Skip to main content

Undervaluing Deficits



There will be time, there will be time 
To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet…
Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions
And for a hundred visions and revisions
Before the taking of a toast and tea.

These lines, clipped from T.S. Eliot’s poem The Love-Song Of J. Alfred Prufrock, might easily describe the “visions and revisions” of Connecticut’s here-again, gone-again budget deficits.

Kevin Lembo – so far, Connecticut’s straight-shooting Comptroller – revised his deficit estimate early in March by $40 million, not the only revision in Governor Dannel Malloy’s second term. The boost in the deficit figure, Mr. Lembo said, was the result in part of an over-estimation of revenue the state had expected to collect from capital gains taxes paid through the personal income tax.


Capital gains taxes are a rake-off from stocks, and stocks have been in flux for the past few years. Mr. Lembo has attributed the more slender tax haul in capital gains to major changes in federal law, among which was, according to one story, “the termination of Bush era tax exemptions.” Of course, Wall Street investors understand every elimination of a tax exemption as a tax increase. One might put the matter a slightly different way and say, much more truthfully, that Wall Street investments are sluggish because revenue from the capital gains tax has been increased during the Obama administration.

We know what is driving state deficits – too much spending at a time when, at least in Connecticut, the state continues to be racked by a malingering and punishing recession. The recession rut in Connecticut has been deepened by repeated large tax increases, burdensome regulations and a crony capitalist state government that taxes nail salon owners and distributes some of the tax money collected from small businesses to either solvent large corporations that might move out of state or smaller businesses whose continuing prosperity is, to put it gently, questionable. Elsewhere in the nation, the recession has dissipated – not here.

What is it that is driving the continuing underestimation of state deficits?

Answer: Neither Mr. Malloy nor the Democratic dominated General Assembly wish to inconvenience each other. State statute stipulates that when a deficit reaches more than one percent of General Fund, the deficit must be resolved by the legislature; that is to say, the budget must be resubmitted to the General Assembly, a time consuming and politically embarrassing prospect. The governor’s recission authority, operative only AFTER the budget has been approved by the General Assembly, kicks in when the deficit is less than one percent.  Properly speaking, a so-called “recission” that occurs BEFORE the General Assembly has adopted a budget is a revision, not a recission.

During his first term, Mr. Malloy sent his budget to the General Assembly, which speedily approved it. The approved budget was then substantially changed after Mr. Malloy’s closed door negotiations with SEBAC, a union conglomerate authorized to negotiated contracts with the governor. The changed budget, however, was not resubmitted to the General Assembly for reapproval – purely for political reasons. Bottom line: The General Assembly had invested Mr. Malloy with plenary powers that are, to put it charitably, a violation of state statute, a violation of the state Constitution and a violation of the doctrine of the separation of powers, which holds that the legislature, not the governor, is responsible for authorizing  appropriations and expenditures.

This time around, the process has been flipped. The budget submitted to the General Assembly was, despite the fog of confusion that surrounds all of Connecticut’s budgets, not in balance. Mr. Lembo, whose budget calculations appear to be far more accurate than those of Mr. Barnes, insists that the budget submitted by Mr. Malloy is out of balance by some $101.2 million. If the submitted budget is not in balance, constitutional protocol requires the General Assembly to return the proposed budget to the governor so that statutory and constitutional requirements may be satisfied. The law, confining to be sure, is a stop sign. And a government of the people, by the people and for the people will not roll through such signs with impunity.
               
The out-of-balance budget likely will not be returned by the legislative branch to the executive branch: Among progressives, all limits may be exceeded at will to assure a predestined end. Limiting statutes and constitutional niceties are for saps to observe. In a one party state, the governor has only to hit the flashing lights on his cruiser to fly past every stop sign and red light.


Mr. Malloy, busy in Washington and on the national air waves promoting the most progressive presidential regime in modern times, has put himself on cruise control. His budget, he insists, is in balance. It is NOT in balance. But what cop, hidden behind the bridge, is watching? Mr. Malloy’s fallback position is: If my budget is not in balance, the same General Assembly that invested me with plenary powers during my first term will make straight the way of their lord.

Comments

peter brush said…

I'm a Louis MacNeice fan. He's more profane than Elliot, but then, moderate profanity is appropriate for our situation here in Dannel Land.
--------------
...
It's no go the picture palace, it's no go the stadium,
It's no go the country cot with a pot of pink geraniums,
It's no go the Government grants, it's no go the elections,
Sit on your arse for fifty years and hang your hat on a pension...
peter brush said…
I see that the new baseball team in Hartford needs a name. Young Gelernter at NRO suggests some good ones, including The Halers. I thought it might be a nice way to honor our history and to refer to our contemporary dem socialist ideology; name them The Equalizers. But, someone on the NRO blog already came up with it, so, how about Malloy's Ball Boys?
The important thing is equal access to the games. Will the government provide vouchers? Can we get into the old ball game with our EBT cards, or just get some peanuts and Cracker Jacks?
-----------------
A slang term for a gun

Nickname for the Colt Single Action Army

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p