Skip to main content

State To LOWER Educational Testing Standards -- Pedagogical Gobbledygook


The following lede paragraph below in italics appeared in a Hartford newspaper under the heading, “State Working On New Rating System For Schools That Goes Beyond Test Scores.”

“State officials are seeking to broaden the measurement of school performance, often criticized for over-reliance on test scores, to include the arts, civics, physical fitness, attendance, and even qualities such as student persistence and personal development.”

Here is a re-write that accurately reflects both the intention and the outcome of the state’s effort to lower the measurement standard:

“State officials, attempting to readjust federal standards concerning test measurements  so as to satisfy Connecticut’s reform averse teacher unions, are seeking to dilute the measurement of school performance in core subjects by including among them the arts, civics, physical fitness, attendance, and even qualities such as student persistence and personal development.”


As my late father-in-law – without doubt the best malapropist in Connecticut -- might have said, “If the truth pinches, wear it.”

Educational reformers in the state who had hoped to reform education by creating a standard according to which the pedagogical chaff would be separated from the pedagogical wheat, particularly in underperforming urban public schools, had better hope that the Feds, who must pass on this nonsense, have the wit to see through politics as practiced in Connecticut. Here, somewhat like the Aztecs of old, we throw our children on the pyre to placate Union gods.


Comments

peter brush said…
“If the truth pinches, wear it.”
----------------
The truth that nobody wants to accept, certainly not out loud, is that the primary qualitative difference between government school districts is the students. (If not nature, than certainly lack of nurture.) I am actually sympathetic with teacher desire for plausibly reachable standards, when so much of education is out of their hands. Granted, their self-serving complaints in the key of political correctness are humorous. I am also sympathetic with taxpayers who don't want to pay teachers or administrators for the bloated, bureaucratic, monopolistic monstrosity that is our education "system," I consider myself fortunate that I wasn't arrested for child abuse when I allowed my kid kid to attend HPS for seven years. Curious that guys like Eric Holder don't crack teacher heads as enthusiastically as cop cabezas. Is there not a history of white liberal oppression leading to that notorious Achievement Gap? Don't minority-community Americans distrust Big Education, if not Western Civ altogether?
---------
HARTFORD — The Hartford Federation of Teachers has expressed concern to the superintendent over higher academic goals for students this school year, saying the goals are excessive and causing undue stress on educators.
..."This inverted equation is meant to close the achievement gap," Delaney said. "I understand that; I get it. I understand this principle and strive for it every day I come here to work. It is the thought that drives me to demand rigor from all my students."

But, she added, "Don't ask me to achieve a one-size-fits-all growth when you have not achieved equity at all schools" http://www.courant.com/community/hartford/hartford-cityline/hc-hartford-teachers-union-1120-20141119-story.html
peter brush said…
I'd appreciate it as an interested observer, if not a self-governing citizen, if teachers in Hartford were to wear cameras, as is presently being urged for cops. I think it possible that such a move would enhance the position of teachers against standards. I am certain it would work to the detriment of the Government Education System as a whole.

Let's see with our own eyeballs how education reform is going. While we're at it, why don't we get a load of how much good Sheff v. O'Neil has done for the kids of Hartford. Get a good look at what we're buying for $500,000,000 per year?

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...