Skip to main content

Mayor Mamdani

Mamdani

"Democracy,” H.L. Mencken wrote, “is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."

 

The general public in New York City will not know what they have got until Mayor Zohran Mamdani has been in office for a few years. The  logical consequences of policy decisions take  some time to mature, and even then political analysts will long after be  at loggerheads squaring circles. We are just now finding out, for instance, that U.S. Senator Adam Schiff is a monumental but successful liar many years after he and other prominent Democrats, hoping to sink a future presidential campaign of Donald Trump, floated an improbable story that Trump was in cahoots with Russian President Vladimir Putin to deny Hillary Clinton a fair shot at becoming the nation’s first female president.

 

The New York Post published, two days prior to the election on its opinion page, a piece titled “20 reasons to vote against NYC mayoral front-runner Zohran Mamdani.” Some political watchers who have been carefully monitoring Mamdani’s political ascendancy, taking notes and assembling his far left pronouncements, think Mamdani is, on account of his Marxist tendencies, uneducable. A thousand years as mayor may not budge him from his chosen path.

 

Here are a few of the Post’s reasons to vote against Mamdani:

 

1. He hates the police

 

Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani called the NYPD “racist, anti-queer and a major threat to public safety. His “apology” rings hollow, saying that it was for “the language that I used” — but not the sentiment. His plan for public safety would instead send “mental health teams” without police backup on 911 calls, because negotiation is key when you’re about to be shoved onto the subway tracks.

 

2. He really hates the police

 

The number of officers in the NYPD is at its lowest level in 20 years — below 34,000. Outgoing Mayor Eric Adams wanted to increase the ranks to 40,000 by 2028. Mamdani insists on no additions — and is noncommittal about shrinking the agency. He claims he doesn’t want to “defund this rogue agency” as he has said in the past. But then he suggests that’s exactly what he’d do. “It’s not a question of headcount. It’s a question of safety,” Mamdani said recently.

 

3. He hates the police — with a splash of antisemitism

 

“We have to make clear that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF,” Mamdani claimed. To Mamdani, a few collaborative training exercises between the Israel Defense Forces and the police department is (sic) a full-blown conspiracy theory. The NYPD draws on the experience of many groups (including for community outreach), but since Israel = Evil in Mamdani’s worldview, the program must end. Mamdani is right that we need to help the mentally ill living on our streets, but he doesn’t have a realistic plan. He says his outreach teams will provide counseling, but any treatment program will be voluntary. How can someone who is mentally ill make decisions in their best interest? We’ve seen this movie before. Mayor Bill de Blasio spent $1 billion on his wife’s Thrive initiative, which prioritized a phone hotline. When schizophrenics told city workers they didn’t want to go to a shelter, they were allowed to sleep on the floor of a subway station. Expect more of the same — and worse.

 

6. He’s never met a failed idea he didn’t like…

 

Among the failed ideas Mamdani warmly embraces is socialism tinged with a communist imperative – to seize the means of production -- an overweening ambition that, everywhere it has been implemented, has invariably led to an impoverishing state managed economy, increased government control of both culture and politics, and the withering away of democracy and  republican  governance. Communists since Karl Marx have always set their faces against tradition, history and reality.

 

Marx wrote in the epigrammatical notes to his Theses on Feuerbach," published by Engels after he died, "Philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it." The epigram is engraved on Marx’s tomb in the Eastern cemetery of Highgate Cemetery, North London, England.

 

Mamdani’s frequent mangling of his own easily produced recent comments on politics and culture should surprise no one. His point, like that of Marx, is not to interpret meaning but to abolish it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Casey Chadwick’s Uneasy Life after Death

Casey and her mother Wendy "I just started grief counseling. I'm always sad. I'm sad and in pain and I miss her." Wendy Hartling   Hartling is the mother of Casey Chadwick, murdered in 2015 by Jean Jacques , an illegal Haitian immigrant. Jacques was convicted of the murder of Chadwick in a New London Superior Court jury trial and sentenced by Judge Barbara Bailey Jongbloed to a 60 year term in prison. Since Jacques is 44 years of age, the sentence was, in effect, a life sentence. Connecticut Commentary coverage of the Chadwick murder may be found here , and here   and here . Jacques could not have been sentenced to death because Connecticut’s Democrat dominated General Assembly, under pressure from the state Supreme Court, had abolished Connecticut’s death penalty law in 2012 . The slaughter of Chadwick was particularly brutal. Her body had been found by a friend who, opening a door to a closet, discovered Chadwick stuffed in a dark corner drenched in blo...

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...