Skip to main content

Malloy, Barnes Get Religion


"The Future ain't what it used to be" -- Yogi Berra

Ben Barnes, Governor Dannel Malloy’s budget guru, is a late convert to reality. But having overcome the progressive stiffness in his joints, Mr. Barnes, now rising from his knees, has got economic religion. One hopes that Mr. Barnes’ conversion to common sense rubs off on his boss.

Last June, pointing to an under-performing economy battered by a quarter century of mounting tax increases and tortuous federal and state regulations, Mr. Barnes explained to an astonished gaggle of news reporters that Connecticut should get used to frequent deficits. Even this partial confession astounded some members of Connecticut’s media who perhaps had been wondering why nearly all of the “balanced budgets” submitted by Mr. Malloy to a Democratic dominated General Assembly so quickly unbalanced themselves once Election Day had passed.


At the end of September, Mr. Barnes fessed up. Facing yet another billion dollar deficit just before the 2016 elections, Mr. Barnes capitulated to reality.

“Everybody’s belief that we would return to a normal business cycle has faded,” he confessed. The eupeptics in the Malloy administration thought during the governor’s first two years in office that Connecticut would quickly recover from the crippling national recession. Floored by previous recessions, Connecticut in the past had recovered and life in the state of steady habits had returned to normalcy. Actually, it took Connecticut nearly a decade to recover from its previous recession, largely because the imposition of the Lowell Weicker income tax in the midst of the recession extended the usual recovery period. The income tax, and more especially the poisonous notion that increased taxes, invariably followed in short order by increased spending, would enhance recovery, was attended by predictable consequences: anemic growth, mounting state debt, business flight and arcane theories presented by slick politicians to justify even higher taxes and more state spending.

“We, sort of, have changed our view,” Mr. Barnes continued. “I certainly have, and a lot of mainstream economists have changed their view.”

This is what happens when false solutions crash into reality; eventually, the collision wakes up even the most slumberous politicians, most of whom have been lulled to sleep by political exigencies of the moment, usually re-election prospects.

It is NEVER a bright idea to raise taxes during a recession; it is ALWAYS a dumb idea, attended by quite predictable consequences.

So then, Mr. Malloy -- now out gallivanting from sea to shining sea and bestowing his blessings on out-of-state Democratic office holders, part of his duty as Chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, while Connecticut huffs along mired in a prolonged recession – and Mr. Barnes finally have come to the realization that further tax increases are both unlikely and unwise. Mr. Malloy, the author of the largest tax increase in state history, years ago pledged – no new taxes, after which he imposed on his state the second largest tax increase in its history. The tax well has now run dry, and despite gargantuan tax increases during Mr. Malloy’s administration, Mr. Barnes finds himself facing yet another billion dollar plus budget deficit. Thanks to the ruinous progressive domestic economic policies of President Barack Obama, hedge funds in Connecticut are underperforming – and blowing a hole in Mr. Malloy’s budget; everyone in Connecticut is gazing wistfully at the exit signs; in response to Obamacare, large home-grown insurance companies are combining with their out-of-state insurance cousins, raising the possibility that insurance jobs will be lost in what used to be called the insurance capital of the world;  and even avant guard journalists are beginning to shake their heads sadly, wondering what the state might look like after the inevitable crack-up. Answer: It will be smaller, poorer and more dependent on fake political saviors. In both politics and religion, the worship of false gods leads downward.

As Yogi Berra used to say, the future ain’t what it used to be. Mr. Barnes who, along with Mr. Malloy, is now taxing hospitals because “that’s where the money is,” apparently now agrees with the late Mr. Berra’s apt description of life in Connecticut in the Malloy-Barnes era.

Here’s the downer: Mr. Malloy and all his political  imps and impets cannot pull Connecticut out of its nosedive without a course change. And he will not change course by making common cause with Republicans and what is left of a rational, moderate, Democratic Party.

He won’t do it. Why not?

Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p