Skip to main content

The #MeToo Movement, Blumenthal And Biden

Blumenthal

When Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, an unwilling witness, was persuaded to come out of the closet and give public testimony concerning her allegations that then Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh had molested her decades earlier, U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal was among the first out of the gate to credit what turned out to be a poorly supported allegation.

The authors of a 2019 book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation”, noted that a high school friend of Ford’s who, Ford testified, was at the party where the alleged assault took place initially stated that, while she did not recall the evening in question, she never-the-less believed Ford’s claim of sexual assault by Kavanaugh. The author’s interview of the testifier revealed that her friend, a Democrat who was not in the same room during the alleged assault, had felt pressured to corroborate Ford's account. Ford herself was pressured to make an appearance before the investigation committee.

From the very beginning of the Kavanaugh rough-up, Blumenthal strongly asserted he believed Ford’s allegation. Elle magazine caught Blumenthal in full stride: “He [Blumenthal] said, ‘Thank you for being here today and just tell you (sic) I have found your testimony powerful, incredible – Blumenthal perhaps meant to say “credible” -- and I believe you. You’re a teacher, correct? Well, you have given America an amazing teaching moment, and you may have other moments in the classroom, but you have inspired and you have enlightened America. You have inspired and given courage to women to come forward as they have done to every one of our offices and many other public places. You have inspired and you have enlightened men in America to listen respectfully to women survivors and men who have survived sexual attacks. And that is a profound public service, regardless of what happens with this nomination. And so the teachers of America, people of America, should be really proud of what you have done.’"

One can only hope that Blumenthal was relying upon the evidence supporting the claims made by Ford and not Ford’s gender as the spur to his ardent belief. Competent lawyers believe or do not believe in testable claims, not persons; if the bulk of evidence supports the claim, it becomes possible for others to believe it. Certitude arising from claims is conditioned on evidence-backed propositions, not gender. Had someone argued at the time that one should believe Kavanaugh’s protestations of innocence because he was a judge whose rulings had inspired a corresponding courage in other judges, Blumenthal would rightly have raised the roof.

The central operational pillar of the #MeToo movement is this: that in any claim of molestation or rape made by a woman against a man, the claim, as yet untested, should be given serious consideration and, if found to be true, one must justly credit the claim. Recently we have seen this pillar of moral rectitude brought down upon the shoulders of Democrat financier and Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, among others. And we should all be proud of the courageous women who hauled Weinstein into court, where he was judged guilty by a jury of his peers. That judgment, rendered by a jury that carefully considered the evidence presented at trial, vindicated the claims made by some of his accusers Naturally, appeals will follow until Weinstein’s coffers run dry.

The Kavanagh accusations – which filled the media 24/7 for weeks – rested on slender evidence, and some of the accusations were hilariously fictitious. The accusation brought by former Biden aide Tara Reade against her former boss is not insubstantial. “It happened all at once, Reade recounted in an interview with Kaite Halper “The gym bag, I don’t know where it went. I handed it to him. It was gone and then his hands were on me and underneath my clothes. And then he went down my skirt, but then up inside it, and he penetrated me with his fingers. And he was kissing me at the same time, and he was saying something to me.” Biden has denied the incident occurred, but not quite as often or intently as Kavanaugh – because Biden has not been equally hounded by congress or the media.


Does his mean that the #MeToo movement has moved on?

When Alyssa Milano, an entertainer who vehemently and often had asserted Ford’s believability, said that Biden should be entitled to a presumption of innocence daily denied to Kavanaugh, she was mauled by Rose McGowan, who co-starred with her in the series “Charmed.” Men, Milano said, deserve due process. “You are a fraud,” McGowan protested. “This is about holding the media accountable. You go after Trump & Kavanaugh saying Believe Victims, you are a lie (sic). You have always been a lie. The corrupt DNC is in on the smear job of Tara Reade, so are you. SHAME.”

Milano and McGowan both have a point. Men or women charged with a crime deserve due process. Neither Ford nor Reade formally reported to the police the men accused. But before due process can occur, the media lays out the case. And the case against Biden so far has received little attention, some of it turned accusingly on Biden’s accuser. 

Reade noted in her interview: “I contacted TimesUp, which is an organization for women that helps them get resources if you apply for legal resources and to help you…they took my case and after they took my case, they contacted lawyers to see if there were conflicts [of interest]. Some replied and then when they heard about the full thing, the full account, they were worried about it… One of them was going to take it, but then two of his partners in another state were working in the Virginia Biden campaign. [He said] if Biden’s…gonna drop out after Virginia, I can represent you… Well then he never did because Biden didn’t drop out, right? Then TimesUp got ahold of me [and said] that their lawyers told them their 501(c)(3) [status] would be at risk because it’s a presidential campaign and it’s too political and Biden was a candidate. And so they said, we can help you, but not with resources.”

Reade’s interviewer is a proud and articulate leftist -- very courageous, considering everyone on the left, including socialist Bernie Sanders, who recently endorsed Biden, is now being folded into the Biden camp. The tragic takeaway from the interview is that no one on the left could do anything to help Reade -- including people who wanted to help her. Even now Reade stands alone, but there is something heroic in her anguished solitude.

The Reade interview is, at a minimum, as convincing as Ford’s testimony, which occasioned such extravagant praise of the accuser from Blumenthal. Given the role played by Blumenthal in the Kavanaugh hearing, that of a bear baiter, one wonders when, if at all, Blumenthal will endorse Biden for president some time before the Coronavirus postponed Democrat National Nominating Convention meets in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p