Skip to main content

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, a Partisan Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing


People who are truly non-partisan are not likely to take seriously remarks made by arch partisans on the importance of non-partisanship.

 

In a Hartford Courant story printed days after the assassination Charlie Kirk, reporter Chris Keating provides a quote from US Senator Chris Murphy on the assassination of conservative Christian fundamentalist Charlie Kirk:  “’No more glorification or rationalization of violence,’ Murphy wrote on X. ‘I’m not going to pull punches – I think Donald Trump, and his celebration of January 6th, has done more to normalize political violence than any other American. He should apologize and put those people [pardoned rioters at the US Capitol building] back in jail. But some voices on the left celebrated Luigi Mangione. We just need to be crystal clear – and Trump needs to lead – that political violence is unacceptable no matter who pulls the trigger and who is the target. And any perpetrators go to jail, no matter who they support… No new gun law is going to eliminate political violence if we don’t address the root causes, but why not be more careful about giving guns to people who have shown clear signs of brokenness? This surge in political attacks isn’t the only existential threat to our democracy. It feels like our experiment is under threat from multiple fronts. Which is why Democrats and Republicans need to start showing more allegiance to our democracy than to party.’”

 

It‘s a mouthful.

 

There is no indication that January 6th rioters at the US Capitol were political assassins of the same stripe as Kirk’s assassin. And there were no assassinations at the Capitol that in any sense resembled Luigi Mangioni’s assassination of Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare. Murphy’s crystal clarity falls far short of commonplace clarity, which is prone to make clarifying distinctions. Then too, Murphy’s remarks above on gun control represent a sharp political pivot. Connecticut’s stringent gun laws were sold – some would say oversold -- in Connecticut by both Murphy and the state’s senior U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal as an effective means of curbing what both called “gun violence.”

 

On first, second and third sights, Murphy’s usual political pronouncements, many of which trail off into formulaic denunciations of Trump, are not the reflections of a non-partisan politician. Murphy has been, throughout his twelve years in the US Senate, a highly partisan left of center Democrat, a frequent guest at approving media interviews. And he has not been sparing of denunciations of Trump, twice in recent days the target of political assassins, or Republicans who associate with Trump.

 

Trump the demon is never far from Murphy’s thoughts, nor is legislation designed to reduce what Murphy calls “gun violence.” By gun violence Murphy appears to mean violence committed by persons, some of whom are repeat offenders, armed, legally or not, with guns. His reformulated position strikes a new and discordant note: “No new gun law is going to eliminate political violence if we don’t address the root causes, but why not be more careful about giving guns to people who have shown clear signs of brokenness?” One can almost hear Murphy confessing, “Guns don’t kill people. Broken people kill people.”

 

Without a careful examination of “root causes,” one cannot arrive at root solutions to pressing problems.

 

Republican leader in Connecticut Vince Candelora disagrees – non-violently, of course – with Murphy’s highly partisan approach.  Candelora is quoted in the Courant story to provide ideological balance: “’For me, Chris Murphy’s remarks aren’t the starting point on where we should be as a country,’ Candelora told The Courant reporter. ‘I think this issue goes well beyond democracy and political parties. I think this is just a base, fundamental issue of humanity. … We are either at the beginning of a very dark period in our history or this is coming to an end. … While political parties may spar and disagree, we don’t systematically pick up weapons and kill each other because of our speech…To me, it’s not about democracy. It’s not about political parties. … We have a much bigger problem than just our political parties.’”

 

A day prior to the Kirk assassination, Murphy was at his usual political stand delivering his usual left of center anti-Trump message: President Trump is a threat to our democracy, and any means necessary must be used to thwart his designs, all of them, all the time.

 

“You’re not going to convince Donald Trump to stand down in his attempts to destroy our democracy through yes de-escalation politics,” Murphy told former Meet the Press moderator Chuck ToddHO. “Like, that’s just not happening. So, our only opportunity, our only chance to save our democracy, is to fight fire with fire right now. So, yeah, do I believe the fact that, you know, that we’re now blowing up norms? Yes. But literally for two seconds, because if you spend only more than that being sorry for the fact that the old world doesn’t exist, then your democracy is gone.” And here Murphy became self-righteously animated. “Like, we’re in a war right now to save this country. And so you have to be willing to do whatever is necessary in order to save the county.”

 

Truth cannot survive such heated and distorted rhetoric. We are not in a war to save democracy or the country from the ravages of a Hitler, because Trump is not Hitler, and the country is not in the grip of a fascist president. The father of fascism, Benito Mussolini, was once asked to define his Godless creed. He did so in a single phrase: everything in the state, nothing outside the state, nothing above the state. That is not the political credo of the usual conservative Republican. Kirk, a convincing evangelical Christian, was a victim, never an aggressor. He died a victim of the kind of historical darkness that swallowed his brutal assassin in one gulp. Candelora is right: “We are either at the beginning of a very dark period in our history or this is coming to an end.”

 

Pray it may come to an end quickly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Casey Chadwick’s Uneasy Life after Death

Casey and her mother Wendy "I just started grief counseling. I'm always sad. I'm sad and in pain and I miss her." Wendy Hartling   Hartling is the mother of Casey Chadwick, murdered in 2015 by Jean Jacques , an illegal Haitian immigrant. Jacques was convicted of the murder of Chadwick in a New London Superior Court jury trial and sentenced by Judge Barbara Bailey Jongbloed to a 60 year term in prison. Since Jacques is 44 years of age, the sentence was, in effect, a life sentence. Connecticut Commentary coverage of the Chadwick murder may be found here , and here   and here . Jacques could not have been sentenced to death because Connecticut’s Democrat dominated General Assembly, under pressure from the state Supreme Court, had abolished Connecticut’s death penalty law in 2012 . The slaughter of Chadwick was particularly brutal. Her body had been found by a friend who, opening a door to a closet, discovered Chadwick stuffed in a dark corner drenched in blo...

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Understanding North Korea Through Dramaturgy

The U.S. military is sending the Vinson Strike Group, including the carrier and two guided-missile destroyers, to operate in the Western Pacific Ocean in response to Pyongyang’s recent missile tests. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, asked about the strike force, issued a terse statement: “The United States has spoken enough about North Korea. We have no further comment.” Is this a post-Syrian bombing mission? Will the US take out North Korea’s missile launching sites, possibly with the unspoken concurrence of China? Never let a bombing go to waste. There are some in the United States who think any such incident should be used to rid North Korea of that runty little totalitarian cock-of-the-walk who keeps his countrymen starved, in fear and at his knees. Since we only have one chance, they say, go for the clean sweep -- no more Kims. Connecticut Commentary is reprinting an earlier piece about the Kims here. Best read with a glass of port.