Skip to main content

Invitation to an Execution

David Collins

Columnist and Staff Writer of The Day David Collins has invited Republicans and Democrats running for office in Connecticut to submit to his paper a couple of lines in praise or condemnation of the much belabored President Donald Trump.

There has been in the Day, editors of the paper surely will note, a cataract of critical articles on Trump. Nearly all Associated Press, Washington Post and New York Times stories on Trump have been fiercely oppositional. Stories on Trump’s Democrat competitor in the presidential race, Hunter Biden’s father Joe, have been soft-shoe criticisms.

So called “moderate” Republicans in Connecticut who are not predisposed against Trump might, for very good reasons, decline the Collins invitation.

In his invite, Collins brashly flourishes his own anti-Trump flag: “Alas, the president, now fresh from what he calls a miracle cure of COVID-19, has been doing his best all year to undermine confidence in the process and the outcome of the election, trying to kick another leg out from under our democracy, accelerating attacks on our institutions and allies.”

Collins has not solicited two sentences about the head of the Democrat ticket – Why soil the pages of the Day with praise or condemnation of the Democrat presidential nominee and former Vice President under President Barack Obama? – because “Biden hasn't been a norm-breaking president for three years. Even Trump supporters will admit their candidate has changed the presidency. He's a phenomenon of American politics who has brought us to a new brink, good or bad, depending on whether you plan to vote for him and his remake of the Republican Party.”

Not every Republican will agree that Trump has “remade” the Republican Party. Trump’s economic policies mirror those of former President John Kennedy. See Kennedy’s speech to the New York Economics Club.

National Review, a reliable barometer of Republican conservative opinion, operates more or less on the assumption that the Republican Party may well survive even two Trump terms in office.

The notion that the walls of the Republic could not survive eight years of a Trump presidency is, largely, Democrat Party campaign fodder. The Republic survived the Civil War, a test, in the words of President Abraham Lincoln, of the durability of constitutional liberty. The Republic and both major parties survived largely Democrat Jim Crow laws, the rise of the Klu Klux Klan following Reconstruction in the post-Civil War South, two brutal World Wars, Vietnam, Abby Hoffman, Jane Fonda and Senator John Kerry, the “Winter Soldier” from Massachusetts.

An invitation from Collins to Connecticut editorial writers to submit to the Day two lines in praise of Trump might have been more instructive and entertaining.

“Please,” Collin’s writes, “if you are on the ballot here in eastern Connecticut, send along two sentences with your thoughts about four more years of Trump.

“Kindly keep it short and sweet, about 14 words in all. Two sentences should allow room for making separate points. Devote one to Biden if you like. Send them along by Monday.

“We'll publish them all, as long as they are within the newspaper's guidelines for suitability for family reading.”

Collins understands that Republican candidates for office “are generally reluctant to comment about the candidate at the head of their ticket” and, in what amounts to a call to arms, he adds, “If you are a Republican voter, don't let them get away with this,” i.e. the failure of Republican candidates for office to respond to the Day’s invitation. “If you are [a] Trump supporter, demand that the candidates say what they think about a second Trump term.”

In previous columns, Collins has said plainly what he thinks about Trump’s first and possible second term in office. Last July Collins wrote that he had “given up on finding Connecticut Republicans on the ballot this fall who might renounce the divisive hater at the head of their ticket…There’s still a lot of campaign time left for Connecticut Republican candidates to explain their support of the racist, divisive, mean-spirited candidate at the head of their ticket, a president who seems more interested in his own reelection than safeguarding America, from our enemies abroad or the virus consuming us at home.

“Any of you who are finally ready to renounce, call me.”

Two comments published below in response to Collins’ most recent op-ed may help explain why Republican candidates for office may be a little reluctant to place their necks on the chopping block. One commentator writes: “Vote every (R) out of office at the local, state and federal level for their complicity in supporting 45 without ever condemning his racist, misogynistic, traitorous crime syndicate,” and another “Anyone who hasn't denounced the Madman already is complicit.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e...