Skip to main content

McGee’s Protest

Trenee McGee

The temptation is to treat state Rep. Trenee McGee’s protest as a “man bites dog” story. That may be a serious error in judgment. It is always possible she knows more about inner city life than most tourist politicians and media savants.

McGee, a Black state representative in West Haven’s 116th District, “replaced Rep. Michael DiMassa, who stepped down after an FBI investigation led to charges of stealing more than $600,000 in federal COVID-19 relief money by billing the city of West Haven for pandemic-related consulting services that federal officials said he never performed,” according to a report in a Hartford paper.

Her maiden speech on the floor of the state House of Representatives during an abortion debate in April surprised nearly everyone.

McGee said she wanted to serve as a spokesperson for the urban Black community in Connecticut. Abortion, she said, has been “destructive to my community.” She wanted to “speak the fearless truth” about inequitable abortions in minority communities.

“My journey and quest for racial justice when it comes to reproductive rights began in a classroom with Black girls who knew about abortion when they were 7 years old and were taught in their classrooms about abortion,” she recounted.

“They were taught about abortion as a birth-control method. They were taught that, at any point in time, when they were 13 or 12 or 15, they can go to a Planned Parenthood and receive an abortion without their parents knowing. This differed when I traveled across the state as a teaching artist, and I went into the suburbs, where there were young white girls who had access to all sorts of preventative methods, as well as even organizations that helped them to transition their births to their adoptive parents.”

And then she brought down the hammer: Black women, she noted, never had problems with access to abortion. Abortion clinics are within “walking distance of our middle schools and our homes.”

A Policy Report on “The Effects of Abortion on the Black Community” from the Center for Urban Renewal and Education tells us “Dis-proportionally, the leading consumer of the abortionists’ services is the African-American female. According to the 2011 Abortion Surveillance Report issued by the Center for Disease Control, black women make up 14 percent of the childbearing population, yet obtained 36.2 percent of reported abortions. Black women have the highest abortion ratio in the country, with 474 abortions per 1,000 live births. Percentages at these levels illustrate that more than 19 million black babies have been aborted since 1973.”

The Policy Report notes that a “recent study released by Protecting Black Life, an outreach of Life Issues Institute concluded that, ‘79% of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are strategically located within walking distance of African and/or Hispanic communities.’”

Such figures do not make white women in wealthy privileged suburban communities flinch with indignation, but they are felt within urban Black communities across the nation. And a felt experience, we all know, is more convincing that abstract numbers.

McGee’s speech was exceedingly polite. A more ardent Black pro-lifer might have noted that birth control was promoted early on in the movement by Margaret Sanger as a method of reducing the burden of unwanted poor people, mostly Blacks, but also poor Whites, given to the mindless production of excess offspring.

"We do not want word to go out,” Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, said about her 1939 Negro Project, “that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Black ministers whom Sanger, a eugenicist, wanted to recruit to her cause had to be gently persuaded, the recruitment message over-larded with moral molasses – not too difficult since the inferior races were, well, inferior.

It didn’t work then and, McGee suggested, it won’t work now.

McGee’s pro-life speech was delivered in response to a Democrat bill supported by Governor Ned Lamont that sailed through the Democrat dominated General Assembly prior to the Supreme Court decision reversing Roe v Wade. Ten members of the legislature’s Black caucus voted against the bill, never a hopeful sign. The Lamont-pro-abortion law will increase the number of medical professionals allowed to perform abortions in Connecticut, provide a safe haven for women seeking abortions from more restrictive states, and expand abortion-related protections regarding lawsuits.

McGee, the daughter of two ministers, is well spoken, and her anti-abortion speech, regarded as courageous on both sides of the political divide, was not peppered by opponents with twitter-like denunciations of the speaker.

The Democrat list of successes under President Joe Biden is thin. Connecticut Democrats are hoping they can fashion a recent Supreme Court ruling that returns decision making on abortion back to the states into a political campaign shoehorn. McGee’s message is – it won’t work, not in a Black urban community that loves children and, even in a state supported Babylonian captivity, can hear the whisper of God in the whirlwind.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p