National Review, a magazine founded by Bill Buckley in 1955, has given a thumbs down to National Public Radio’s recent documentary, ‘The Incomparable Mr. Buckley’, and no wonder. The documentary barely scratches the surface of the man who wrote in the inaugural first edition of National Review, “A conservative is someone who stands athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.”
Buckley was quick witted and aphoristic in his entertaining
confrontations with a leftist media determined, for ideological reasons, to
misunderstand him: “I would rather be governed by the first two thousand people
in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand people on the
faculty of Harvard University (Meet the Press, 1965)”
Buckley was determined to slough off artificial impositions
placed upon him by a power thirsty national government: “I will not cede more
power to the state. I will not willingly cede more power to anyone, not to the
state, not to General Motors, not to the CIO. I will hoard my power like a
miser, resisting every effort to drain it away from me. I will then use my
power, as I see fit. I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to
God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of
political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth. That is a program of
sorts, is it not? It is certainly program enough to keep conservatives busy, and
liberals at bay. And the nation free. (Up
from Liberalism, 1959).”
He was more than a man for all seasons. The seasons jostled
in him like the strains of Bach’s Goldberg Variations, which Buckley played on
a harpsichord at Yale University before a large and admiring audience. A Bach
admirer described the master’s Goldberg Variations this way: “The Goldberg
Variations, originally composed for the harpsichord, center around this most
sublime keyboard aria, lightly sprinkled with grace notes and embellishments,
but at its core simple and achingly beautiful.”
Buckley never shied from Baroque musical works or
wonderfully titillating Baroque wordplay. The 20th century was
Buckley’s playground and, though the century was confusing and bloody, there
was much in it for masterful satirists to probe.
Buckley was a serious Catholic, a serious husband and a
serious controversialist who habitually drew into his own private corner people
who were seriously opposed to both conservatism, as Buckley understood it, and
libertarianism. A late Buckley collection of his wittings – “Happy Days Were Here Again” – is
subtitled “Reflections of a Libertarian Journalist.”
The New York Times tells us, “The PBS
documentary ‘The Incomparable Mr. Buckley’ implicitly and explicitly asks: What
would William F. Buckley think of today’s Republican Party?”
Both the PBS documentary and the New York Times review of
the documentary are pretty much what one would expect of PBS and the New York
Times. Asked what the Times might have done had Buckley won his contest for
Mayor of New York City against John Lindsay, Buckley quipped that some
foresighted Times editorialist might have hung a net under the editorial window
of the paper to catch the falling bodies. And PBS carried Buckley’s “Firing Line” interview show for 33
years.
Buckley is uncoverable in a brief political documentary because
there is so much of him -- all of it very Bachian.
The best source on Buckley is Buckley, and Happy Days Were Here Again is infinitely more readable than a tired, politically disingenuous, documentary that brings nothing new to the man or the viewer. The Times had better pray – if the practical atheist writers and editors at the Times writers know how to pray – that no articulate conservative or libertarian writer in the country, most of whom have fallen out of Buckley’s brain, are preparing a documentary on the Times’ review of PBS’s less than generous or grateful documentary.
Comments