Skip to main content

A Conversation With My Mother’s Ghost On Savior Politicians


The Mom my Father Married

Anyone who knew Rose Pesci will tell you that she was a straight shooter, and she was not shy of firing at people who, she determined, needed to be taken down a peg, a service she often performed for a multitude of family members and the general run of humanity.

Me: Too bad about all the statuary desecration in Connecticut, eh?

Mom: Right. Not only are the barbarians at the gate; they are everywhere, at our lunch tables, in our basement furnaces, in our confessionals, under our beds …

Me: You left us before Coronavius arrived at Connecticut’s door step, a gift from China and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. In that sense, I suppose it can be said you escaped a garbage bin of political nonsense.

Mom: Death has its uses. There’s no doubt in my mind that some of these politicians,  much more shameless today than they were in my time, would be willing to dig me up and put a “died of Coronavirus” tag on my toe bone if they thought they might by such means  get a few more votes.

Me: In my dreams, I sometimes hear your voice talking about events of the day, as you sometimes did in life. Last night you were cursing Governor Ned Lamont’s travel sequester on states in which Coronavirus tests have spiked. One of your sons, your grandsons and daughters, and numberless members on your side of the family, have fled south, and Lamont’s fourteen day sequester will affect all of them. In the dream I had, your hackles on the sequester were very much up.

Mom: Dream? What makes you think the voice you heard came from a dream ghost rather than a real one? Was Banquo, Macbeth’s murdered conscience, a dream ghost or a real ghost in Shakespeare’s play?

Me: Let’s leave Shakespeare and his ghosts aside and “move on", as the college professors say. Is Lamont’s idea – that persons traveling by plane into Connecticut from more than a dozen states in which increased testing has demonstrated a spike in possible Coronavirus infection, certainly not permanent  -- a good or a bad idea?

Mom: It’s a bad idea, because it’s not an idea. It’s a half-baked thought, entirely a political measure proposed by a gang of politicians who all along have been using Coronavirus to gin-up votes. I call them “savior politicians.” They intend now to save us from problems they themselves had a hand in creating. In Connecticut and New York, more than 60 percent of Coronavirus associated deaths occurred in nursing homes suffering from gubernatorial neglect.

Among incumbent politicians, the political trade has now become a secular religion. Columbus statues must be destroyed not because Columbus was demonic, but because he has become an emblem of heretical-thought and, as such, must be demonized. J. K. Rowling must be denounced not because she feels a certain fealty to proper English usage – only women can menstruate; therefore, the expression “people who menstruate” is what Mark Twain might have called a “stretcher” – but because, if she insists on gender differences, she cannot represent the tip of the sword of the transgender movement. These progressive prohibitions are religious heresies carried over into our anti-religious, secular cults. Sacrilege in the progressive movement simply cannot be allowed. To dissent from a progressive catechesis is sinful. Rowling is not wrong about proper linguistic usage. She is an unrepentant sinner. Prepare the stake!

Me; Well, that’s an interesting theory…

Mom: No, it is not a theory. It is the truth. You see, here is the problem with the whole cursed 21st century -- it mistakes real ghosts for dream ghosts and truth for theory. And, of course, it mistakes theory for truth as well. To bring our discussion back to Lamont and savior politicians, more numerous among us than swarms of mayflies in May, the notion that Coronavirus can be contained by forcing plane passengers to self-sequester for 14 days when they arrive in Connecticut is a half-baked, ill-considered theory.

And the theory is grounded in a misreading of human nature. People are not automatons; they are wonderfully wrought packages of spirit, will and thought.

Let’s suppose you are considering a plane trip to Connecticut from one of the states targeted for “voluntary sequestration.”

These are your options: You may cancel your trip and, if it is a business trip, conduct business by internet means.  If the trip is for pleasure, visiting family members for reasons politicians may consider inessential – presence during a funeral or a graduation or a wedding or a church service, all considered as inessential by most secular political saviors – you may cancel your trip. These two options will not greatly inconvenience politicians who hope to contain Coronavirus through forced-sequestration of those who travel to Connecticut from one of the blacklisted states on Lamont’s list.

But here is where will and thought and spirit enters the stage, much to the dismay of politicians who regard the human person as a lump of moldable clay. You may adopt some other mode of transportation to escape Governor Ned Lamont’s irritating intrusion into your private affairs by a) taking a bus, b) taking a train, c) arriving by auto or d) deplaning at an unmonitored airport and renting a car for travel to Connecticut. And what will happen if, in the future, the states on Lamont’s growing list retaliate against Connecticut, requiring its citizens to self-sequester for 14 days before enjoying the company of family members who have left Connecticut to escape the prehensile clutch of progressive politicians?

The Lamont travel bucket, it ought to be obvious to anyone with a brain, has massive holes in it. Why does Lamont not suppose that these political interruptions will be returned tenfold by impacted states? The all-important practical question is -- does the Lamont prophylactic work?

Answer: It does not and cannot. It has too many holes in it.

Progressives are not likely to notice any of this when they lay their plans for their future utopias because progressives truly think there is only one possible result from any political action – the result they desire. And that is what is wrong with progressivism; it makes no provision for unintended consequences. The progressive solution to a problem invariably 1) fails to settle the problem, 2) introduces new complexities, and 3) satisfies only politicians in the long run.

This November, people who are not automatons but rather thinking, willing, spiritual human beings will be able to settle many of their pressing problems by voting the bums out.

That would be my suggestion.

Me: I really do appreciate our bi-monthly visits Mom.

Mom: Ah! You see! Visits, not dreams of ghosts! Real ones! Rowling would be proud of you.


Comments

MrsL9512 said…
Sweet, Don. A very special mother. You were blessed while she was with you, and even now in your thoughts and memories.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p