Republican Gubernatorial nominee Tom Foley has been accused of
plagiarism in an attack ad endorsed by Governor Dannel Malloy. Should there be
an FBI investigation?
Knowing the ways and means of powerful political incumbents,
an investigation of some sort may be in the offing. Incumbents have a way of
turning the great water cannons at their disposal against their, relatively
speaking, inoffensive challengers. When Hartford Courant columnist Robert Thorson protested that innocent plagiaristic-like slip-ups were common in this the era
of “copy and paste,” he risked being set upon by the righteous forces
supporting Mr. Malloy, who has not yet been accused of plagiarism, though in
this regard he is guilty as Foley.
Mr. Malloy’s recent Bibb ad, in which former workers at the
Bibb factory step before the cameras to accuse Mr. Foley of snatching food from
the mouths of their children, was plagiarized from an earlier assault on Mr.
Foley produced by Jamestown Associates and endorsed by then Republican primary
opponent Mike Fedele.
No doubt someone in the Malloy campaign scrubbed the old ad
until it shone like a new penny, but the political thrust of both ads was the
same, and “content-wise” the ads carried the same message. One wonders whether
Jamestown Associates might legitimately sue the Malloy administration for
uncredited use of its material. Surely, the point is that in politics, as in
life in general, there are no new primary colors. All information comes from
somewhere else, and sometimes the scrubbers sleep.
The most recent gubernatorial debate sponsored by the Hartford Courant and Fox CT seemed crude. But the players are big boys;
they can handle themselves. While the confrontation was rough on the edges, it
was not nearly as edgy as the John Adams-Thomas Jefferson bout in 1796. The accusations in that campaign came from supporters rather than
the principal candidates. Jefferson’s flunkies accused Adams of being a
hermaphrodite who had “neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the
gentleness and sensibility of a woman." And Adam’s supporters returned
fire in kind; they said Jefferson was the son of a half-breed Indian squaw and
a mulatto father. Now, those are fighting words.
There is a sense among voters, especially undecided voters,
that personal attacks are, or should be, scrubbed from campaigns – when the
charges made do not pertain to governance. Most personal attacks are needlessly
distracting. The problem is that the character of a governor or his opponent
really is central to both campaigns and governance. We want to know who the
governor is and what he will do once in office. In the case of incumbents,
those questions are more easily answered, because the incumbent will be running
either on or away from his record in office. In the present case, Mr. Foley has
no record in office as a governor. Generally, Americans like a contest of ideas.
The clash between Lincoln and Douglas, for instance, was centered on the more
important questions of the day: Would the union hold; would slavery be extended
into the new territories?
Not all the gubernatorial debates have been testy. The most watchable recent debate was the one at Saint Joseph College hosted by Eyewitness News. Connecticut
Commentary has often said that we may be approaching a time in Connecticut at
which events rather than debates will determine elections.
The event that may determine this one is an economy stuck in
low dive.
While the national recession ended five years ago,
Connecticut and much of the Eastern Seaboard, where progressives hold sway, is
still enmeshed in the coils of a stalled recovery. Connecticut has recovered
only about half of the jobs it lost during the national recession. The sluggish
recovery is not theoretical; it is a lived experience. We are watching
jobs out-migrate to areas of the country in which taxes are modest and
regulations are far less punishing than in once entrepreneurial Connecticut.
Graduates of very expensive colleges in the state are taking their sheepskins
to other states. Unable to absorb higher costs, businesses in Connecticut are
looking ominously at the exit signs. State government has now taken to bribing
mega-companies such as United Technologies to stay in Connecticut.
The most accurate and forward thinking think-tank in
Connecticut, the Yankee Institute, some time ago published a list of
Connecticut taxes and fees that should blast the studied indifference of every
Connecticut legislator. Connecticut collected revenue from 371 unique sources
in fiscal year 2012. However, the Yankee Institute found, the bottom 200 sources generated a
revenue total of only $22 million, “raising a question about the cost
effectiveness of collecting so many fees that bring in so little revenue.” This
may, one can only hope, strike the few remaining rationalists in Connecticut’s
General Assembly as insane: If it cost the state more money to collect tax A than
the state realizes by imposing tax A, should we not eliminate tax A? The
non-political answer is – YES!
Connecticut’s actual unfunded pension liability, according
to the Yankee Institute, is approaching $100 billion, a figure that could be
mitigated if the state were to chuck its defined benefit pension system and
adopt the defined contribution system much used in the private sector.
If you are drowning in pension liability debt -- $27,668 for every man, woman and child in Connecticut -- and someone throws
you a defined contribution lifeline, are you not suicidal if you reject the rescue?
The non-political answer is – YES!
Put beside such momentous mountains, Mr. Foley’s car
accident many moons ago (He was never prosecuted) and Mr. Malloy’s corruption
investigation (He was cleared of all charges) are truly insignificant
molehills.
And who cares if either of them smoked pot in their wild and
reckless youth? President Barack Obama smoked pot regularly, consorted with at
least two terrorists, Bill Ayres and his wife Bernardine Dohrn, both pedagogues, invented incidents and
characters in a book regarded by many as an autobiographical rendering of his
life – and Mr. Obama won two elections for the presidency. He
even survived the anti-American chidings of black power preacher Jeremiah Wright.
If Mr. Obama can survive his discreditable friends and his dubious autobiography, we must
assume that death by personal attack in the new progressive era now upon us
hath lost its sting.
Comments
------
GOVERNOR, DO YOU BELIEVE AMBASSADOR FOLEY IS DISHONEST?
Dannel P. Malloy
THINK THAT RECORDS ARE IMPORTANT, WHAT PEOPLE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST IN THEIR PROFESSIONAL OR POLITICAL LIVES IS IMPORTANT. I THINK ULTIMATELY, THE CONSTITUENCY, VOTERS DECIDE WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT. I THINK YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS IN THE FUTURE BASED ON WHAT PEOPLE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST. I THINK LOTS OF THINGS GET COMMENTED ON. IN CONNECTICUT, WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS. WE ARE MOVING FORWARD. WE SHOULD BE PROUD OF THAT. I'M PROUD TO TALK ABOUT CONNECTICUT IN VERY STRONG FASHION ABOUT HOW FAR WE HAVE COME AND HOW FAR WE HAVE YET TO GO, BUT PEOPLE WILL MAKE PREDICTIONS BASED ON TOM'S RECORD AND MY RECORD, AND I SUPPOSE IT WILL BE DISCUSSED. >> AMBASSADOR FOLEY. >> IT'S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, BOTH TRUTHFULNESS AND INTEGRITY, WHICH IS RELATED TO ETHICS.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?321218-1/connecticut-governors-debate