Skip to main content

The Political Manipulation of Coronavirus “Science”


Dr. Fauci

There are signs that we in Connecticut are approaching the outer boundaries of the Coronavirus pandemic. A couple of weeks ago, Governor Ned Lamont was crying from the rooftops that we should all get back to work – pronto. Lamont, some thought, was holding up the last hoop through which much of Connecticut, brought to a grinding halt by gubernatorial work stoppages, must jump so that our economically crippled state might pass over from penury to its accustomed prosperity. Connecticut’s post pandemic economy, Lamont said, was like a coiled spring.

As is the case with most governors, Lamont may have a bit of a problem filling open jobs now that the spring has sprung. A good many potential workers are caught in the trap-gate of a compassionate rescue operation that pays many workers more in salaries and benefits than they might receive if they were to get back to work --pronto.

The state’s “fundamentals” are strong, and Connecticut’s so called “Gold Coast,” now inundated with deep-pocket New Yorkers fleeing Governor Andrew Cuomo’s overtaxed and overregulated dystopia, continues to produce state treasury gold. Connecticut is awash in financing and hedge fund money, although there are many progressives in state government who would drain the entrepreneurial surplus through wealth taxation. Lamont has made it clear that he is not in favor of killing the golden goose that has for decades produced Connecticut’s golden eggs.

Then too, President Joe Biden has offered generous assistance in the form of grants to states that had suffered job losses because governors, armed with plenary powers, had shut down businesses for more than a year.

Facemasks, regarded as Coronavirus prophylactics during the plague year, also appear to be on their way out, thanks to a combination of natural immunity and immunity provided by what some irreverent Republicans are now calling “the Trump vaccine.”

The Coronavirus onion is in the process of being peeled, and many in the nation are now comfortable in asserting that the pandemic didindeed issue from a lab in Wuhan, China.

The devil is in Dr. Anthony – “Tony,” to his close associates -- Fauci’s recently released emails. When a definitive history of the Wuhan Virus is written, Zero Hedge may get a journalistic gold star. Assuredly, the publication will never receive a Pulitzer.

A research paper circulated early in the pandemic, "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts on the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag,” quickly and quietly withdrawn under pressure, provided scientific evidence that Coronavirus had been produced experimentally in the now notorious Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The early politically inconvenient research paper was not – to put it very politely – welcomed news within a politically insulated “scientific” community determined to cast doubts that Coronavirus was a lab manipulated virus most likely originating in Communist China. The early research paper, Zero Hedge disclosed in a recent story, “posited that segments of the virus's RNA had no relation to other coronaviruses such as SARS, and instead appeared to be closer to HIV." And, in April of last year, “Dr. Luc Montagnier - winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008 for ‘discovering’ HIV as the cause of the AIDS epidemic - claimed that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.”

The early paper caused some trepidation in Fauci-land, Fauci writing to National Institute of Health (NIH) immunologist Dr. Barney Graham that the paper was “really outlandish.”

Later in May, Zero Hedge reported, “The plot thickened further as a study by Chinese scientists published in May 2020 found that the novel coronavirus uses the same strategy to evade attack from the human immune system as HIV.

And still later in June, “British professor Angus Dalgleish - best known for creating the world's first 'HIV vaccine', and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen - chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, who has published 31 peer-reviewed papers and holds several patents, wrote that while analyzing virus samples last year, the pair discovered ‘unique fingerprints’ in the form of ‘six inserts’ created through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.”

The two scientists also concluded that “SARS-Coronavirus-2 has ‘no credible natural ancestor’ and that it is ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that the virus was created via ‘laboratory manipulation,’” not at all a comforting finding that supported political rather than the “scientific” findings of Fauci and those close to him.

Early in May 2020, Fauci told National Geographic, “'If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what's out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated … Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species,’ Fauci says. Based on the scientific evidence, he also doesn’t entertain an alternate theory—that someone found the coronavirus in the wild, brought it to a lab, and then it accidentally escaped.”

Real science is beginning to steal a march on – please forgive the Trumpism – fake or highly politicized science. It may take some time for journalism to catch up to all the political dissimulation, but the newly released cache of Fauci emails should speed truth seekers on their way.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p