Skip to main content

The Biden-Sanders Budget and the Politics of Envy

Biden and Sanders

The Biden budget, and its ever changing proposals to tax billionaires, has been called by some the “Sanders’ Budget.” That designation is not farfetched.

Sanders is a socialist, not a progressive. He hasn’t changed at all from his early years. Sanders spent his honeymoon in Moscow, when it was not yet clear that the Soviet Union was economically in disarray. He visited Nicaragua and there rubbed socialist shoulders with the Ortega brothers. He never sharply criticized the Castro brothers after they had thrown into prison their ideological opponents. The socialism of the Soviet Union, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Cuba are all rooted in the politics of envy. It is what Friedrich Nietzsche use to call “ressentiment” that gives life to both socialism and communism.

Nietzsche divided mankind into two classes: masters and slaves. The world is best governed, he thought, by aristocrats. Their superiority always engenders ressentiment among the slave class.

But Nietzsche, like Karl Marx a poet of the coming 20th century, did not foresee that ressentiment may in a government of former slave turned masters flow downward to aristocrats as well, because ressentiment, as the concept was understood by Nietzsche, is part of the human condition. Once the slave has become a master, the resentment of the former slave rules his heart and mind un-aristocratically.

The principal lesson of the 20th century is that the slave become ruler is a much more vicious character than the aristocrat of previous centuries whose rule may yet be benevolent. Stalin, in other words, was much more menacing than, say, the aristocratic Borgias who ruled 12th century Florence. Dante, a true Florentine republican, was exiled by the Borgias, but the ruling elite did not send all republicans in Florence into reeducation camps. It was Stalin, the progressive communist, who expanded the Soviet re-education camps described by Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his Gulag Archipelago.

The notion that the federal government should propose programs the costs of which are to be borne entirely by billionaires is a step beyond progressive-socialism. It trespasses into communism. And, of course, the central pillar that upholds such economic absurdities is made of fairy dust. The Sanders-Biden budget, which vastly expands spending – this while the US economy is yet frozen in a recessionary embrace -- cannot and will not be borne by billionaires alone.  

The Sanders-Biden budget is teetering and tottering in the US Congress. This socialist budget plan -- backed by “moderate” President Joe Biden, “moderate” Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, “moderate” US Senate leader Chuck Schumer, and self-proclaimed “progressives” such as former barkeep Alexandra Ocasio Cortez of New York and Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts – if it passes, will simply cripple the US economy.

The reason is simple: whatever you tax tends to disappear. If you impose a punishing confiscatory tax on billionaires, billionaires will disappear, usually in a puff of magic accounting smoke; if you tax profits, the use that is made of profits – improving and expanding both products and the labor used to produce products and services – will disappear. Creativity, the motivating force that lies at the center of inventive capitalism, will disappear as well.

But the ressentiment of the new masters will not disappear.

Though crowds of socialist slaves in Cuba and Venezuela today are crying out for deliverance from their relentless communist masters, their desperate cries will not reach the ears of Sanders, a hardboiled socialist, or the “moderate” Biden administration, now on its way to Scotland, there to confer with hardboiled European leaders watching in astonishment as hundreds of thousands of the victims of South American socialist states pour over a semi-permeable border effectively dismantled by a President who needlessly surrendered Afghanistan to a terrorist organization, whose domestic policies have boosted inflation and caused a labor shortage by entrapping workers into taxpayer-financed quasi-socialist reservoirs from which they are not likely to emerge any time soon. Both the costs of goods and services and the costs of labor in the United States will be boosted by the progressive Biden-Sanders inflationary budget.

These rising costs, in tandem with ever increasing debt, will in the future impose upon the US Middle Class – not the rich – an insupportable burden that will lead, as Friedrich Hayek warned in his prophetic book, The Road to Serfdom, to a severe contraction in personal liberty.

In a chapter titled “The ‘Inevitability’ of Planning,” Hayek quotes socialist-fascist Benito Mussolini on the point: “We were the first to assert that the more complicated the forms assumed by civilization, the more restricted the freedom of the individual must become.”

Biden, we are told by the Facebook and Twitter suppressed New York Post, “is sending 13 senior administration officials and cabinet members to next month’s UN climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland… a show of force, the White House said, to show the US is working lockstep with their allies.”

Perhaps some well-wisher might be good enough to supply the group with copies of Hayek’s book.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...