Skip to main content

The Politics of Coronavirus



Pelosi
“When in doubt tell the truth. It will confound your enemies and astound your friends” ― Mark Twain

It looks like Majority Whip James Clyburn has let the political cat out of the bag. National Democrats have larded with ideological pork a massive $1.8 trillion dollar rescue plan brought forth to mitigate Coronavirus, stopping in its tracks a bill designed to stop the pandemic in its tracks.

“The Senate bill that Democrats stopped,” the New York Post notes, “would have given nearly every American $1,200, with $500 for every child. It would have allocated $250 billion for unemployment insurance, $350 for a small business loan program, more than $100 billion to hospitals, $11 billion towards vaccines, $4.5 more to the CDC, $20 billion to veterans’ healthcare, $12 billion for public education, another $10 billion to airports, and $5 billion to FEMA.”

These are all measures Democrats, more loudly here in Connecticut than elsewhere, have been clamoring for. Only last week New York Governor Andrew Cuomo bestowed a once in a lifetime compliment on the Democrat’s bête noir, President Donald Trump, because Trump, after a phone call from Cuomo, had quickly sent aide to New York, a Coronavirus hot spot. Cuomo tweeted, “the President is "fully engaged on trying to help New York" and "very creative and energetic." Never-Trumper Minnesota Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar astounded her friends and confounded her enemies by tossing a similar compliment Trump’s way. “Politics aside,” Omar tweeted, “this [Trump’s response to the Coronavirus outbreak in the US] is incredible and the right response in this critical time.” Governor of Connecticut Ned Lamont is anxiously awaiting bailout cash from Trump. Lamont needs the bailout because he has diminished the flow of revenue to his state by closing down, through executive order, what he regards as “inessential” businesses in his state, a locution that begs the question: inessential to whom?

The Post has given us a pork inventory, along with a political rational to justify the larding. “This is a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision,” said Clyburn, and so Democrat leaders have restructured the mitigation bill; that is to say, they have added to the clean bill provisions that a) will not pass, and b) damage the rescue effort, perhaps irreparably, by delaying implementation of the rescue plan. The Democrat’s justification may remind people of their Law of Opposition stated with alarming brevity by Rham Emanuel: “Never let a crisis go to waste.” A corollary to Rham’s Law, the first casualty of which is the “truth” mentioned by Twain above, may be stated as briefly: If the crisis shows signs of mitigation, unmitigated it.”

Democrat Speaker of the US House Nancy Pelosi’s 1,400 page pork pie is full of indigestible ideological gristle. The sheer number of items in her bill that have nothing to do with mitigating Coronavirus, according to a partial listing in The Federalist, is mind-numbing. They include “’collective bargaining… for federal workers,’ a federal ‘study on climate mitigation efforts,’ tax credits for wind and solar energy, and demands that the airlines involved buy carbon credits ‘to fully offset [their] annual carbon emissions.’” The bill would enforce “’same day [voter] registration,’ national early voting and ‘grants for conducting’ election audits.” Pelosi’s venture into an ideological loud cuckoo land legislates “’funding standards for community newspapers’ retirement plans, cancels $10,000 off peoples’ college debts, and forces a $15 minimum wage and permanent paid leave on aid recipients. It awards more than $33 million to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ‘for necessary expenses to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus,’ and $35 million to Washington’s Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts,” in a craven effort, one supposes, to corral the “art vote.”

Some left of center news outlets suppose these absurd demands are designed to persuade Republicans in the U.S. Senate to take seriously some of the more extravagant demands made by U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer and Company, but the wrench Pelosi has thrown into a humming bipartisan plan, awkwardly defended by U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, is more likely to prolong the healing process foreshadowed by the commendatory remarks cited above by Cuomo and Omar. If time is of the essence in combating Coronavirus, the essence of Pelosi’s political slapstick comedy may be to prolong a reasonable mitigation of the virus in the hope that nation’s economy, considerably invigorated by Trump’s economic attentions, may flatline before the next national elections.

At some point, Connecticut’s left of center media might want to ask the seven all-Democrat members of the state’s U.S. Congressional delegation whether they approve of Pelosi’s pork-filled, ideologically oriented, non-mitigation Coronavirus bill. No one should hold his breath waiting for an answer to the question.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...