Skip to main content

More Business Flight


MetLife has recently announced it plans to move 2,600 jobs to North Carolina. The company has not yet announced how many jobs will be lost in Bloomfield, but it has announced that it will close its offices in Lowell, Mass., Somerset, N.J., and Aliso Viejo, Calif. It will reduce its workforce in Bloomfield, Boston, Irvine, Calif., Johnstown, Pa., and Warwick, R.I. What’s it all mean? A company spokesman has said that MetLife is trying to save money by consolidating operations.
Why North Carolina rather than, say, Bridgeport Connecticut?

Someone at MetLife knows how to add and subtract. According to a recent report, Bridgeport Connecticut is the highest taxed city in the country, another “first’ for a state that is third highest in its tax burden. South Carolina’s tax structure places it as number 10 among states with the lowest tax burden. Connecticut residents pay 12.3% of their income in taxes compared with 8.4% in South Carolina. One must assume that the bean counters have done their work and concluded that it would be more profitable to move operations to South Carolina.

While it may be possible possible that the governor of South Carolina made the company an offer it could not refuse, the more important consideration is: Why isn’t the Northeast able to meet offers made in the South?

The cost of labor is higher in the Northeast, and the governing ethic in the South, far less aggressive, is more amenable to the entrepreneurial spirit.  Under the progressive administration of Governor Dannel Malloy and a Democratic dominated General Assembly, Connecticut only recently instituted the largest tax increase in state history, and the state still can’t balance its books. Mr. Malloy apparently thought he was in competition with New Jersey Governor Chris Christie; so long as he maintained lower governmental costs than Mr. Christie, Connecticut would not lose jobs in the region. Now South Carolina is poaching Connecticut businesses. What a surprise? 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

dmoelling said…
To beat a dead horse, Carolinas commercial electricty rates are around $0.09 per kilowatt/hour while CT are $0.14 per kilowatt/hour.

There are similar differences for health care, housing costs etc.

CT Pols always try to compare us to NY/RI/MA but large companies compete nationwide so this is not accurate.
9:23 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."
17 comments
Read more

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

  Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.   In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.   The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."   "Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.   “No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more