Skip to main content

Spending, Connecticut’s Real Problem, and the State’s “Surplus”

The reader may have read often in Connecticut’s media of the state’s burgeoning surplus. There are three things that may be done with a surplus of tax funds: 1) The surplus, a tax over-charge, may be returned to taxpayers, much in the way an overpayment may be returned to business customers by non-greedy, non-felonious capitalists; 2) the surplus may be applied to the liquidation of current debt; or 3) the surplus may be used to finance new spending.

 

The Democrat progressive community in Connecticut, operating on the principle that taxes must always increase and never decrease, generally prefers option 3).

 

If a portion of the surplus is used to spur new spending, the accumulative debt in Connecticut will remain the same, and progressives will have asserted progressivism’s abiding central principle: deficit financing is good because a good government needs an ever increasing tax load to finance progressivism. When taxation becomes too obviously burdensome progressives lean towards borrowing money to keep above water the drowning body of a debt-prone government. We’ve all heard the expression “drowning in debt,” usually applied to poor people.  But states may also be impoverished through excessive spending.

 

Borrowing, a politically cheap form of increasing taxes, also ratifies the progressive principle that spending must always increase. Ideally, state debt must remain invisible, and borrowing is a governmental cloak of invisibility to anyone but the professional progressive politician who has learned to fool, in Abe Lincoln’s memorable phrase, “some of the people all of the time.”

 

Slowly, painfully, some of those in Connecticut who have been fooled all the time are beginning to understand that there is no budget surplus in Connecticut.

 

A state surplus is money acquired through excessive taxation when the state’s debt is net zero. Connecticut’s state debt, continuing by leaps and bounds, was about $25.7 billion in 2024, according to state Treasurer Erick Russell. According to CTMirror’s Keith Phanuff, “Surging income and business tax receipts will leave Connecticut with its second-largest surplus in state history, analysts reported Wednesday, even as officials remained divided whether to use any of the $2.3 billion windfall to mitigate big cuts in federal aid.”

 

So then, $25.7 billion minus $2.3 billion leaves us with a debt of $23.4 billion. Repeat: There is no surplus, and the notion that the predictable consequences of indebtedness may perpetually be passed along to children yet unborn is the equivalent of political fool’s gold sold by the ton to a credulous media.

 

According to Truth in Accounting’s Financial State of the States 2024 report, “Connecticut has the dubious distinction of placing last [among 50 states] in our 2023 report. Taxpayers are on the hook for $44,300 each for FY 2023. The total needed from taxpayers [nationally] was $64.9 billion. Connecticut remains in debt in spite of an improvement in its financial condition over last year. The state experienced an increase in revenues over expenses, and a decrease in pension liabilities. However, it moved to last place in TIA’s ranking because New Jersey’s calculated financial position improved. The state must do more to cut its Taxpayer Burden for long-term fiscal health. It remained an “F” state for 2023.”

 

Everyone in Connecticut is pinched, including state businesses. In its annual Survey of Connecticut Businesses 2025, the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA) outlines what might be called a state of the state summary of Connecticut’s economic challenges and business sentiment.

 

The survey collects input from over 2,800 executives across various Connecticut industries, and its bullet points are a series of coffin nails.

 

The Hartford Courant reports on the survey’s findings:

 

“♦More than nine in 10 businesses say the cost of doing business is rising, driven by labor, healthcare, energy, taxes, and compliance costs [the costs incurred through legislative regulations].

 

“♦76% of employers report difficulty hiring and retaining workers, with skills gaps and wage expectations as top barriers.

 

“♦59% say access to affordable, quality child care is important for attracting and retaining employees.

 

“♦Only 12% believe the state’s business climate is improving, while 47% say it’s static, and 40% believe it’s declining.

 

“♦Two-thirds of businesses turned a profit in 2024, 18% broke even, and 15% reported losses — seven points higher than forecasted.’’

 

“For Connecticut to realize its economic potential, the state must address its high costs with policies that convert its strengths into sustained economic momentum,” Chris DiPentima said. DiPentima is “the president and CEO of CBIA, Connecticut’s leading business organization, with thousands of member companies, small and large, representing a diverse range of industries from every part of the state.”

 

The keyword here is “policies.” For the past four decades, it has been the overriding policy of dominant Democrat legislators in the state’s General Assembly to increase state deficit spending and loftily ignore the consequences outlined in the CBIA’s successive reports, while hiding in recent years behind fictional state “surpluses.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

  Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.   In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.   The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."   "Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.   “No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. Th...