Skip to main content

Connecticut’s Economic Sniffles

 


So then, how is Connecticut doing now that the state appears to be recovering partially from “the Coronavirus pandemic?”

That formulation, the reader should be warned, is imprecise. Economically, the state is suffering from an acute business slowdown – actually, a recession – caused by decisions made by Governor Ned Lamont, not the pandemic itself, an unelected Coronavirus panic that has made no political decisions.

Connecticut is not doing that great really. Fewer people are buying newspapers. They’re too expensive and too thin. But anyone can glean at no charge more than a fistful of distressing  headlines from Capitol Report, an aggregator site not yet operating under a firewall.

We all knew the bill for Lamont’s gubernatorial edict-caused business shutdowns would come due at some point. The bill collector now is banging on our doors, and the state predictably is running out of funds. No surprise there; labor costs in Connecticut have long exceeded the state’s ability to pay, and the shutdown has naturally clipped revenues.

Some cynics, growing more numerous by the day, suppose that the shutdown itself -- punishing sequesters, and the state’s accelerating spin into impoverishment -- will convince a battered public to accept the dismal prospect of further future taxes. The Democrats’ toll proposals died on the vine, but that was before Coronavirus seeped from Wuhan, China, through Governor Andrew Cuomo’s New York, into what used to be called, before the Lamont shutdowns, Connecticut’s Gold Coast.

Since that time, stubborn New Englanders, softened by possible unconstitutional gubernatorial edicts that direct their every movement, may have become more pliant. They are told go and they go, come and they come, sequester and they sequester. Their nerves and confidence shattered, they are now putty in the hands of reigning New England Caligulas, Governors Cuomo of New York, Lamont of Connecticut, and Phil Murphy of New Jersey.

Two branches of the country’s vaunted separation of powers, the useful constitutional arrangement that is supposed to temper the unbridled power of the chief executive, have been sawed off. And so there is no check on the arrogance of Lamont here in the once revolutionary state of Connecticut. The state’s motto, “The Constitution State”, has been put into a museum, closed of course, along with slaughtered Christopher Columbus statutes. The second branch of Connecticut’s government, the General Assembly, is still in a state of Coronavirus shutdown, and its third branch of government, the state’s courts, also are suffering from Coronavirus anemia.

Here is a story plucked from today’s (7/17/2020) thin, firewalled Hartford Courant: “Connecticut added 73,300 jobs in June, repairing some of the damage to the labor force caused by the coronavirus,” an uplifting headline. But the good news is soon dashed in the first three paragraphs:

“Connecticut employers filled 73,300 jobs in June, the biggest employment gain ever as the state’s labor force, badly damaged by the coronavirus, begins to mend, the state Department of Labor reported Thursday.

“’Connecticut saw the largest single month gain in jobs on record in June,’ said Andy Condon, the Labor Department’s research director. ‘However, this gain has to be viewed from the perspective of the unprecedented job losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.’

“The labor force is still down nearly 173,000 jobs since June 2019. In the first two weeks of June, the Department of Labor reported processing more than 19,000 claims for unemployment insurance.”

And remarks in the story made by Economist Don Klepper-Smith of DataCore Partners, an expert often cited in Courant business reports, further deflated limping spirits.

Klepper-Smith indicated that “Connecticut will not exit the downturn easily. Data show a ‘formidable recession’ over the next year with losses and periodic gains, he said in an email.

“'Recessions don’t unfold over days or weeks, but months and years,’ Klepper-Smith said.”

Indeed, the average length of a Connecticut recession is about ten years, at which point our anti-business-businessman governor may have retired to “Lamont’s 2nd home far off the beaten path” in North Haven, Maine.

The proprietor of Connecticut Commentary, yours truly, sent up his flagpole the selfsame warning earlier in July: “It is perhaps unpragmatic at this point to hope that businessman Lamont and the Democrat leaders in the General Assembly will realize that Connecticut’s economy, artificially sustained by President Donald Trump’s military hardware acquisitions and the Wall Street casino, is weak at its core and will be further weakened by unnecessary shutdowns. Businesses lost to the Lamont shutdowns are irrecoverable, and there is yet another ten year recession grinning evilly at the state from the political wings,” pearls of wisdom wasted on unhearing progressive politicians.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...