Skip to main content

Will Blumenthal Bail On Biden?

Blumenthal and Murphy

The upcoming elections should be brutally lucid.

During the last non-presidential election, Democrats in Connecticut successfully ran against President Donald Trump, who was not even on the ballot. Republicans could not move during the anti-Trump, non-presidential elections without confronting interrogations concerning Trump’s fitness to serve as President.

President Joe Biden, who may become the Donald Trump of the upcoming elections, has been seriously wounded by his political actions -- which always speak louder than words -- on the now permeable US southern border; the closure of the nearly completed US-Canadian XL energy pipeline, a servile bow to the environmental lobby; the Presidential sprint to plunge the nation into a post-Coronavirus recession; and most recently Biden's loss of Afghanistan to untrustworthy Pashtun Taliban pirates.

The President's approval ratings have tumbled since he began waving the white flag of surrender in Afghanistan, and the mud side is beginning to take its toll on frayed Democrat nerves. Real Clear Politics polling on the “direction of the country” shows Biden falling headlong off an approval cliff.

In coming campaigns, when Biden Democrats are up for re-election, we will know whether the Taliban tiger has changed its stripes – not likely. For the moment, the prospect of an American President leaving behind Taliban lines American civilians and/or Afghanis who had helped the United States to keep the peace in the country for 20 years is causing sweat beads to form on the placid brows of the seven all-Democrat members of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation.

U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal, for one, has said he does not favor a withdrawal of American troops in Afghanistan until it is certain all Americans have left the sole airbase Biden has not yet surrendered to the Taliban. But Blumenthal, alas, is not Biden, who fully intends to satisfy the Taliban non-negotiable demands that remaining American troops must leave Afghanistan by Biden’s self-enforced withdrawal date of August 31.

Neither Blumenthal, nor Biden, nor reporters at the New York Times, know how many Americans and Afghan military helpers are now present in the country hunkering behind the perimeter the Taliban has thrown around the Kabul airport; therefore, Blumenthal cannot know whether such people will escape murderous Taliban land pirates before the sword of Allah falls on their necks.

Blumenthal does know that Taliban spokespersons, less proficient in double-talk than Pentagon chatterboxes or Democrat political operatives associated with Biden, have said that NO Afghans will be permitted to leave the Taliban stronghold after August 31.

Pretty much everyone, minus Democrats who believe that Biden will be the progressive salvation of the Democrat Party, agrees that the withdrawal was misconceived. This is not the way losers should leave the field to winners. Even the Soviet exit from Afghanistan in 1989 was more orderly, honorable, and far less embarrassing, than the Biden rout. The Pentagon has yet to tote up a final dollar accounting of US armaments left to the Taliban, likely in the billions.

The capture of one Black Hawk helicopter in a 1993 battle in Mogadishu, Somalia produced extensive negative publicity, a book and a passable movie, Black Hawk Down. In his haste to get out of Dodge, Biden has rewarded the Taliban – a name he consistently mispronounces – with at least 45 Black Hawks, made by Sikorsky Aircraft in Stratford Connecticut. The Pentagon Generals misadvising Biden tell us that the helicopters are inoperable.

Ha! Nothing made in Connecticut” is inoperable save its General Assembly, on account of Coronavirus we’ve been told.

The Pashtuns of Afghanistan, 42% of the population, are Taliban. Historically, Iran and the Pashtuns share the same language, and there are many Pashtuns in Pakistan, where Osama bin Laden took refuge before he was assassinated by the Obama-Biden-Clinton administration. These are ties that bind and repel. And the Taliban, fierce fighters, do not suffer fools gladly.

No one, least of all Blumenthal, a Marine himself, should have been surprised when eleven  U.S. Marines were recently blown to bits by enterprising ISIS warriors near the Kabul airfield surrounded by Taliban fighters. Pentagon generals had told us that ISIS was not in Afghanistan. But they are there, in sufficient numbers to kill Marines who cannot now defend themselves because their Commander-in-Chief is anxious to fulfill a campaign pledge far in advance of the upcoming elections.

It is generally supposed that American voters will have filed the American humiliation in Afghanistan in their memory's back drawers by the time elections roll around, well past the August 31st date of withdrawal. Americans, said Henry Adams, never solve their problems; they simply amicably “bid them goodbye.”

Connecticut’s two Democrat U.S. Senators, Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, are counting on such memory lapses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e