Skip to main content

DeLauro’s Alternative Ways


Remarking on the guilty verdict in the recently concluded trial of former radio talk show host John Rowland, Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney noted, "It's very sad to see.” Mr. Rowland’s fall from grace was due “at least in part” to arrogance, but it was also related to the fact Mr. Rowland “never learned to find alternative ways of earning a living other than through political influence."

Mr. Rowland may or may not be arrogant, an attribute usually associated with politicians; what is the difference, for example, between arrogance and self-assurance, and is it possible for politicians who lack self-assurance to be effective in office?

It is undoubtedly true that Mr. Rowland was inept in earning a living when he was a politician.  Other politicians are far smoother in the gentle art of making politics pay.


For more artful politicians, there are alternative ways of earning a living that are perfectly legal, if ethically dubious. Former Speaker of the U.S. House Nancy Pelosi regularly steered business to her husband.  Here in Connecticut, 3rd District Congresswoman  Rosa DeLauro has shown herself a master exploiting her political influence, according to a 2011 piece in Human Events, “DeLauro Campaign Finances Raise Questions.”

“In the last four congressional election cycles,” Human Events noted three years ago, “the campaign committee for Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, Friends of Rosa DeLauro, transferred $1.2 million to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which in the same period paid $1.9 million to Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for polling and other services, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings. Stanley B. Greenberg, founding partner of GQRR, is DeLauro’s husband of 33 years.”

Mrs. DeLauro’s seat in Congress, surrounded by a moat of media good will, is well-nigh impregnable. And though questions were raised outside the state, here in Connecticut the usual ethical watchdogs did not rend the air with howls of protests as Mrs. DeLauro moved money effortlessly from campaign donations to the Democratic Campaign Committee, which gratefully provided alternative means to her wealthy husband. According to the three year old Human Events story, the DeLauro’s are not living from hand to mouth. Mrs. DeLauro falls in the top 10 percent of the wealthiest members of Congress. Her digs in Washington D.C. are suitably plush and spacious enough to entertain lavishly government officials, potential donors and down on their luck political operatives such as Rahm Emanuel, President Barack Obama’s political godfather, for whom Mrs. DeLauro once provided room and board. U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal is also in the top ten.

Mrs. DeLauro is one of seven members of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation, all Democrats. The last time her seat was held by a Republican was in 1983. Only the 1st Congressional District, U.S. Representative John Larson’s bailiwick, is considered more Democratic. Among active registered voters in 2012, there were in Mrs. DeLauro’s District 145,529 Democrats, 65,324 Republicans and 178,593 Unaffiliateds, a margin so comfortable that even a political reprobate like Mr. Rowland might be able to defend the district against all challengers – provided he were a Democrat. It is the virtual certainty of reelection in the 5th that has freed Mrs. DeLauro to be Mrs. DeLauro.

Which is what? The answer to this question depends upon one’s political point of view. To put the matter briefly, the fabulously wealthy Mrs. DeLauro is perhaps the most progressive Congresswoman in the state’s delegation. In Districts more open to challenge – say, the 4th or 5th – Democratic politicians tend to be more cautious. Mrs. DeLauro can well afford to throw caution to the wind.


Her great wealth, the political makeup of her district and a disinclination among Connecticut’s media to scrutinize closely her foreign and domestic policy voting record, all combine to teflonize  Mrs.  DeLauro. The more impregnable she becomes, the less critical Connecticut’s media becomes with respect -- just to pick one example out of a hat – to Mrs. DeLauro’s foreign policy prescriptions.  Indeed, foreign policy is not even listed among areas of concern under the “issues” section on Mrs. DeLauro’s official congressional site, very likely because she has shown little concern for a foreign policy engineered by President Barack Obama that strikes many of her center and right of center constituents as dangerously incomprehensible.

Comments

peter brush said…
It is said that self-dealing is a breach of fiduciary duty. When our political class operates so flamboyantly outside the bounds of its Constitution Mrs. Greenberg's sleazy career is merely insult to injury. Put differently, I'd not be offended by her self-aggrandizement nearly so much if she'd just leave us alone, for example, by repealing Obamacare, eliminating the IRS, and "reforming" the entitlement programs.
-------
Political scientists Ken Kernaghan and John Langford define self-dealing as "a situation where one takes an action in an official capacity which involves dealing with oneself in a private capacity and which confers a benefit on oneself."[1]

Examples include "work[ing] for government and us[ing] your official position to secure a contract for a private consulting company you own" or "using your government position to get a summer job for your daughter."[2]

Where a fiduciary has engaged in self-dealing, this constitutes a breach of the fiduciary relationship. The principal of that fiduciary (the person to whom duties are owed) may sue and both recover the principal's lost profits and disgorge the principal's wrongful profits.
peter brush said…
It is the virtual certainty of reelection in the 5th that has freed Mrs. DeLauro to be Mrs. DeLauro.
------
Which is to say that she doesn't have to act the tyrant in order to get votes. She would win, still be able to shuffle money through Mr. Delauro's outfit, even if she were to consider the interest of her district and country; act with a modicum of decency, patriotism, and common sense rather than as a rubber stamp for our alienated Presidente de la Pluma y del Telefono. She operates the way she does out of sincere fanatical ideological dedication.

But what does it say about the people of that district that elect her and reelect her so enthusiastically? And, acknowledging that about them, must we not also admit that we are doomed, or at a minimum, we have a plausible excuse for thinking so.

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e