Skip to main content

Let Us Now Praise Famous Teachers

Andree and Dublin

The events referenced below took place long before educrats, those who couldn’t teach and had made it their life’s work to teach teachers – destroyed education. The names have here been changed to protect both the innocent and guilty.

Mrs. Smith was what once had been known as a “tough teacher” entirely immersed in her subject area, meaning she gave Fs to those of her students who richly deserved Fs, over the protesting cackles of their parents, who imagined their sons and daughters graduating with honors from Yale University.

My mother recalled a call she had received from Mrs. Smith concerning her reproachless, though unawakend, son.

“You know, your boy, Donald, has a lot going for him.”

“Thank you.”

“There is one slight difficulty. I wish he would learn to focus.”

This perplexed Mom, whose furrowed brow Mrs. Smith could nearly see through the phone.

“Focus on what?”

“The important things.”

“Such as?”

“His teacher, his future, life, liberty, and the pursuit of Shakespeare.”

Mom, always super frank, asked, “Is this a crank call?”

She was not the only mother in Connecticut who received phone calls from Mrs. Smith.

But Donald perfectly understood Mrs. Smith. He was a willful, stubborn, dreamy boy, easily distracted, whose saving grace was a sometimes searing sense of humor.

Having noticed that Mrs. Smith had marked several of his papers and book reports with an A over an F, he one day worked up the courage to ask Mrs. Smith what the marking meant.

“The A is for substance,” she said, “the F for presentation, which of course includes misspellings and grammatical errors. I’ve also noticed that you’ve fallen into the bad habit of mispronouncing in oral presentations the word ‘because.’ You say, incorrectly, BEKUZ. But the word should be pronounced BE-CAUSE, as in ‘the cause of.”

She continued, smiling all the while, “I would advise you to read that essay of Karl Kraus’ that says the fate of humankind may well depend upon the placement of a comma.”

Her mild reproach hit Donald between the eyes, as if she had smashed him with a pickaxe, after which – with some help from his father -- he began willingly to focus.

Many years after graduation from a small “teacher’s college,” as it was then known, I wrote Mrs. Smith a tardy note thanking her for her attentions: “Perhaps you do not remember me. You were my best and most challenging teacher. When I arrived at college, I was well prepared for courses and professors far less tough than you, and over the years have written political columns for various newspapers. I am perhaps the only columnist in Connecticut who is well-versed in Karl Kraus.

 Mrs. Smith replied, “Thank you, Mr. Pesci, for your kind note. It pleased me to notice that your spelling and grammar were perfect.”

In 1967, still in college, I married a woman very much like Mrs. Smith.

Andree Pesci graduated not certified to teach. This was a problem. She was legally blind from birth, and administrators thought she could not teach in public schools for this reason. She applied for help to then Governor John Dempsey in overriding the college administrators’ apparently irreversible decision.

Famous, even today, for her disquisitions, Andrée Pesci (nee Descheneaux) explained in vivid, entertaining detail that her college expenses – including books and readers – had been paid by Connecticut’s Lions Club, which had a soft spot in its large heart for the visually impaired; and while in college, she was at the head of her class in all subjects. Among her varied accomplishments, she had directed plays and was a master in her fencing class.

The governor, who had a soft spot in his heart for the Lions Club, was impressed but wrote back, regretfully, there was nothing he could do to override a decision made by college administrators.

Undeterred and set on showing that she could successfully teach students, she was hired to teach English at Saint Mary’s Girls School in Greenwich, Connecticut. She taught there for two years, and wrote again to Dempsey, receiving the same reply.

Then she taught for a year at a Catholic High School in Stamford, and kept the governor abreast. He wrote back – sorry, very sorry, nothing could be done.

She then went on to receive a master’s Degree in American Studies, a fairly new discipline, at Fairfield University and – as the reader will have guessed by now – shared the glad tiding with Dempsey, who waited a week to respond, in a very short note, “Andrée, you win.”

State certification in hand, she was hired almost immediately by Ridgefield High School, where she taught for several years. Few of her students knew she was blind because intellectually brilliant disabled people are adept at hiding their disabilities, and she was raised in a household in which her mother refused to make accommodations or sundering distinctions between her children.

Years after she had left teaching, she received a note from one of her students, now a successful lawyer, that said he was not her best student, but her manner of teaching, always enlivening and masterful, and her insistence that her students should fearlessly embrace their responsibilities, has stood him in good stead.

“I have homeschooled all my children,” he said

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...