Skip to main content

Let Us Now Praise Famous Teachers

Andree and Dublin

The events referenced below took place long before educrats, those who couldn’t teach and had made it their life’s work to teach teachers – destroyed education. The names have here been changed to protect both the innocent and guilty.

Mrs. Smith was what once had been known as a “tough teacher” entirely immersed in her subject area, meaning she gave Fs to those of her students who richly deserved Fs, over the protesting cackles of their parents, who imagined their sons and daughters graduating with honors from Yale University.

My mother recalled a call she had received from Mrs. Smith concerning her reproachless, though unawakend, son.

“You know, your boy, Donald, has a lot going for him.”

“Thank you.”

“There is one slight difficulty. I wish he would learn to focus.”

This perplexed Mom, whose furrowed brow Mrs. Smith could nearly see through the phone.

“Focus on what?”

“The important things.”

“Such as?”

“His teacher, his future, life, liberty, and the pursuit of Shakespeare.”

Mom, always super frank, asked, “Is this a crank call?”

She was not the only mother in Connecticut who received phone calls from Mrs. Smith.

But Donald perfectly understood Mrs. Smith. He was a willful, stubborn, dreamy boy, easily distracted, whose saving grace was a sometimes searing sense of humor.

Having noticed that Mrs. Smith had marked several of his papers and book reports with an A over an F, he one day worked up the courage to ask Mrs. Smith what the marking meant.

“The A is for substance,” she said, “the F for presentation, which of course includes misspellings and grammatical errors. I’ve also noticed that you’ve fallen into the bad habit of mispronouncing in oral presentations the word ‘because.’ You say, incorrectly, BEKUZ. But the word should be pronounced BE-CAUSE, as in ‘the cause of.”

She continued, smiling all the while, “I would advise you to read that essay of Karl Kraus’ that says the fate of humankind may well depend upon the placement of a comma.”

Her mild reproach hit Donald between the eyes, as if she had smashed him with a pickaxe, after which – with some help from his father -- he began willingly to focus.

Many years after graduation from a small “teacher’s college,” as it was then known, I wrote Mrs. Smith a tardy note thanking her for her attentions: “Perhaps you do not remember me. You were my best and most challenging teacher. When I arrived at college, I was well prepared for courses and professors far less tough than you, and over the years have written political columns for various newspapers. I am perhaps the only columnist in Connecticut who is well-versed in Karl Kraus.

 Mrs. Smith replied, “Thank you, Mr. Pesci, for your kind note. It pleased me to notice that your spelling and grammar were perfect.”

In 1967, still in college, I married a woman very much like Mrs. Smith.

Andree Pesci graduated not certified to teach. This was a problem. She was legally blind from birth, and administrators thought she could not teach in public schools for this reason. She applied for help to then Governor John Dempsey in overriding the college administrators’ apparently irreversible decision.

Famous, even today, for her disquisitions, Andrée Pesci (nee Descheneaux) explained in vivid, entertaining detail that her college expenses – including books and readers – had been paid by Connecticut’s Lions Club, which had a soft spot in its large heart for the visually impaired; and while in college, she was at the head of her class in all subjects. Among her varied accomplishments, she had directed plays and was a master in her fencing class.

The governor, who had a soft spot in his heart for the Lions Club, was impressed but wrote back, regretfully, there was nothing he could do to override a decision made by college administrators.

Undeterred and set on showing that she could successfully teach students, she was hired to teach English at Saint Mary’s Girls School in Greenwich, Connecticut. She taught there for two years, and wrote again to Dempsey, receiving the same reply.

Then she taught for a year at a Catholic High School in Stamford, and kept the governor abreast. He wrote back – sorry, very sorry, nothing could be done.

She then went on to receive a master’s Degree in American Studies, a fairly new discipline, at Fairfield University and – as the reader will have guessed by now – shared the glad tiding with Dempsey, who waited a week to respond, in a very short note, “Andrée, you win.”

State certification in hand, she was hired almost immediately by Ridgefield High School, where she taught for several years. Few of her students knew she was blind because intellectually brilliant disabled people are adept at hiding their disabilities, and she was raised in a household in which her mother refused to make accommodations or sundering distinctions between her children.

Years after she had left teaching, she received a note from one of her students, now a successful lawyer, that said he was not her best student, but her manner of teaching, always enlivening and masterful, and her insistence that her students should fearlessly embrace their responsibilities, has stood him in good stead.

“I have homeschooled all my children,” he said

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p