Skip to main content

How Socialist Are The Socialists?

Mamdani

The Trinity of American Socialism – Father Bernie Sanders, a Vermont socialist; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and gang, the second persona of the Trinity; and Mayor of New York City in waiting Zohran Mamdani – it is intimated by a breathless, neo-progressive Eastern Seaboard media, are together the new face of the born-again Democrat Party. Mamdani has been regarded by some as the indispensable spirit completing the leftist Trinity.

 

The new face of the Democrat Party in New York City recently met at the White House with arch nemesis, President Donald Trump, who was cordial enough to forbear calling Mamdani a communist.

 

There is nothing strange in all this. Trump has met cordially with President of Russian Vladimir Putin, a communist proto-Stalinist. Putin began his military barrage of Ukraine by asserting that Ukraine was not even a country, and he has been for years attempting to reduce the non-country, inoffensive to Russia, to rubble. President Xi Jinping of China -- the general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), and thus the paramount leader of China -- though less murderous than Chairman Mao, is still imposing on China’s Falun Gong a variant of cultural slavery. Falun Gong practices self-cultivation through the principles of Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance, all of which are treasonous in Zi’s estimation. In communist countries, no self-actualization, always regarded as traitorous to the state, may be allowed.

 

Having clasped hands and broken bread with Putin and Xi, it might have been awkward had Trump not extended the same courtesy to Mamdani, who has yet to set up a gulag in Brooklyn for plucked and plundered millionaires. Mamdani is young, exuberant, a socialist utopianist to be sure, but one whose hands are not crimson with blood.

 

In his largely successful overpromised campaign – a kind of soap-opera version of governing – Mamdani’s presence in Trump’s White House is yet another chapter in what promises to be an endless campaign. One imagines Trump may have drawn Mamdani away from the glare of the TV cameras and whispered in his ear, “Zoran, this need not go any further, but just between us, you will soon see there is a categorical difference between campaigning and governing. I hope that difference does not unsettle you too much.”

 

Already, according to the indispensable New York Post, the Big Apple’s priorities are being arranged. The city’s town council is demanding raises for its members and the governor as soon as Mamdani takes command on January 1: “The bill, if approved, would give council members their first raise in nearly a decade and swell their salary budget from $7.5 million to $8.8 million. They’d see their salaries jump from $148,500 to $172,500.” If approved, the bill would increase their salary budget from $7.5 million to $8.8 million.

 

Following Mamdani’s meeting with Trump, New York Governor Kathy Hochul breathed a deep sigh of relief. She told him, according to the New York Post, that “he needed to ensure Trump had ‘confidence’ in his leadership to keep the president from sending the National Guard into New York City.” Speaking of Mamdani, she said, “He has already hit the ground running. I have the confidence in him that I wanted the president to have as well: that we don’t need any interventions.”

 

Following the White House meeting with Trump, Mamdani called Hochul to thank her for her advice. She told the New York Post, “I thought he did everything he needed to do to make sure the president has confidence in his leadership.”

 

Her confidence in Mamdani no doubt is based on a workmanlike political supposition that campaign posturing and governing are separate operations. More often than not, the political position adopted by the winner of a campaign is a stern and unforgiving teacher. It is the office, and not merely the audience to which a politician addresses himself in a campaign – in Mamdani’s case, unswerving socialists - that makes or breaks a politician. Politics is a collaborative effort. Even hard-bitten socialists know that.

 

The Democrat Party has long since moved lock stock and barrel from liberalism to neo-progressivism, an admixture of social radicalism seasoned with a revamped Marxism that replaces class interests with a wildly exaggerated oppressor verses oppressed world view. Mamdani is its high priest in the nation’s Northeast corridor. The liberal residue in the Democrat Party is hoping that he is, in Hochul’s view, educable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Casey Chadwick’s Uneasy Life after Death

Casey and her mother Wendy "I just started grief counseling. I'm always sad. I'm sad and in pain and I miss her." Wendy Hartling   Hartling is the mother of Casey Chadwick, murdered in 2015 by Jean Jacques , an illegal Haitian immigrant. Jacques was convicted of the murder of Chadwick in a New London Superior Court jury trial and sentenced by Judge Barbara Bailey Jongbloed to a 60 year term in prison. Since Jacques is 44 years of age, the sentence was, in effect, a life sentence. Connecticut Commentary coverage of the Chadwick murder may be found here , and here   and here . Jacques could not have been sentenced to death because Connecticut’s Democrat dominated General Assembly, under pressure from the state Supreme Court, had abolished Connecticut’s death penalty law in 2012 . The slaughter of Chadwick was particularly brutal. Her body had been found by a friend who, opening a door to a closet, discovered Chadwick stuffed in a dark corner drenched in blo...

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...