Skip to main content

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, a Partisan Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing


People who are truly non-partisan are not likely to take seriously remarks made by arch partisans on the importance of non-partisanship.

 

In a Hartford Courant story printed days after the assassination Charlie Kirk, reporter Chris Keating provides a quote from US Senator Chris Murphy on the assassination of conservative Christian fundamentalist Charlie Kirk:  “’No more glorification or rationalization of violence,’ Murphy wrote on X. ‘I’m not going to pull punches – I think Donald Trump, and his celebration of January 6th, has done more to normalize political violence than any other American. He should apologize and put those people [pardoned rioters at the US Capitol building] back in jail. But some voices on the left celebrated Luigi Mangione. We just need to be crystal clear – and Trump needs to lead – that political violence is unacceptable no matter who pulls the trigger and who is the target. And any perpetrators go to jail, no matter who they support… No new gun law is going to eliminate political violence if we don’t address the root causes, but why not be more careful about giving guns to people who have shown clear signs of brokenness? This surge in political attacks isn’t the only existential threat to our democracy. It feels like our experiment is under threat from multiple fronts. Which is why Democrats and Republicans need to start showing more allegiance to our democracy than to party.’”

 

It‘s a mouthful.

 

There is no indication that January 6th rioters at the US Capitol were political assassins of the same stripe as Kirk’s assassin. And there were no assassinations at the Capitol that in any sense resembled Luigi Mangioni’s assassination of Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare. Murphy’s crystal clarity falls far short of commonplace clarity, which is prone to make clarifying distinctions. Then too, Murphy’s remarks above on gun control represent a sharp political pivot. Connecticut’s stringent gun laws were sold – some would say oversold -- in Connecticut by both Murphy and the state’s senior U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal as an effective means of curbing what both called “gun violence.”

 

On first, second and third sights, Murphy’s usual political pronouncements, many of which trail off into formulaic denunciations of Trump, are not the reflections of a non-partisan politician. Murphy has been, throughout his twelve years in the US Senate, a highly partisan left of center Democrat, a frequent guest at approving media interviews. And he has not been sparing of denunciations of Trump, twice in recent days the target of political assassins, or Republicans who associate with Trump.

 

Trump the demon is never far from Murphy’s thoughts, nor is legislation designed to reduce what Murphy calls “gun violence.” By gun violence Murphy appears to mean violence committed by persons, some of whom are repeat offenders, armed, legally or not, with guns. His reformulated position strikes a new and discordant note: “No new gun law is going to eliminate political violence if we don’t address the root causes, but why not be more careful about giving guns to people who have shown clear signs of brokenness?” One can almost hear Murphy confessing, “Guns don’t kill people. Broken people kill people.”

 

Without a careful examination of “root causes,” one cannot arrive at root solutions to pressing problems.

 

Republican leader in Connecticut Vince Candelora disagrees – non-violently, of course – with Murphy’s highly partisan approach.  Candelora is quoted in the Courant story to provide ideological balance: “’For me, Chris Murphy’s remarks aren’t the starting point on where we should be as a country,’ Candelora told The Courant reporter. ‘I think this issue goes well beyond democracy and political parties. I think this is just a base, fundamental issue of humanity. … We are either at the beginning of a very dark period in our history or this is coming to an end. … While political parties may spar and disagree, we don’t systematically pick up weapons and kill each other because of our speech…To me, it’s not about democracy. It’s not about political parties. … We have a much bigger problem than just our political parties.’”

 

A day prior to the Kirk assassination, Murphy was at his usual political stand delivering his usual left of center anti-Trump message: President Trump is a threat to our democracy, and any means necessary must be used to thwart his designs, all of them, all the time.

 

“You’re not going to convince Donald Trump to stand down in his attempts to destroy our democracy through yes de-escalation politics,” Murphy told former Meet the Press moderator Chuck ToddHO. “Like, that’s just not happening. So, our only opportunity, our only chance to save our democracy, is to fight fire with fire right now. So, yeah, do I believe the fact that, you know, that we’re now blowing up norms? Yes. But literally for two seconds, because if you spend only more than that being sorry for the fact that the old world doesn’t exist, then your democracy is gone.” And here Murphy became self-righteously animated. “Like, we’re in a war right now to save this country. And so you have to be willing to do whatever is necessary in order to save the county.”

 

Truth cannot survive such heated and distorted rhetoric. We are not in a war to save democracy or the country from the ravages of a Hitler, because Trump is not Hitler, and the country is not in the grip of a fascist president. The father of fascism, Benito Mussolini, was once asked to define his Godless creed. He did so in a single phrase: everything in the state, nothing outside the state, nothing above the state. That is not the political credo of the usual conservative Republican. Kirk, a convincing evangelical Christian, was a victim, never an aggressor. He died a victim of the kind of historical darkness that swallowed his brutal assassin in one gulp. Candelora is right: “We are either at the beginning of a very dark period in our history or this is coming to an end.”

 

Pray it may come to an end quickly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...