The picture shows former State
House Speaker Chris Donovan smiling broadly and sporting new hair on his face,
a white trimmed beard and moustache. He is chatting with Lieutenant Governor
Nancy Wyman, who is smiling and appears to be sharing a humorous confidence
with Mr. Donovan.
Could she be remarking on his spiffy new look? Or perhaps
she is congratulating the recipient of NARAL’s (National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws) attentions at having escaped the
prosecutorial noose that hanged his campaign finance director and other staff
members who worked on Mr. Donovan’s failed U.S. House bid in Connecticut’s 5th
District.
The reporting on Mr. Donovan’s fall from grace into the
clutches of an FBI sting operation has left a bad taste in the mouth of
uber-progressive Democratic operative Tom Swan, Mr. Donovan’s former campaign manager.
According to a report in the Hartford Courant,
Mr. Swan has refused to speak with the paper in the absence of an apology for
what he has called the Courant’s “character assassination [of Mr. Donovan] and
lack of journalistic integrity” with respect to its reporting on the FBI sting
operation.
Mr. Swan came late to the Donovan campaign for the 5th.
He arrived on the scene after the FBI had sprung its trap, catching in its
unforgiving jaws Mr. Donovan’s former campaign manager who, having determined
not to cooperate in the FBI sting, was duly sent up the river.
A small book might easily be written about the 5th
District races. Mr. Donovan was not alone in being swept up in the euphoria of
election.
The FBI has been more than fair in its tortuous prosecutions.
On the Republican side, former Governor and felon John Rowland, then a radio
talk show host, was prosecuted and found guilty of corruption charges after
Lisa-Wilson Foley, running on the Republican ticket for the U.S. House in the 5th,
decided to cooperate in the FBI investigation and fed Mr. Rowland to the same sting-operators
that had left not a scratch on Mr. Donovan’s Teflon coated reputation. Ms.
Foley emerged from the ordeal with a whole hide, while Mr. Rowland, then a
friendless journalist, was sent up the river – AGAIN, as Connecticut’s ink
stained wretches noted in their reports. No Republican of any stature has told
anyone in Connecticut’s media they will not talk to the press until political
commentators apologize for having failed to come to the aid of a journalist who
was exercising his First Amendment rights in preferring Ms. Foley to other
Democrats in the 5th District field.
Largely because of the FBI prosecutions, the 5th District seat
was taken by Democrat Elizabeth Esty, the principal beneficiary of the interventions.
Along the way, Andrew Roraback, the Republican Party nominee for the seat, was
given the editorial boot by the same people now snubbed by Mr. Swan. Mr.
Roraback, whose position on abortion is as reliably left as that of Mr. Donovan,
was later rewarded with an appointment to Connecticut’s Superior Court by
Governor Dannel Malloy.
Despite Mr. Swan’s brief against newspapers, there are no
Democratic losers following the “Taking of the Fifth” by Democrats. Mrs. Esty has just won re-election against a Republican Party
candidate in the 5th whose testimony was at least partly responsible
for the conviction of radio talk show host Rowland, Connecticut’s Republican
Nixon. Mr. Roraback, shuttled off to Superior Court, has been removed as a
possible future contender. And the progressive rehabilitation of Mr. Donovan, even
Mr. Swan cannot have failed to notice, is well underway.
In late November, Donovan was honored by NARAL Pro-Choice Connecticut for his
advocacy on behalf of legalized abortion and access to birth control. Along
with social worker Nancy Humphreys, he was awarded the group's Catherine
Roraback Award, named after the civil rights attorney in Connecticut best
known for representing Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton in the famous
1965 Supreme Court case, Griswold v. Connecticut, which
legalized the use of birth control and created the precedent of the ‘right
to privacy’ later employed by an imaginative Supreme Court to rid the United
States of its anti-abortion demons. Catherine Roraback was Andrew Roraback’s cousin.
Mr. Donovan – “Connecticut’s best feminist,” according to a
NARAList -- told the group during the ceremony that his path to feminism was
curious: “I grew up in the '50s and '60s. There were a lot of women who set me
straight." One of them was an emancipated woman who one day told Mr.
Donovan that, going forward, she would not be shaving her underarms. Mr. Donovan’s
first reaction was outrage, but the feminist set him straight: "We were
outraged as men that she could even think to do that. But she would say to us,
'Why are you so upset about it? That's my choice ...' She helped teach us what
it is all about."
Such was Mr. Donovan’s Damascus Road revelation. For the
committed NAREList, there is little difference between declining to shave your
underarms and procuring a partial birth abortion. Since stumbling over an FBI
sting operation, “Connecticut’s best feminist” has plowed valiantly forward.
One door is shut, another opens. Progress never ends, and neither does
progressivism, the doctrine that everything but progressive government must be
reformed. Some suspect there may be a future for Mr. Donovan in academia, a secular
version of the purgatorium, where old progressives are held until the
grim reaper comes a’calling.
Comments
The New Haven "Register" demands severe punishment, and equates Rowland's crimes to those of Hack Donovan's Right-hand Hacks. The two cases are not similar. It is quite easy to view the actions of Team Donovan as classic corruption of policy by means of cash pro quo. On the other hand, it's impossible to view Rowland's clandestine employment by the Foley-Wilson campaign as corruption of any office at all. To boot, it was certainly possible for the jury to have acquitted based on the evidence that he actually did work for the Foley business. Rowland's crime was at most an insult to our National Government's fetish for maximum egalitarian democratic procedure. Give the franchise to people waded across the Rio Grande twenty years ago, to Fergusonians who actually dislike the country, to felons, to people who can't read or write, but throw Rowland in the dungeon.
Klinton-appointed Judge Atherton should uphold the rule of law by giving Rowland the lightest possible sentence, suspended, if possible. Scold him, if she wants, and require that he read the Hartford "Courant" every morning and listen to Connecticut Public Radio every night.
---------------
Rowland’s and Braddock’s crimes were similar in severity and in that both could have easily avoided breaking the law. Braddock was accepting campaign donations through straw donors to conceal the identities of roll-your-own-tobacco businessmen who could have legally donated to the campaign or PACs supporting it in multiple ways. Rowland could have worked as a consultant for Wilson-Foley’s campaign legally. He could have been paid publicly through the campaign, which had ample funds for such a role. Or he could have done real work for Brian Foley’s nursing home chain. It still would have been a gray area and a quid pro quo skirting of campaign finance laws, but one unlikely to have led to criminal charges...
...Judge Arterton would be right in sending a strong message about Rowland’s new crimes. The sentence should send chills down the spine of any Connecticut political operative engaged in or considering similar perversions of the democratic process in our state.
http://www.nhregister.com/opinion/20140920/editorial-john-rowland-deserves-lengthy-prison-sentence
----------------------------
...The ethnic Chinese magnate's ties to the Clintons have been a source of heated controversy since the late 1990s, when Riady became embroiled in one of the murkiest episodes of the Clinton presidency -- a campaign fundraising scandal that caused a big political ruckus in Washington amid Republican Party allegations, never proved, of meddling by China's intelligence services in American politics...
Riady, 52, declined to be interviewed but, in an e-mailed response to written questions, he said the teachings of Christ "inform all that I do." He said he hadn't seen the Clintons during his 2009 trips to America but did pay $20,000 to become a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, an annual gathering of prominent figures in politics, business and philanthropy sponsored by Bill Clinton.
The saga brought Riady and his family-run conglomerate, Lippo Group, an $8.6 million fine, the biggest penalty in the history of U.S. campaign finance violations...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/04/AR2010010403106.html