Skip to main content

How Socialist Are The Socialists?

Mamdani

The Trinity of American Socialism – Father Bernie Sanders, a Vermont socialist; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and gang, the second persona of the Trinity; and Mayor of New York City in waiting Zohran Mamdani – it is intimated by a breathless, neo-progressive Eastern Seaboard media, are together the new face of the born-again Democrat Party. Mamdani has been regarded by some as the indispensable spirit completing the leftist Trinity.

 

The new face of the Democrat Party in New York City recently met at the White House with arch nemesis, President Donald Trump, who was cordial enough to forbear calling Mamdani a communist.

 

There is nothing strange in all this. Trump has met cordially with President of Russian Vladimir Putin, a communist proto-Stalinist. Putin began his military barrage of Ukraine by asserting that Ukraine was not even a country, and he has been for years attempting to reduce the non-country, inoffensive to Russia, to rubble. President Xi Jinping of China -- the general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), and thus the paramount leader of China -- though less murderous than Chairman Mao, is still imposing on China’s Falun Gong a variant of cultural slavery. Falun Gong practices self-cultivation through the principles of Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance, all of which are treasonous in Zi’s estimation. In communist countries, no self-actualization, always regarded as traitorous to the state, may be allowed.

 

Having clasped hands and broken bread with Putin and Xi, it might have been awkward had Trump not extended the same courtesy to Mamdani, who has yet to set up a gulag in Brooklyn for plucked and plundered millionaires. Mamdani is young, exuberant, a socialist utopianist to be sure, but one whose hands are not crimson with blood.

 

In his largely successful overpromised campaign – a kind of soap-opera version of governing – Mamdani’s presence in Trump’s White House is yet another chapter in what promises to be an endless campaign. One imagines Trump may have drawn Mamdani away from the glare of the TV cameras and whispered in his ear, “Zoran, this need not go any further, but just between us, you will soon see there is a categorical difference between campaigning and governing. I hope that difference does not unsettle you too much.”

 

Already, according to the indispensable New York Post, the Big Apple’s priorities are being arranged. The city’s town council is demanding raises for its members and the governor as soon as Mamdani takes command on January 1: “The bill, if approved, would give council members their first raise in nearly a decade and swell their salary budget from $7.5 million to $8.8 million. They’d see their salaries jump from $148,500 to $172,500.” If approved, the bill would increase their salary budget from $7.5 million to $8.8 million.

 

Following Mamdani’s meeting with Trump, New York Governor Kathy Hochul breathed a deep sigh of relief. She told him, according to the New York Post, that “he needed to ensure Trump had ‘confidence’ in his leadership to keep the president from sending the National Guard into New York City.” Speaking of Mamdani, she said, “He has already hit the ground running. I have the confidence in him that I wanted the president to have as well: that we don’t need any interventions.”

 

Following the White House meeting with Trump, Mamdani called Hochul to thank her for her advice. She told the New York Post, “I thought he did everything he needed to do to make sure the president has confidence in his leadership.”

 

Her confidence in Mamdani no doubt is based on a workmanlike political supposition that campaign posturing and governing are separate operations. More often than not, the political position adopted by the winner of a campaign is a stern and unforgiving teacher. It is the office, and not merely the audience to which a politician addresses himself in a campaign – in Mamdani’s case, unswerving socialists - that makes or breaks a politician. Politics is a collaborative effort. Even hard-bitten socialists know that.

 

The Democrat Party has long since moved lock stock and barrel from liberalism to neo-progressivism, an admixture of social radicalism seasoned with a revamped Marxism that replaces class interests with a wildly exaggerated oppressor verses oppressed world view. Mamdani is its high priest in the nation’s Northeast corridor. The liberal residue in the Democrat Party is hoping that he is, in Hochul’s view, educable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...