Skip to main content

Is The Honeymoon Over Yet?

Biden in Afghanistan

It is painful to put the matter in such blunt terms, but the United States has lost Afghanistan to the Taliban, and no amount of lipstick on the pig can change the nature of the loss.

Good, some may respond, 20 years rolling the rock up Noshaq, the second highest point in the whole of the Hindu Kush Ranges, elevation 24,580 feet, only to see it roll down again, is enough.  Prometheus’ shoulders are sore. He is bone weary.

In a White House statement on Afghanistan, President Joe Biden, attempting to plaster the pig with misleading rhetoric, put it this way: “One more year, or five more years, of U.S. military presence would not have made a difference if the Afghan military cannot or will not hold its own country. And an endless American presence in the middle of another country’s civil conflict was not acceptable to me. “

While Vice President in the Barack Obama administration, Biden had born patiently the “endless American presence” in Afghanistan. He and the Obama administration winked at the assassination of Libya’s intolerable dictator, the eccentric Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, hunted down by the hound dogs of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton chuckled.

Unlike the Taliban, Gaddafi appeared to have been cooperating with American demands before he … er… died. Considerable collateral damage followed. Obama’s U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, was murdered in a subsequent assault on the American Embassy and compound in Benghazi, pretty much wiping the smile from Clinton’s face. Asserting at the time the attack was the result of a “spontaneous demonstration,” Clinton later shed a tear over the tortured corpse of Obama’s personal representative in Libya.

The U.S. military has been present in Korea since 1948 -- 73 years, without causing heartburn to Biden, though the 15 bases in South Korea must gall the present administration.

“When I came to office,” Biden wrote after his so called “exit plan” had flopped, “I inherited a deal cut by my predecessor [emphasis mine] — in which he [Trump] invited the Taliban to discuss at Camp David on the eve of 9/11 of 2019—that left the Taliban in the strongest position militarily since 2001 and imposed a May 1, 2021 deadline on U.S. Forces. Shortly before he left office, he also drew U.S. Forces down to a bare minimum of 2,500. Therefore, when I became President, I faced a choice—follow through on the deal, with a brief extension to get our Forces and our allies’ Forces out safely, or ramp up our presence and send more American troops to fight once again in another country’s civil conflict. I was the fourth President to preside over an American troop presence in Afghanistan—two Republicans, two Democrats. I would not, and will not, pass this war onto a fifth.”

The default excuse for any and every embarrassing mistake made by Biden during his protracted honeymoon with a largely uncritical American media is -- Trump made me do it.

Trump made Biden open American’s southern border to border jumpers; Trump made Biden lard his transportation initiative with millions in what used to be called, during the bad old days of Tammany Hall, “walking around money,” tax money used indirectly to purchase votes; Trump made Biden support a socialist inflation producing Bernie Sanders budget; Trump made Biden shut down a Canada-American pipe line that would assure environmentally safe passage into the United States of relatively low cost energy; Trump made Biden support an end to an electoral college that, since revolutionary times, had provided equitable representation in the halls of Congress for both large and small population centers; Trump  made Biden propose Supreme Court packing.

Every political reversal executed by Biden during his unending honeymoon with a media that has forgotten its mission has been heaped on the Trump scapegoat – including the dramatic failure of Biden’s Commander-in-Chief responsibilities that has led to an inescapable doom scenario in Afghanistan.

Concerning the putative “deal” struck between Trump and the Taliban, it should be noted that a preliminary agreement setting the terms of a final deal between the Taliban and the Afghan government is very different than a concluded peace arrangement.

“Biden can go only so far in claiming the agreement boxed him in,” The Associated Press reported recently. “It had an escape clause: The U.S. could have withdrawn from the accord if Afghan peace talks failed. They did, but Biden chose to stay in it, although he delayed the complete pullout from May to September.”

The “deal” was a fruitful negotiation the resolution of which remained unresolved after Trump had left office. The purpose of the condition-based negotiation was to pressure the government of Afghanistan into a power sharing arrangement with the Taliban. That negotiation, never completed, was inherited by the Biden administration as a condition based effort that could be repudiated or enhanced by the incoming Biden administration.

Some European leaders are cackling with laughter at the Biden fiasco in Afghanistan. Biden must be held responsible for the decisions Biden makes.

We know from countless examples furnished by history what happens when one party in a military struggle prematurely announces, incorrectly, that he has lost the struggle and proceeds to negotiate surrender terms with the victor.

All Biden's chess pieces, in the absence of a resumption of hostilities, have now been swept from the board.

Is Biden's long uninterrupted honeymoon over yet? And why on earth haven't Blumenthal or Murphy or the five other members of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation, all Democrats, been grilled, as they should be, by Connecticut's media?

Comments

Unknown said…
To answer your question: The media substituted vetting Biden for hatred of everything Trump. No media outlet questioned shutting down the Keystone pipeline. No media questioned Biden's abhorrent border policy. Go back 50 years. No media questioned Biden's claim that a drunk trucker killed his then wife. No media questioned his unholy relationships with Delaware banks. I could go on....!

Biden has been a lying, corrupt political pig feeding at the public trough for 50 years and his reward was landing the most powerful position in the world. Now that all his decision making failures are visible for the world to see, perhaps it is time for the media to notice that this pretend emperor really has NO clothes....!

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p