Skip to main content

Connecticut’s Economic Sniffles

 


So then, how is Connecticut doing now that the state appears to be recovering partially from “the Coronavirus pandemic?”

That formulation, the reader should be warned, is imprecise. Economically, the state is suffering from an acute business slowdown – actually, a recession – caused by decisions made by Governor Ned Lamont, not the pandemic itself, an unelected Coronavirus panic that has made no political decisions.

Connecticut is not doing that great really. Fewer people are buying newspapers. They’re too expensive and too thin. But anyone can glean at no charge more than a fistful of distressing  headlines from Capitol Report, an aggregator site not yet operating under a firewall.

We all knew the bill for Lamont’s gubernatorial edict-caused business shutdowns would come due at some point. The bill collector now is banging on our doors, and the state predictably is running out of funds. No surprise there; labor costs in Connecticut have long exceeded the state’s ability to pay, and the shutdown has naturally clipped revenues.

Some cynics, growing more numerous by the day, suppose that the shutdown itself -- punishing sequesters, and the state’s accelerating spin into impoverishment -- will convince a battered public to accept the dismal prospect of further future taxes. The Democrats’ toll proposals died on the vine, but that was before Coronavirus seeped from Wuhan, China, through Governor Andrew Cuomo’s New York, into what used to be called, before the Lamont shutdowns, Connecticut’s Gold Coast.

Since that time, stubborn New Englanders, softened by possible unconstitutional gubernatorial edicts that direct their every movement, may have become more pliant. They are told go and they go, come and they come, sequester and they sequester. Their nerves and confidence shattered, they are now putty in the hands of reigning New England Caligulas, Governors Cuomo of New York, Lamont of Connecticut, and Phil Murphy of New Jersey.

Two branches of the country’s vaunted separation of powers, the useful constitutional arrangement that is supposed to temper the unbridled power of the chief executive, have been sawed off. And so there is no check on the arrogance of Lamont here in the once revolutionary state of Connecticut. The state’s motto, “The Constitution State”, has been put into a museum, closed of course, along with slaughtered Christopher Columbus statutes. The second branch of Connecticut’s government, the General Assembly, is still in a state of Coronavirus shutdown, and its third branch of government, the state’s courts, also are suffering from Coronavirus anemia.

Here is a story plucked from today’s (7/17/2020) thin, firewalled Hartford Courant: “Connecticut added 73,300 jobs in June, repairing some of the damage to the labor force caused by the coronavirus,” an uplifting headline. But the good news is soon dashed in the first three paragraphs:

“Connecticut employers filled 73,300 jobs in June, the biggest employment gain ever as the state’s labor force, badly damaged by the coronavirus, begins to mend, the state Department of Labor reported Thursday.

“’Connecticut saw the largest single month gain in jobs on record in June,’ said Andy Condon, the Labor Department’s research director. ‘However, this gain has to be viewed from the perspective of the unprecedented job losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.’

“The labor force is still down nearly 173,000 jobs since June 2019. In the first two weeks of June, the Department of Labor reported processing more than 19,000 claims for unemployment insurance.”

And remarks in the story made by Economist Don Klepper-Smith of DataCore Partners, an expert often cited in Courant business reports, further deflated limping spirits.

Klepper-Smith indicated that “Connecticut will not exit the downturn easily. Data show a ‘formidable recession’ over the next year with losses and periodic gains, he said in an email.

“'Recessions don’t unfold over days or weeks, but months and years,’ Klepper-Smith said.”

Indeed, the average length of a Connecticut recession is about ten years, at which point our anti-business-businessman governor may have retired to “Lamont’s 2nd home far off the beaten path” in North Haven, Maine.

The proprietor of Connecticut Commentary, yours truly, sent up his flagpole the selfsame warning earlier in July: “It is perhaps unpragmatic at this point to hope that businessman Lamont and the Democrat leaders in the General Assembly will realize that Connecticut’s economy, artificially sustained by President Donald Trump’s military hardware acquisitions and the Wall Street casino, is weak at its core and will be further weakened by unnecessary shutdowns. Businesses lost to the Lamont shutdowns are irrecoverable, and there is yet another ten year recession grinning evilly at the state from the political wings,” pearls of wisdom wasted on unhearing progressive politicians.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e...