Skip to main content

Gavin the Brave

Newsom

Carthago delenda est,” Carthage must be destroyed
– the motto of Cato the Elder and the Roman army during the Punic wars

National Review reports, “California Governor Gavin Newsom will conduct tonight’s Christmas tree–lighting at California’s state capitol virtually, amid threats from pro-Palestinian protesters… The Sacramento Regional Coalition for Palestinian Rights announced that it would protest at the state capitol on Tuesday night — the same night Newsom was set to direct the annual Christmas tree-lighting ceremony. The group told KCRA Channel 3 that it wants to ‘out Governor Gavin Newsom for hiding from the public because he doesn’t want to face their anger at his shameful stance in regard to the genocide in Gaza.’”

Perhaps President of China Xi Jinping can show Newsom the way. The Governor of California need not scurry to a place of safety because he wishes to avoid a public headline-generating backlash as a result of a strenuous moral opposition against a genocidal Hamas, both the governing authority of Gaza and, more importantly, a terrorist organization in the pay of Iran. Xi has been committing his opposition to the Chinese Gulag for decades.

It is not altogether clear that Palestine Gazans support Hamas. Indeed, it is not altogether certain that Iran, part Persian and part Islamic, supports its own revolutionary Shia government. Neither Iran, nor Hamas, nor other of Iran’s terrorist proxies, favors democratic solutions to political, cultural, or religious problems. And, of course, Iran, the principal troublemaker in the Middle East, wishes to push the state of Israel into the sea.

Protestors on college campuses throughout the United States, some of them dripping with ivy, have expressed their solidarity with Iran, Hamas terrorists, Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon, Yameni terrorists, and peace seeking members of the United Nations, whose objections to Israel’s declaration of war against Hamas terrorists infesting Gaza is more subtle than Iran’s.

Also subtle is U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders’ objection to Israel’s declaration of war on Hamas.

Sanders, a Jewish socialist Senator from Vermont born in 1941, was 4 years old when anti-Nazi allies bombed Dresden in Germany. The bombing of Dresden, necessary or not, helped to bring an end to World War II and established, in the aftermath of the war, what one might call the peace of the victors.

Sanders believes that Israel’s war on Hamas is both necessary and just, and certainly Gaza is no Dresden. Israel is determined to destroy Hamas, and it has established offensive strategies that will, as far as possible, allow Gazans some measure of security against military attack not present when Dresden was utterly destroyed. These measures were in place before Sanders and President Joe Biden loudly advised Israeli leaders against the indiscriminate killing of innocent civilians, such as happened when Hamas ruthlessly attacked Israel civilians on October 7.

Israel’s non-negotiable demands are these: Israel must win the war against Hamas and its supporters, and “winning” means that Hamas, both the government of Gaza and a terrorist organization financed and sponsored by Iran, must be uprooted and destroyed. The terrorist infrastructure in Gaza – religious, cultural and political – must be supplanted. If there is to be in Israel a so called “two state solution,” Palestinian and Israeli, one of the states cannot be Hamas -- or any other Iranian supported terrorist proxy. No nation can long survive by housing in its bosom a foreign supported terrorist group that has taken active measures to militarily destroy the nation.

These are demands that will be enforced, according to Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, whether or not the friends and enemies of Israel agree that the extirpation of Hamas is necessary.

Cleverly, the anti-Zionists insist that Israel should pause in its efforts to destroy Hamas for humanitarian reasons, and they do not make sharp distinctions between a pause in military action – for instance, a momentary cessation of hostile military action to allow for an exchange of prisoners – and an undefined cessation of hostilities.

Every formal declaration of war is a crossing of the Rubicon.

If you are a nation that has declared war against a hostile state or nation, you will want to concentrate your firepower, material or rhetorical, on one overriding goal – winning the war.

Under certain conditions, diplomacy works. More usually, wars, not diplomacy, decide the future of a nation, but only for those who have won the war. The United States and its allies could and did negotiate terms of peace with Germany and Japan after both nations had surrendered to the allies in 1945 – not before.

Iran has been sponsoring terrorism in the Middle East for decades, some would say successfully. The havoc Iran has caused has not disturbed a single hair in the snowy white beard of the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader since 1989.

Peace between Gazans and Israel is not possible while Iran sponsored terrorists continue to harass the civilian population of Israel. Hamas must be destroyed. And it would help a great deal if the policy of the United States with respect to Iran were less accommodating than it appears to be. The armada President Joe Biden has sent to the Middle East has been badly used because it has hardly been used, apart from blowing up a few empty buildings to the north of Israel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...