Skip to main content

Manners and Politics in the Age of Trump, and the End of Brazenness in Connecticut

Nancy Pelosi

Your mother used to tell you, whenever you slipped out of your groove, “Watch your manners!” And Bill Buckley reminds us that the trouble with bad manners is that they sometime lead to murder.


Manners have taken a beating in modern times. Some, mostly bad mannered Democrats, will place the devolution of manners on Trump alone, but the death of manners has been a long time coming. Good manners have died  the death of a thousand cuts.

Twice Speaker of the U.S. House Nancy Pelosi and President Donald Trump have been kicking each other in the shins for the entirety of the Trump administration. Now Trump has fallen ill with Coronavirus, which looms large in the Democrat imagination, right up there with the Black Death. Pelosi, about whom her daughter once said “She’ll cut your throat, and you won’t even know you’re bleeding,” has invited us all to pray for the President’s health, according to an Associated Press story.

What curses the lady may have uttered in private is, of course, a matter between herself, her conscience and her God, but people who pay attention to Pelosi’s solicitudes will have noticed that the lady added to her prayer what the lawyers would call a codicil, caught in the title of the AP story: “Nancy Pelosi says she’s praying for Trump and hopes COVID-19 infection might be ‘learning experience.’”

“This is tragic. It is very sad. Let us all pray for the President’s health,” Pelosi said on MSNBC. Though she had been at arm’s length from the president both ideological and socially, Pelosi said she had been tested for Coronavirus “from a sense of caution” and was awaiting the results of her test.

Despite the planted axiom, it is unlikely Pelosi could have contracted Coronavirus from personal contact with Trump. In a spirit of Christian charity and good manners, let us pray that her tests will prove negative.

Pelosi, political considerations arising in her breast, could not forbear a warning that it was Trump’s “brazen behavior” that allowed “something like this to happen.”

“Brazen behavior” is, of course, a reference to Trump’s disinclination to being masked on all public occasions. Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden, who has hunkered down and avoided clamorous rallies since his nomination, is not similarly afflicted with brazenness.

And Governor Ned Lamont, Connecticut’s Coronavirus Czar, is the very opposite of brazen, as understood by Pelosi. One can easily imagine him wearing a mask in the shower. Among Democrat politicians in Connecticut, mask wearing has become a ritualistic virtue on a par, in former days, with abortion denunciations.

Lamont has threatened nutmeggers with substantial fines should they go unmasked in public, imposed self-quarantine on travelers entering Connecticut from Coronavirus afflicted states, which all but destroyed business at Bradley International Airport, closed all schools in Connecticut – although school closure is still a work in progress – cut the clientele of restaurants in the state by half, and reduced job production in Connecticut by 33 percent in the last reported quarter.

But Lamont religiously wears his mask on public occasions when watchful reporters are present. To be seen in public without a mask is, for Democrat politicians, a viler crime than to be seen exhorting taxes from Connecticut’s tax beleaguered public, or condemning African American children in cities to an inferior education by opposing successful charter schools, or perversely refusing to acknowledge the connection between coronavirus policies and the state’s economic nose dive.

Connecticut’s economy shrank by nearly one-third in the spring as businesses closed during the worst of the coronavirus” a headline in a Hartford paper screeched as October opened.

“Screeched” may be the wrong word -- well then, “whispered.” One does not expect to find the “one-third” figure featured prominently in media releases issued by Czar Lamont, whose plenary powers, recently extended for an additional five months by a rump legislature dominated by Democrats, allows the governor to adjust economic factors at will, introducing the demon of uncertainty into the state’s faltering economy.  Connecticut journalism, sycophantic as usual towards Democrat progressives and the party in power, is roughly 10 percent thought and 90 percent repetition, and damaging figures of this kind will not be repeated in future stories.

Trump has conceded a point on mask wearing to his critics. “I get it,” the President wrote in a tweet remarkably free of invective. It is doubtful whether the mask wearing Lamont yet “gets” the connection between his state’s faltering economy and his own plenary edicts.

A recent business survey undertaken by the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA) shows only one-fourth of the 6,600 firms surveyed expect to see growth in sales in the next year. Two thirds, according to a Hartford paper, “said they foresee a drop in orders and sales this year because of COVID-19 disruptions and fewer than half expect a return to profit this year. The CBIA called that a ‘historic low’ in its annual survey.”

But the eupeptic Lamont senses a bottom beneath this bottom. Asked about the survey results, Lamont enthused, “… the economy will never come back if public health is not front and center. The business community, he said, "knows we’re still in a COVID economy and they’re somewhat hesitant.”

Actually, they are hesitant to remain closed in accordance with Lamont’s shifty dictates.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p