Skip to main content

Clinton Stock Up, Obama Stock Down

(Inhale!) The most popular politician in the nation today is (Exhale slowly) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to a recent Bloomberg National Poll.

“Nearly two-thirds of Americans hold a favorable view of her and one-third are suffering a form of buyer’s remorse, saying the U.S. would be better off now if she had become president in 2008 instead of Barack Obama.”
The Tea Party figures are perhaps the most surprising:

“A plurality of Tea Party supporters -- 44 percent -- say the U.S. would be better off with Hillary Clinton as president, even though 59 percent of those respondents have an unfavorable impression of her.

“’She’s a more stable person who gets results,’ said Joseph Cherney, 67, a retired Republican automotive purchasing worker from Mineral Ridge, Ohio. ‘The president we have now isn’t much of a president because he really doesn’t do anything. He’s pompous and arrogant.’”
Labels:

Comments

dmoelling said…
Hillary has done a terrible job as Secretary of State in a very challenging time (Arab Revolts, Iranian trouble making, etc.)

Some of it may be Obamas fault and poor relations with other Obama appointees, but still she is no distinguished statesman yet.

In fact her only experience was as First Lady, author of HillaryCare, and one term as NYS senator. This isn't much different from Obama. They both benefited from fawning press coverage.

My God, can't we demand that our candidates have some real experience? We did in the Past!

Washington, Grant, Hayes, Eisenhower (Generals)

Teddy Roosevelt (Lots of jobs)
FDR (Sec. Navy, other)
Hoover (Mining Engineer, Author, Relief Organizer)
Truman (Artillery Officer, Retailer, Government)

Even Carter had some (Naval Officer, Governor)
8:54 AM
Don Pesci said…
I agree with much of what you’ve said. The Secretary of State is always a creature of the president and on occasion of Foggy Bottom. The point about electing candidates with business rather than political experience is important. We will not be reaching outside the political box for candidates here in Connecticut until the prejudice in favor of candidates with political experience disappears from editorial board rooms. Rigorously applied, this odd doctrine would have squelched the career of, say, Chis Dodd in its crib. Both the Courant and the New York Time almost uniformly frown on candidates who have business rather than political experience. A review of endorsements over the past 30 years would depress both of us. And then, of course, the connection between money and parties has been snapped; most incumbent politicians are self-financing, and they have their own political operations. This weakens party discipline, even as it gives incumbents an insuperable advantage over their opponents, when the opponent is not a politician-for-life. I don’t see this changing.
10:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."
17 comments
Read more

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e
Post a Comment
Read more