The
expression “the devil is in the details,” first appearing in print in 1975, is
a variation of an earlier expression, “The good God is in the detail,”
sometimes attributed to Gustave Flaubert. Both expressions point to the
importance of detail, what we moderns call verifiable data or facts.
Politicians,
to no one’s surprise, sometimes traffic in facts, sometimes not.
In
a recent copyrighted story in
the Hartford Courant, U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal is shown expressing his
disdain for the devilish details surrounding the Sandy Hook massacre: “Blumenthal
dismissed the statistics and legal intricacies and focused on Begg and Heslin
sitting at the witness table. He said, ‘Some or all of those 20 beautiful
children and six great educators would be alive today if assault weapons had
been banned along with high capacity magazines.’"
Mr.
Blumenthal was speaking to reporters on the record following testimony before
the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee of one of the parents of the children, 20
in number, who were slain in Sandy Hook Elementary School.
As
expected, the testimony was heart rending. Only a heart of stone could
fail to be moved by the personal testimony of Neil Heslin, whose
6-year-old-son, Jesse Lewis, was murdered in the savage attack.
Also
present during the testimony was the sister of Victoria Soto, one of the heroic
figures in the Sandy Hook mass murderer.
Ms.
Soto was the First Grade teacher at Sandy Hook Elementary School who managed to
save children’s lives by hiding several of them in a closet. When Adam Lanza
entered her classroom after having killed fifteen students and two teachers, she
told him, with great presence of mind, that the children were in the
auditorium. Some students ran from their hiding place and Mr. Lanza shot them,
also shooting Ms. Soto who, in an attempt to save their lives, threw herself in
death’s path.
“We don’t want our sister to die for no reason,”
Jillian Soto told the host of MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show.” Courage runs deep in the Soto family.
“We lost our sister, tragically,” said Jillian, “and
we are now honoring her by fighting for her name and for change–in her name,
and all the other victims of Sandy Hook Elementary School and all the other
school shootings. We don’t just want her to be a statistic. We want her to be
known for who she is and the amazing teacher that she was -- the amazing sister
she was -- and ask for something, demand that something be done so that nobody
else has to go through this.”
“So that nobody else has to go through this…” These
words should not be taken as a pointless rhetorical incantation. We should not
allow the devil to ease a pathway for us around the details; for, if we do, we
cannot arrive at a legislative destination that will assure family members of
the innocent children slaughtered in Sandy Hook that other parents will not,
like them, weep tears of blood when their innocent children are accosted by
gunmen in what used to be considered here in Connecticut a sanctuary of peace
and joy -- and this means that legislators must master the details, or the
faults in their legislation will ride them like devils.
The
architect of the federal bill preferred by Mr. Blumenthal is U.S. Senator
Dianne Feinstein of California. The Feinstein bill bans future sales of assault
weapons, already illegal under Connecticut law, while permitting current owners
to retain their weapons and, as such, would not have prevented Adam Lanza from
acquiring the weapon he used to slaughter children in Sandy Hook. A
confiscation of such weapons legally owned by their purchasers might have
prevented Mr. Lanza’s use of the AR15, a semi-automatic long rifle, but then
Mr. Lanza arrived at the school armed with two equally lethal handguns, the
weapon of choice in urban areas where the preponderance of murders occur. Only
a little less than three percent of homicides in 2011 were committed with long rifles.
The Feinstein bill also limits easily replaceable magazines to ten bullets.
According to a story the details of which have not been verified by the
official criminal report, not due until the summer, Mr. Lanza replaced his thirty
round magazines after having fired 15 rounds. The shotgun he left in the car
and the two hand guns he carried with him into the school would have been as
devastating.
When
Mr. Blumenthal said, focusing dramatically on Mr. Heslin and dismissing as “unimportant”
statistics and legal intricacies, “Some or all of those 20 beautiful children
and six great educators would be alive today if assault weapons had been banned
along with high capacity magazines," he was telling what Mark Twain used
to call a stretcher, not that he will ever be reproved for it by the right
people. Mr. Blumenthal, formerly an attorney general, did, after all, include
the slither word “some” in his stretcher.
Back
home, Democratic leaders in the General Assembly were spooking their brother legislators.
The president pro tem of the Senate
Don Williams and Majority Leader Martin Looney wrote a letter
to their colleagues demanding that a legislative committee complete its work on
time; and the bill presented to the General Assembly, they said, would be
“emergency certified.”
An "emergency certified bill" is one that short circuits the legislative process because an “emergency”
requiring short circuiting is at hand. The short circuiting, fortunately for
legislators who do not wish to leave unsightly fingerprints on the resulting
bill, renders hearings on proposed bills unnecessary. There is no emergency,
only a legislative stampede made in Washington. Convenient emergencies of this
kind are the enemy of the good and a shameless dereliction of legislative
responsibility. If legislators don't want to create effective bills, they
should find another means of employment.
The one notable Democratic legislator who appears to
be committed to a tried and sure legislative process designed to produce
efficacious legislation is Democratic Speaker of the House Brendan Sharkey. Mr.Sharkey is reluctant to sign on to emergency legislation the provisions of which have not been approved by the General
Assembly appointed bipartisan task force. Apparently, Mr. Sharkey prefers a more comprehensive bill
written by Connecticut legislators for citizens of Connecticut. Hearings on
proposed legislation allow legislators to shape bills with a view to particular
circumstances. The notion that the General Assembly should be stampeded in its
deliberations simply to meet a schedule imposed from Washington DC is more than
preposterous; it is dangerous because it subverts a republican constitutional
order and will likely produce a product useful only to politicians concerned
with campaign sound bites.
Comments