Skip to main content

The Emergency Has Become A Money Pot


“I think this is the only path forward. It is the right thing to do. ... Ultimately, it allows parents to make that final choice”
– State Senator Rob Samson on the question “Who should decide?”

Let’s begin with the obvious.

COVID and its variants, each succeeding variant more contagious but far less fatal than its predecessor, is not an emergent medical problem. It has been with us on the front pages of our newspapers for two years, approximately 730 days. We are old enemies. Here in Connecticut, “science,” such as it is, has prompted the state to redraw its battle lines.

Many stores no longer requiring masks have pulled themselves back from the economic brink. The emergency powers of Governor Lamont, more than 20 as Connecticut entered its first year of the pandemic that originated in China, a hostile communist, authoritarian regime, have been trimmed considerably. All the indicators, both in the United States and Europe, suggest that COVID has now become manageable – to be treated in the future as have other flu-like viruses.

In what sense is a non-emergent medical problem an emergency?

Governor Ned Lamont’s numerous executive orders have now been reduced to two, a positive sign on the part of the Lamont administration that the emergency is no longer emergent.

The reduction of emergency powers leads us to several questions, some of which have not been addressed openly in the court of public opinion, since news generating public hearings on issues of grave importance to Connecticut have been one of the many casualties of the shutdown of the General Assembly.

Why now? Why are most executive orders headed for the ashcan of history now?

Chris Keating of the Hartford Courant, a longtime reporter who has managed to avoid being submerged into the Coronavirus political sewer pipe or the attendant  political whirlpool, writes in a February 11 story, “House extends emergencies to guarantee federal money, “After a sometimes passionate debate, state legislators voted Thursday afternoon to extend two emergencies so that the state can continue to receive more than $50 million in critical federal funds.”

The debate lasted two hours and the two money making measures passed on a party line vote. The vote was necessary because Lamont’s emergency powers were due to expire on February 15.

As in all debates in the General Assembly, both sides of the issue up for discussion -- should mask mandates in schools lapse along with the bulk of the governor’s extraordinary powers? – were represented by different legislators, a welcomed return to normalcy.

Arguing in favor of continuing the state’s masking policy in schools was Middletown Democrat State Senator Matt Lesser, who pointed out that a measure before the Senate rejected by Republicans that would continue a masking policy in schools “does not grant the governor any powers. We are reclaiming the legislature’s authority ... We all want the pandemic to end. We are all exhausted.’’

Lesser’s party also rejected “an amendment Monday that would have allowed parents — rather than school boards or the governor — to make the final decision on whether individual students wear masks in school.”

Both the Governor and Democrats in the General Assembly had already let fall from Lamont’s iron plenary grip decision making powers that now reverted to municipalities. Decisions that previously had rested entirely with Lamont would now be made by the municipal governing authority, with one notable exception. The decision on the question – to mask, or not to mask -- would remain with a General Assembly dominated by Democrats that adamantly refused to allow parents to decide whether their children should be forced to wear masks at a time when many important scientists had agreed that the prophylactic utility of masks had been, so to speak, greatly exaggerated.

Concerning the utility of masks, the “yes, no” meandering pronouncements issued over the years by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s chief COVID policy enforcer, suggests, at the very least, that so called “science” – the last refuge, some think, of authoritarian scoundrels – had not affirmed Fauci’s  politically shifting dicta.

And somewhere along the line, woke parents noticed that “science” was being used by master politicians to sanction dubious policies, a realization that  has flowered, among other places, in Boards of Education meetings, even in quiet, austere, go-along-to-get-along Connecticut.

Tempers are not so much flaring as changing in Connecticut. There is a cleavage in the question – should young children be forced to wear masks in schools? – that has not sufficiently been appreciated by politicians.

Two questions, not one, have been presented to Connecticut parents. Question one: Should children in, say, K-8 be forced to wear masks, given the changes that have occurred in the “science” of COVID from 2020 to 2022? And question two: Who is best able to decide the issue, a parent familiar with the quirks, medical and otherwise, of their child, as always in consultation with the child’s doctor, or a remote bureaucrat, state or national, irrationally and unscientifically committed to a one-size-fits-all solution to whatever ails us, medically or politically?

The answer to the second question is now being played out in Boards of Education meetings across Connecticut. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...