Skip to main content

Malloy Takes Left Turn Into Cul De Sac: The Die Is Cast

The ghost of progressivism past has now formerly entered the body of Gov. Dannel Malloy, and to memorialize the occasion Eyewitness News Channel 3 titled a story following news of the governor’s “historic” tax increases -- “Malloy Proposes Largest Tax Hike In History: Every Tax To Be Raised.”

The governor’s budget proposal represents the best of all possible worlds for Chris Donovan, the most faithful Speaker of the House state employee union workers ever had.

In presenting his budget to Connecticut’s left of center legislature, Mr. Malloy, dangerously inattentive to budget politics for the last decade, has now repeated the mistakes of former Gov. Jodi Rell. Forewarned that if she presented to the legislature a budget that satisfied half the spending ambitions of the legislature, she would end up with one that satisfied nearly all the ambitions of the Democratic dominated General Assembly, Mrs. Rell proceeded to do just that. All Republicans governors – AKA “spending firewalls” -- who began negotiations with ardent progressives in the legislature by giving the General Assembly half a loaf inevitably ended up with crumbs from the table. So it was said, so it happened – time after time.

Prior to his formal presentation of the budget, Mr. Malloy here and there gave hints that sacrifice would have to be shared among all the passengers aboard the Pequod. Now that the budget has taken shape, lashed taxpayers may well grouse, “Shared sacrifice me’arse!” No matter; these few quibblers now have no effective representation in a legislature crowded with special interests, spending addicted progressive Democrats and overpaid lobbyists, some of them former politicians waiting their chance to carve out for their clients special exemptions that will leave them half flayed.

The Malloy tax increases will be permanent, assuring surpluses -- IF Connecticut ever survives its rapid descent into unreality – for years to come. Spending cuts, however, will be but a temporary inconvenience to Connecticut’s only growing sector – public employees. The spending cuts in Malloy’s budget can always be restored; indeed, anxious consumers of tax dollars need only wait for new increased revenue streams to fill temporarily reduced reservoirs. There are plenty of new feeder streams in Mr. Malloy’s progressive budget. The tax increases proposed by Malloy, on the other hand, will never be cut. When, in Connecticut’s recent history, have tax increases been reduced? The prospect of permanent tax increases and temporary spending reductions has brought a bloom, very much like a blush, to Mr. Donovan’s pale cheek. Additionally, it has put a spring in the step of Republicans who hope to fill the seats left empty by previous Malloy appointments.

We are told by progressives – Mr. Malloy counts himself among their number – that Connecticut’s budget ecology has been made more progressive by the addition of an earned income tax credit. There is not one political commentator in the state who is aware that the income tax credit, previously called a negative income tax, was first propounded by Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman as a policy instrument designed to REPLACE the welfare bureaucracy. As an add-on to Connecticut’s burgeoning public sector incubus, the income tax credit is little more than the final straw laid on a camel’s breaking back.

In The Malloy dispensation, the income tax credit has become simply another drain on a rational free market system, now near collapse. The same is true of charter schools: Initially, they were sold to the public as a free market alternative to public schools that were failing inner city children. In the absence of a voucher system that would allow parents to vote against failing schools by using vouchers as tickets of entry to functioning schools, the charter system was designed to REPLACE failing public schools. The charter system of schools in Connecticut, some of which have been extraordinarily successful, will soon be de-financed in an era of scarcity so that dollars once again may flow to failing public school systems.

It does not take progressives long to kill success. In his budget, Mr. Malloy has cast the die. The question yet to be answered is: Where is the resistance, and will it succeed?

Comments

dmoelling said…
If I read the news correctly a homeowner who makes $100K/yr and pays local property taxes will see his state income tax rise about 40%. This is a combination of altering the rules for the lowest marginal rate and raising the next levels plus eliminating the property tax credit.

Wow! If the Republicans cannot use that as a club what can they use.
Anonymous said…
The economy in this state is broken. Unemployment is over 9 % with little chance of recovery. Health care costs are the driver in state employee costs. It is time for all state employees and retirees to pay something….just like everyone else. As for the taxes: What did you expect- we were doomed when he won the election.
Anonymous said…
The income tax increase will cost my family thousands. Living on a MA border town
Goods and fuel will be purchased in Taxachucetts not CT and to quote the highest state paid employee “not one dime” more to CT on principle.
Anonymous said…
http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/04/migration-moving-wealthy-interactive-counties-map.html

You may want to check this link out and click on Fairfield Country.

In the next year I intend to be one of those leaving. Goodbye

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton, a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Dave Walker, Turning Around The Misery Index

Dave Walker, who is running for Lieutenant Governor on the Republican Party ticket, is recognized by most credible political observers as perhaps the most over qualified candidate for Lieutenant Governor in state history.
He is a member of the Accounting Hall of Fame and for ten years was the Comptroller General of the United States. When Mr. Walker talks about budgets, financing and pension viability, people listen.
Mr. Walker is also attuned to fine nuances in political campaigning. He is not running for governor, he says, because he had moved to Connecticut only four years ago and wishes to respect the political pecking order. Very few people in the state think that, were he governor, Mr. Walker would know less about the finance side of government than his budget chief.

Murphy Stumbles

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy has been roughly cuffed by some news outlets, but not by Vox, which published on April 16 a worshipful article on Connecticut’s Junior Senator, “The Senator of State: How Connecticut’s Chris Murphy, a rising Democratic star, would run the world.”
On April 15, The Federalist mentioned Murphy in an article entitled “Sen. Chris Murphy: China And The World Health Organization Did Nothing Wrong. The lede was a blow to Murphy’s solar plexus: “Democratic Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy exonerated China of any wrongdoing over the global pandemic stemming from the novel Wuhan coronavirus on Tuesday.
“’The reason that we’re in the crisis that we are today is not because of anything that China did, is not because of anything the WHO [World Health Organization] did,’ said Murphy during a prime-time interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper.”