Skip to main content

Blumenthal Does Natural Gas

Blumenthal

The title of the story in the Hartford paper was, “Consumers are struggling with rising home heating prices. Senators want to halt US exports of natural gas,” and the lede graph was, “A group of U.S. senators, including Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, is targeting natural gas exports as a culprit behind rising prices and asked the Biden administration to halt the shipments.”

Years ago, when Blumenthal was running against Linda McMahon’s $50 million campaign chest – not a high hurdle for Blumenthal to surmount – McMahon asked Blumenthal during one of their debates to tell everyone how he thought jobs were created.

Blumenthal banged about for a while in the economic china closet, breaking most of the expensive gold monogramed pieces, until he was driven out by McMahon.

“Mr. Blumenthal,” Connecticut Commentary noted at the time, “proceeded to rattle off at great length his crony capitalist talking points, prominent among them that governmental intervention – i.e. the picking and choosing of winners and losers in what remains of the U.S. free market system -- is indispensable in the creation of jobs: ‘… We can and should create more of them [jobs] by creative policy, and that’s the kind of approach I want to bring to Washington.’ Never fearful of patting himself on the back, Mr. Blumenthal explained that as Attorney General he had ‘stood up for jobs when that company [Pratt&Whitney] wanted to ship them out of state and overseas… I want programs that provide more capital for small businesses, tax policies that promote creating jobs, stronger intervention by government to make sure that we use the ‘made in America’ policy and ‘buy America’ policy to take jobs here, rather than buying products that are manufactured overseas…”

“Mrs. McMahon, cutting through the campaign blather, patiently explained how a job is created: ‘Government, government, government – government does not create jobs. It’s very simple how you create jobs. An entrepreneur takes a risk; he or she believes that he creates a good or service that is sold for more than it costs to make it. If an entrepreneur thinks he can do that, he creates a job.’”

This was, many commentators might agree, the high point of McMahon’s $50 million lost campaign for the U.S. Senate.

Natural gas, we all know, is important to New England, which suffers harsher winters than, say, Florida. And natural gas has become expensive – “dear,” as wealthy senators living in the gold plated nest egg of Greenwich, Connecticut might say, not that too many of them are spooked by the price of natural gas used by the lower orders to heat their homes during frigid New England winters or the price of energy in general.

Prices have gone up on natural gas and other commodities because inflation forces prices upwards, the classic definition of inflation being: too many dollars chasing too few goods. When demand is high and products and services are scarce, inflation, a hidden tax that reduces the purchasing power of the dollar, kicks in.

Energy prices in Connecticut have increased, among other reasons, because the supply was restricted when President Joe Biden shut down the nearly finished, fully financed Keystone pipeline running from Alberta to Nebraska. At the same time, the fracking industry was crippled by other Biden restrictions, further reducing the supply of energy to the US.

Blumenthal has not yet been asked to offer a definition of inflation, as earlier he was asked by McMahon to explain how jobs were created.

Inflation, which boosts prices and lowers the purchasing power of the dollar, is a VERY big deal, although the onset of inflation affects the poor and middle classes more severely than the rich. Blumenthal, this writer has mentioned several times, is the eighth richest U.S. Senator in Congress.

At the close of the second week in February, the Connecticut paper most frequently consulted by Blumenthal’s staff reported, in a front page below the fold Associated Press story, “Inflation in the US jumps to 40-year high.”

“Shortages of supplies and workers, heavy doses of federal aid,” the paper disclosed, “ultra-low interest rates and robust consumer spending combined to send inflation leaping in the past year.”

But not to worry overmuch. The inflation “hammering American consumers, wiping out pay raises” has “reinforced the Federal Reserve decision to begin raising borrowing rates across the country,” the traditional emetic for high inflation.

So then, the shortage of workers has in part been caused by over generous doses of federal aid to states intended to ameliorate the predictable consequences of business shutdowns caused by political decisions made by governors. The rise in energy prices had been caused in part by a restriction in the supply of natural gas, caused by an anti-fossil fuel, pro-green energy administration.

And Blumenthal’s answer to frigid, cost-conscious New Englanders is… what? He wants to divert natural gas exports from countries other than the United States to New England, reasoning that the diversion will increase supply to New England and fulfill demand, reduced politically by vote counting US politicians, a near perfect example of vote hungry politicos purporting to solve the problems they themselves have caused.

Blumenthal is careful to state that OF COURSE he realizes his solution will solidify support in much of Europe for Vladimir Putin, now attempting to become the number one supplier of natural gas to energy hungry Europe. Blumenthal hopes other US politicians will warm to his notion, despite the geopolitical cost to Ukraine and NATO countries.

Perhaps Blumenthal should instruct his staff to ring up McMahon before votes are counted in the upcoming 2022 elections so that she might explain to him how the free enterprise system really works.  


Comments

Unknown said…
Two years ago we were energy independent. Today we import petroleum and natural gas from Russia. Who is Putin's puppet?
With respect to natural gas and electricity here in Nutmegistan, I had missed this report
on Biden's approving of an ISO New England plan to block a proposed gas power plant in Killingly. Just fyi, in case you had missed it, too.
============

The Biden administration approved a plan to block a new natural gas power plant that would’ve powered 500,000 homes from being built in Connecticut.
https://dailycaller.com/2022/01/05/joe-biden-administration-federal-energy-regulatory-commission-new-england-natural-gas-plant/

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...