Skip to main content

Republicans Want an Independent Inspector General with Broad Powers


There are two kinds of corruption in our politics: hidden and revealed. Instances of corruption revealed are but the tiny tip of an iceberg.

 

If Connecticut’s one-party state could boast concerning its political victims, it might say it has successfully managed over the years to reduce revealed corruption by smothering it with a blanket of silence or, failing that, by moving corruption into the hidden column.

 

There are numerous ways of implanting corruption, an effort made much easier in an autocratic, one-party state. All one-party states are either autocracies – think Stalin or Mao – or political plutocracies, both systemically corrupt.

 

Democracy, as we misunderstand it here in the United States, is the chief victim of one-party states. The tumbril on the way to a political guillotine awaits all the beneficiaries of small “r” republican governance. If the halls of governance contain only one dispositive party for any length of time, corruption becomes irresistible.

 

Here is the State Republican Party caucus in the General Assembly inveighing against the one party state:

 

 In a press conference Thursday, Republicans exposed the series of ethical lapses in the state that erode public trust, calling for an expansion of the state's Inspector General (IG) role to investigate this waste, fraud, and abuse.

 

Nixed audits, voter and election fraud, reckless spending, state vehicle misuses, school construction scandals, Medicaid fraud, phony grant allocation processes, and more plague a system run entirely on one-party rule.

 

The authority of Connecticut’s Inspector General (IG) currently is severely foreshortened. The state’s IG is authorized only to investigate police authorities when they have discharged their firearms or when an arrest has been questioned.

 

According to the state GOP press release:

 

Republicans say the Inspector General should have broader investigative authority, ensuring that no official—regardless of political affiliation or position—is shielded from scrutiny. The proposed expanded responsibilities include:

•             Expand Inspector General (“IG”) responsibilities to investigate fraud, waste, and abuse in the expenditure or use of state resources

•             Review of Auditors’ reports on Agencies and investigate findings of fraud, waste, and abuse

•             Intake complaints, including from whistleblowers

•             Intake referrals from the Auditors and state agencies

•             Refer cases to state/federal authorities

•             Recommend policies to limit fraud/waste

•             Review/make recommendations on legislation

•             Submit reports to the General Assembly annually starting in 2026

•             Seek civil recovery of funds

 

In their press release, Republicans mentioned – by way of example – only three recent ethical controversies that have bubbled up in news reports:

 

•             CSCU Spending Scandal: CSCU President Terrence Cheng and other leaders faced scrutiny for reckless spending while students endured tuition hikes and the system claimed funding shortages. Cheng remains employed.

•             DSS Audit Cancellation (Diamantis/Ziogas case): Serious transparency and accountability concerns tied to the case of Kosta Diamantis and former Democrat Rep. Christopher Ziogas and questions involving an audit canceled on the watch of Former DSS Commissioner and current OHS Commissioner Deidre Gifford.

•             Social Equity Council Grants: Questions remain concerning the fairness and transparency of grant allocations to community organizations.

 

Under Republican auspices, all the above – and more – would be grist for an independent IG mill., and the very presence of an independent IG reviewing citizen complaints and recommending the proper disposition of unethical/illegal acts by Connecticut’s largely Democrat controlled one party state would be a deterrent to the natural autocratic inclinations of a ruling party occasionally questioned by an occasionally independent state media.

 

By the way, a wide-awake state media should favor the proposal of an independent IG that would induce among politicians a sense of humility and shame. Such an office would lend heft to many stories that cover only the tip of a mountainous floating political iceberg.

 

 

594

 

_________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Casey Chadwick’s Uneasy Life after Death

Casey and her mother Wendy "I just started grief counseling. I'm always sad. I'm sad and in pain and I miss her." Wendy Hartling   Hartling is the mother of Casey Chadwick, murdered in 2015 by Jean Jacques , an illegal Haitian immigrant. Jacques was convicted of the murder of Chadwick in a New London Superior Court jury trial and sentenced by Judge Barbara Bailey Jongbloed to a 60 year term in prison. Since Jacques is 44 years of age, the sentence was, in effect, a life sentence. Connecticut Commentary coverage of the Chadwick murder may be found here , and here   and here . Jacques could not have been sentenced to death because Connecticut’s Democrat dominated General Assembly, under pressure from the state Supreme Court, had abolished Connecticut’s death penalty law in 2012 . The slaughter of Chadwick was particularly brutal. Her body had been found by a friend who, opening a door to a closet, discovered Chadwick stuffed in a dark corner drenched in blo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding North Korea Through Dramaturgy

The U.S. military is sending the Vinson Strike Group, including the carrier and two guided-missile destroyers, to operate in the Western Pacific Ocean in response to Pyongyang’s recent missile tests. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, asked about the strike force, issued a terse statement: “The United States has spoken enough about North Korea. We have no further comment.” Is this a post-Syrian bombing mission? Will the US take out North Korea’s missile launching sites, possibly with the unspoken concurrence of China? Never let a bombing go to waste. There are some in the United States who think any such incident should be used to rid North Korea of that runty little totalitarian cock-of-the-walk who keeps his countrymen starved, in fear and at his knees. Since we only have one chance, they say, go for the clean sweep -- no more Kims. Connecticut Commentary is reprinting an earlier piece about the Kims here. Best read with a glass of port.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."
17 comments
Read more