Skip to main content

Blumenthal Visits The Border


Crisis at the Border January to June
It’s a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there. U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal, the closest Connecticut will ever get to a political saint, visited the U.S. Mexico border near the end of July and arrived home to plaudits.

Blumenthal is used to plaudits. One can count on the fingers of one hand the number of criticisms the left leaning Blumenthal received when he was Connecticut’s attorney general, a post he held in good odor for more than twenty years. But then, Blumenthal was expert in the ways of media, having been in his college years an editor of the Harvard Crimson. His media releases during his days as attorney general, liberally studded with explosive adjectives and disguised rhetorical IED’s, read as if they had been written by the New York Times editorial board.

Moving almost directly from college into politics, Blumenthal had little experience in the real world of business, an unfamiliarity that did not prevent him from suing, threatening to sue or seizing the assets of an assortment of businesses in Connecticut. When finally he left his safe sinecure, former chairman of Connecticut’s Democrat Party George Jepsen, who followed Blumenthal into office, quickly disposed of hundreds of open  cases left on the AG’s shelf by Blumenthal.

At long last, the New York Times finally shot an arrow his way. Blumenthal had several times said or intimated that he had served as a marine in Vietnam, a claim exploded by some critics weary of his white-hatted imposture. Blumenthal said he had misspoken – several times at several different venues over the years, and his botched stolen valor attempt was soon forgotten by all but rabid anti-Blumenthalists. The incident did not figure greatly in Blumenthal’s U.S. senate bid.

In the senate, Blumenthal has stoutly defended Planned Parenthood from all attempts to regulate the multi-million dollar abortion business. This seemed to some an odd posture coming from a man who had been, as attorney general, a perhaps too ardent regulator of businesses whose processes he little understood.

The day of Blumenthal’s visit, we are told by CTMirror, was “blisteringly hot.” The GOP was to blame, said Blumenthal and other Democrats, among them Senator Chuck Schumer of New York,  for “an immigration crisis that began after President Donald Trump implemented a ‘zero-tolerance’ policy aimed at detaining all undocumented immigrants who try to enter the United States, even those who are trying to make asylum claims at border checkpoints.”

The two senators failed to mention that the real crisis at the vanishing U.S. Mexico border was in evidence during the administration of Democrat President Barack Obama. Between 2013 and 2014, the number of unaccompanied children apprehended at the border increased nearly 80%, from 38,759 in fiscal year 2013 to 68,541 in fiscal year 2014. A 1997 federal court decision, Flores v. Reno, strictly limits the time that children can be kept in detention and, because parents and children cannot be kept in immigration detention together, the U.S. government has no choice but to criminally charge the parent or the presumed custodians of the children and then send the children to the Department of Health and Human Services as “unaccompanied alien children.”

The immigration system was constructed at a time when immigrants passing from Mexico into the United States applied for legal entree or asylum unaccompanied by children, who have now become passports all but permitting illegal, unvetted border crashers to remain in the country and bypass court scrutiny. And that is a problem that cannot be resolved by professions of concern from Blumenthal standing outside detention centers in Texas on blistering July days while cutting video clips that may be utilized in future campaigns.

Here are some few questions that may help to refocus attention on the real problem:

1) Does Blumenthal believe that a border is nothing more than a demarcation line on a map, or does he believe that a border is a series of customs, laws and processes that must be enforced by something resembling a police power – i.e. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)?

2) Should border crashers be punished for having entered the country illegally? If so, what sanctions should be applied to dissuade others from doing the same?

3) Should a person who bypasses the usual immigration vetting process have more rights and privileges than Blumenthal’s campaign customers, the lawful citizens of Connecticut who regularly return him to office? 

4) What positive recommendations have been offered by Blumenthal – apart from seeking grounds to impeach Trump – that will permanently settle the problem of unvetted border crashers who, once let loose in the country, easily avoid court judgments or the long arm of ICE by fleeing to Connecticut's major sanctuary cities?

Thoughtful, honest answers to these kinds of questions, rarely asked of Blumenthal by Connecticut’s media, may help to settle what even he now calls a “crisis” at the border. Media availabilities spent under a blisteringly hot sun at detention centers while mouthing the usual campaign slogans – “It’s the policy of deliberate cruelty that’s the elephant in the room here, not so invisibly”-- will not get the job done.



Comments

Dan Ryan Galt said…
Now go visit a Planned Parenthood Clinic and report on the deplorable conditions the children there are forced to endure.
What a hypocrite.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p