Skip to main content

Is There A future For US Socialism After Sanders


Bernie Sanders
When in 1992 Queen Elizabeth had been asked how she felt after Windsor Castle had suffered a severe fire gutting 100 rooms, she responded, “Awkward.”

Moderate Democrats and recovering progressives likely consider Vermont Socialist Bernie Sanders’ primary losses to former Vice President Joe Biden a propitious sign. Many Democrats are silently wishing Sanders will have the good grace to slink off silently into obscurity after he had been decisively rejected by voters. The association of the party of President John Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt with Sanders’ batty socialist ideas has been awkward. And why, friends of the Democrat Party are now asking, should Sanders cast a shadow over Biden’s presidential prospects when every Democrat’s nightmare, President Donald Trump, is waiting in the wings for four more years?

Super Tuesday washed most of the lesser Democrat presidential aspirants out of the primary race. Licking his wounds after primary losses in Missouri, Idaho Mississippi and, most importantly, Michigan – supposedly Sanders’ San Juan Hill – Sanders addressed reporters in Burlington, Vermont. He acknowledged he was “trailing badly in the race to secure enough delegates to clinch the nomination before the Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee,” according to an Associated Press (AP) account.

Teasingly, Sanders added, “While our campaign has won the ideological debate, we are losing the debate over electability. That is what millions of Democrats and independents today believe.” Sanders and his clamorous supporters still believe he has a better chance of wrestling Trump to the ground in a general election race: “Trump must be defeated, and I will do everything in my power to make sure that happens. On Sunday night, in the first one-on-one debate of this campaign, the American people will have the opportunity to see which candidate is best positioned to accomplish that.”

Sanders’ message to the Democrat Party establishment is that his socialist programs appeal to young people supporting his candidacy: “Today, I say to the Democratic establishment, in order to win in the future, you need to win the voters who represent the future of our country. And you must speak to the issues of concern to them. You cannot simply be satisfied by winning the votes of people who are older.”

The AP notes, “Sanders has indeed been widely favored over Biden by voters under 30, but he has not delivered on his strategy of getting them to the polls in great numbers, according to AP VoteCast surveys of voters in Tuesday’s Democratic primaries. Also problematic for him: Sanders showed no overwhelming strength with voters age 30 to 44, typically a larger share of the vote than the young, in Michigan and Missouri.”

Moderate and liberal, as opposed to socialist, Democrat voters obviously have not been persuaded by Sanders’ extreme leftist ideological prescriptions, and many traditional Democrat politicians tend to disagree with Sanders’ leftist spiel -- when they are not fishing in progressive ponds to pull in leftist votes. It is one thing for U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal to appear with a socialist leper on a public platform during a primary, quite a different thing to embrace the leper by endorsing him. Biden’s ascendancy among a majority of Democrat voters show that Sanders has lost the ideological argument, while it still may be an open question whether he or former Vice President Joe Biden are better able to defeat Trump in a general election, assuming Trump is not defeated by the economic consequences of the coronavirus outbreak first.

Democrats have thrown everything but the kitchen sink at Trump before and  since he had been sworn in as President nearly four years ago, yet Trump, though embattled,  remains unbowed. Can a microbe do what prominent impeachers such as Connecticut’s two U.S. Senators, Blumenthal and Chris Murphy -- not to mention a Democrat dominated U.S. House that provided a bill of impeachment rejected by the Republican dominated U.S. Senate -- failed to do?

There are Democrats who believe that Sanders never wanted to be president. His ideological path, increasingly rejected by Democrat voters, will not lead to the White House. But Sanders is a booster rocket for destructive socialist policies in the US. He views himself as an ideological precursor to some future, transformist, socialist autodidact, and as such his self-removal from the Democrat primaries appears less and less likely. Sanders cannot defer and cultivate the far left extremist wing of the Democrat Party. He is now in a position to press his ideological points to the bitter end.

If Biden makes this point in any future debate with Sanders, he will be doing his party an inestimable and necessary service.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p