Hamilton may have been right, because there is little doubt,
now much more so than in Hamilton’s day, that political decisions affect
business. In the larger polis, everything is wondrously knit together. The
polis has its own political ecology. We know the fate of a butterfly is
connected to available plants such as violets, milkweed, and asters; in the
same way, businesses may be connected to modern politics in such a way as to be
helpful -- or harmful. It is true the halls of state government swarm with
business lobbyists striving to guide governors to a path of prosperity, but the
will of a governor is moved by other political forces as well. Then too, no
governor governs alone. There are political and party interests that must be
satisfied at every corner.
A political editor and columnist recently lamented that Lamont was no
Lowell Weicker. What the moment needs, he thought, is yet another berserker
governor who would be able by force of will to push a toll tax through a politically
timid, tax resistant legislature. Weicker had vetoed three non-income tax
balanced budgets to achieve lift-off for his income tax. Similarly, Lamont hopes
to flood the state treasury with new revenue from a new revenue source, tolls, much
in the way Weicker flooded the 1991 state treasury with his new revenue source,
a state income tax.
The columnist doubted Lamont had the will and the intestinal
fortitude to buck a growing public resistance to tolls that has become much
more formidable than progressives in the General Assembly had anticipated and,
by force of will, push a tolling bill through the legislative sausage grinder. Sadly,
the columnist decided, Lamont is no Weicker, the more important question having
escaped rigorous thought: Why hadn’t past and recent massive tax increases
succeeded in reducing deficits permanently?
Getting and spending, we know, are conjoined twins. We do
not need a Milton Friedman or a John Maynard Keynes to tell us that the more
you get, the more you spend; and the more you spend, the more you may spend
imprudently. Years after Weicker had left politics, he appeared with a panel of
businessmen at the Hartford Club. Asked to reflect on Connecticut’s then burgeoning
debt, Weicker groaned, “Where did it all go?” But he knew where it went.
Politicians spent it and, by raising
taxes, relieved themselves of cutting governmental
costs, always a painful ordeal for those who have pledged their political troth
to state employee unions, Connecticut’s fourth branch of government.
How do we de-escalate costs has been the single most
important question in politics for the last few decades. Weicker’s response to
our current pending calamity – Connecticut, broke and caught in the bloody jaws
of a malingering recession, is incapable of settling cost problems through more
tax increases -- was woefully insufficient and wrong-headed.
The current crop of state and federal legislators, nearly
all Democrats, have forgotten everything and learned nothing from recent
history. Lamont has put into his toll basket all his political eggs, – including
business costs involved in two measures dear to progressives, the minimum wage and
family leave bills. One
commentator believes that Lamont, new to state politics, might have
used both bills to exert pressure on timid Democrats to support prospective
tolls. The toll bill is still a work in progress and there is yet no indication
that Connecticut’s toll plan will pass muster with a federal government that
insists tolls must be used to reduce congestion; not all of the gantries
proposed by Lamont serve this purpose.
And then, of course, there is Peter Schneider who accosted
Lamont during a town hall meeting in Bethel on January 1.
“My name is Peter Schneider. I’ve been a Bethel resident
since 1958. I went to high school in this building… It’s important to know
that I’ve got roots here. I’m leaving, after all these years in Bethel. I built
my house here 34 years ago, and I can’t afford to stay. 2008 took the wind out of
my sails. Everyone in construction took a beating in 2008, and we’ve been
bouncing along the bottom ever since. Now, my question is this: people in the
private sector have made adjustments. Instead of going out to eat, we eat at
home... My business value went from 3 million to 180 thousand – that’s a drop
off, and it never recovered. The reason I say this is because I’m not alone. My
point is this: the private sector in Connecticut has made adjustments. We’ve
been keeping our head above water. I think it’s time for you, Mr. Governor, to
lay down the hammer, renegotiate the SEBAC [union contract] agreements and cut
our spending. It’s not fair that you did not lay anybody off, so that we can
keep our revenue and our expenses in check. Everything I heard today so far is
roses and peaches and cream, very nice, but it involves spending more money
than we already spend, and we're already one of the highest per capita debts
in the country. Let’s get the job done. Let’s drop down the hammer and get the
job done. (Raucous applause).”
The majority party in Connecticut is, of course, safe from
such Town Hall assaults on past crippling policies. Schneider does not write commentary
for any media outlets in Connecticut.
Comments