Skip to main content

Bill Buckley -- Skip the Doc, Read The Books


National Review, a magazine founded by Bill Buckley in 1955, has given a thumbs down to National Public Radio’s recent documentary, ‘The Incomparable Mr. Buckley’, and no wonder. The documentary barely scratches the surface of the man who wrote in the inaugural first edition of National Review, “A conservative is someone who stands athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.”

Buckley was quick witted and aphoristic in his entertaining confrontations with a leftist media determined, for ideological reasons, to misunderstand him: “I would rather be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand people on the faculty of Harvard University (Meet the Press, 1965)”

Buckley was determined to slough off artificial impositions placed upon him by a power thirsty national government: “I will not cede more power to the state. I will not willingly cede more power to anyone, not to the state, not to General Motors, not to the CIO. I will hoard my power like a miser, resisting every effort to drain it away from me. I will then use my power, as I see fit. I mean to live my life an obedient man, but obedient to God, subservient to the wisdom of my ancestors; never to the authority of political truths arrived at yesterday at the voting booth. That is a program of sorts, is it not? It is certainly program enough to keep conservatives busy, and liberals at bay. And the nation free. (Up from Liberalism, 1959).”

He was more than a man for all seasons. The seasons jostled in him like the strains of Bach’s Goldberg Variations, which Buckley played on a harpsichord at Yale University before a large and admiring audience. A Bach admirer described the master’s Goldberg Variations this way: “The Goldberg Variations, originally composed for the harpsichord, center around this most sublime keyboard aria, lightly sprinkled with grace notes and embellishments, but at its core simple and achingly beautiful.”

Buckley never shied from Baroque musical works or wonderfully titillating Baroque wordplay. The 20th century was Buckley’s playground and, though the century was confusing and bloody, there was much in it for masterful satirists to probe.

Buckley was a serious Catholic, a serious husband and a serious controversialist who habitually drew into his own private corner people who were seriously opposed to both conservatism, as Buckley understood it, and libertarianism. A late Buckley collection of his wittings – “Happy Days Were Here Again” – is subtitled “Reflections of a Libertarian Journalist.”

The New York Times tells us, “The PBS documentary ‘The Incomparable Mr. Buckley’ implicitly and explicitly asks: What would William F. Buckley think of today’s Republican Party?”

Both the PBS documentary and the New York Times review of the documentary are pretty much what one would expect of PBS and the New York Times. Asked what the Times might have done had Buckley won his contest for Mayor of New York City against John Lindsay, Buckley quipped that some foresighted Times editorialist might have hung a net under the editorial window of the paper to catch the falling bodies. And PBS carried Buckley’s “Firing Line” interview show for 33 years.

Buckley is uncoverable in a brief political documentary because there is so much of him -- all of it very Bachian.

The best source on Buckley is Buckley, and Happy Days Were Here Again is infinitely more readable than a tired, politically disingenuous, documentary that brings nothing new to the man or the viewer. The Times had better pray – if the practical atheist writers and editors at the Times writers know how to pray – that no articulate conservative or libertarian writer in the country, most of whom have fallen out of Buckley’s brain, are preparing a documentary on the Times’ review of PBS’s less than generous or grateful documentary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...