is, in no order of importance, a strong principled Republican Party, a fiscally responsible Democrat Party, a statewide referendum to control costs and costly regulations, a ballot initiative that will lure representatives away from reliance on lobbyists and make them responsive to the people they represent, more sprawl (if by sprawl is meant an excess of business activity generated by low taxes and responsible regulation), less comity in the legislature, and a reinvigorated media that has the courage to live up to the journalistic principle stated by Joseph Pulitzer, after whom the coveted Pulitzer Prize is named, that good journalists “should have no friends.”

In the Republican resistance to Moodyism – the tendency to surrender half a loaf of bread to the opposition (soon transformed by muscular negotiation into a whole loaf) in return for crumbs – may be seen the first faint glimmerings of a principled opposition to business as usual.

The dawn begins to break.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p