.jpg)
Blumenthal, Schiff, et al
The Daily Caller, a right of center publication founded in
2010 by Tucker Carlson, a 20-year veteran journalist, and Neil Patel, former
chief policy advisor to Vice President Cheney, reports that Twitter executives
have identified Connecticut’s bully U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal as a
congressional troll: ‘Congressional Trolls’: Twitter Execs Bashed
Dem Lawmakers’ Claims About Russian Bot Manipulation.
In a push push, shove shove roundup of congressional
irritants, the Daily Caller notes, “Democratic lawmakers such as California
Rep. Adam Schiff, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Connecticut Sen. Richard
Blumenthal pressed Twitter on claims of Russian bots influencing trends on the
platform. Their source was the Hamilton 68 dashboard created by former FBI
official Clint Watts and the Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), according
to journalist Matt Taibbi.”
Tabbi is the “no respecter of persons” journalist who has
been keeping tabs on Twitter, post Elon Musk, the founder, CEO and chief
engineer of SpaceX; angel investor, CEO and product architect of Tesla, Inc.;
owner and CEO of Twitter, Inc.; founder of The Boring Company; co-founder of
Neuralink and OpenAI; and president of the philanthropic Musk Foundation.
In an effort at transparency, very much resented by
non-transparent congresspersons, Musk lately has been releasing emails that
show an uncomfortably cozy relationship between Trump Hunters and Twitter, now
in the process of a Musk/Tabbi facelift.
Trump, of course, is the former President whose policies,
foreign and domestic, current President Joe Biden and a legion of journalists
have so far successfully reversed. During the great reversal, the U.S. southern
border has been bleached out, Afghanistan and American military machinery has
been returned to the Taliban, Afghani women have been rewound in mandatory chador winding sheets, U.S. energy
products have been short-sheeted, inflation is now singeing the backsides of
pro-Biden progressives, and a recession is bending its boney finger, inviting
us into a future in which it can no longer be doubted that excessive spending has
become a dangerous menace.
Perpetual Poverty Zones
A former fraud investigator for the state of Connecticut
calls the state’s welfare system in urban poverty areas “perpetual poverty
zones.” The Bible tells us, “The poor you will always have with you.” However, Abe Lincoln, poor himself for much
of his short but upwardly mobile life, tells us that the American economic
system has been ingeniously designed in such a way that we should not have the same poor with us all the time.
Among some urban half-families in the poorer sections of our
impoverished cities in which fathers are conspicuously missing, welfare, the
financing of perpetual poverty, is passed along from generation to generation
the way millionaire politicians such as Blumenthal (see above) transfer their
assets, considerable in Blumenthal’s case, to their progeny in their last will
and testaments.
The Dissappeared
Christopher Columbus statuary has become nearly an extinct
species in Connecticut, largely because Columbus is credited with the European
discovery of America – not good
among leftists. And the European discovery of America, persistent and oppressed
critics of the country insist, has been largely overrated by non-woke elementary
school teachers. Patriots, those brought up under the passing ancien régime, have a somewhat different view of the European
settlement, Columbus, and statuary opponents, but – really, who cares about
patriots infected with systemic racism?
Native Americans also are fast disappearing from sports
arenas in the still, somewhat United
States. In the postmodern progressive era now oppressing us, the very name
“Indian,” a miscue from Columbus, is disparaged as an indicator of “systemic
racism.” One begins to wish that the word “systemic” should be expunged from
the American tongue, somewhat like Columbus, never again to be injected into a
discussion. The hidden purpose of the word “systemic” as used in postmodern
political discourse is to cut short discussions pretty much in the way a cutthroat stops his victims from
useless protestations. Lenin, in his more rumbustious moods, used to say: If
you label a thought or a person effectively, you no longer have to argue with
it, or him, or her … or whomever.
Grammarians who object on grammatical grounds to the new
miasma of pronouns circling our political polemics like outer space junk need
not be answered at all, if it is at all possible to discredit grammar itself as
“systemic” oppression, for what can be more oppressive than clear and
unambiguous language. George Orwell makes all the necessary points on the
subject in “Politics
and the English Language.”
The word “Indian” and all its various iterations is, school children
now are taught, a form of rancid systemic “racism,” another power word with
sharp elbows.
Comments