Skip to main content

Chris Murphy and the Morality of Government Regulation

Murphy and Biden -- United Press International

"It profits me but little, after all, that a vigilant authority... averts all dangers from my path... if this same authority is the absolute master of my liberty and my life” -- Alexis de Tocqueville

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for re-election in 2024, has turned his attention to the moral superiority of the regulatory state and “loneliness.”

His ruminations on both appear in a recent story published in The New Republic.

When I” -- Grace Segers, a staff writer at The New Republic – “asked Murphy whether he connected the failures of deregulation to a rise in loneliness, he said that ‘the exercise of regulating the market is the way in which we look out for the common good. When you outsource all morality to the market, and you deregulate every industry, you’re removing an opportunity for us to have a connected conversation about our morals [and] our values,’ Murphy argued.”

It is a pale argument to suppose 1) the U.S. government has been wary of regulation since the publication of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, 2) that regulating the market is the way in which we look out for “the common good,” 3) that morality in the United Sates is “outsourced to a free market,” or 4) that the deregulation of industry “removes any opportunity” we as free citizens may have to discuss among ourselves topics of morality and values.

No one, least of all in the pages The New Republic, has removed Murphy’s opportunity to ostentatiously display his morals and values, and there certainly is no shortage of regulation in the United States.

“Across the U.S.,” U.S. News reports, “state regulations contain 416 million words – more than 23,000 hours' worth of reading – and more than 6 million of those words are regulatory restrictions, or instances of such things as ‘must,’ ‘may not,’ ‘prohibited,’ ‘required’ and ‘shall.’ These rules that make up how states and their industries function aren't equally distributed; some states are home to far more of those regulations than others, according to a recent report from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.”

Forbes reports: “The bottom line is that in today's America, most binding rules come from agencies (unelected) rather than elected lawmakers (emphasis mine).”

“Let's look at year-end 2016 for starters. Federal departments, agencies, and commissions issued 3,853 rules in 2016, while Congress passed and the president signed 214 bills into law—a ratio of 18 rules for every law.”

Such a surfeit of regulation has led some to wonder whether liberty itself is a social good that should not be subject, except under stringent conditions, to the vagaries of unelected regulators. Murphy is among the unconcerned. 

One way not to be lonely is to court a woman, get married, have children and stay married -- preferably in that order. Is it legitimate to ask whether the breakdown of the family – Mom, Dad and 2.5 children, the number of offspring necessary to replace the current population – has anything remotely to do with America’s sense of loneliness and social alienation?

Senator Murphy was not asked by the New Republic’s reporter, what he has done while in office to strengthen any of the “little platoons of democracy,” Edmund Burke’s expression for social institutions that should remain, both de Tocqueville and Burke thought, in a freedom zone safe from ambitious regulators and social reformists with knives in their brains.

There is no such thing as an organic structure imposed by government regulators on a society that radical reformists suppose is in need of fundamental, systemic change. To change liberty’s bloom by attacking its roots is the ambition of every post-French Revolution autocrat in history, particularly fascist and socialist autocrats. All non-organic cultural social structures imposed by central authorities are easily and quickly corrupted. And eventually the corruptors turn to totalitarian measures in order to effect fundamental social change. Neither Tocqueville nor Edmund Burke were advocates of social control through central, government regulation.

National Public Radio tells us that President Joe Biden, chiefly through government regulation, plans “to eliminate fossil fuels as a form of energy generation in the U.S. by 2035. The White House set out a target of 80% renewable energy generation by 2030 and 100% carbon-free electricity five years later. With 79% of total U.S. energy production still coming from fossil fuel sources as of 2021, achieving this goal will require billions of dollars in investments.” Experts, swelling with hubris, tell us the plan is workable.

Murphy is in the service of a President apparently suffering from extreme hubris, which the ancient Greeks, not to mention Shakespeare, denounced as the bitter root of all tragedies. Aristotle tells us “Hubris consists in doing and saying things that cause shame to the victim…simply for the pleasure of it. Retaliation is not hubris, but revenge…Young men and the rich are hubristic because they think they are better than other people.”

Biden is rich, thanks in part to the questionable activities of his son Hunter, and Murphy is young – an explosively hubristic combination.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p