Skip to main content

A Poetic Understanding of President Biden


President Joe Biden seems at first glance to be a complex political creature. He was elected to the presidency, after little public scrutiny, as a moderate Democrat, but has ended his first term in office as what some would consider a raging neo-progressive, and he has had his foot to that pedal throughout his first term in office.

But Biden is not complex. He is a simple man, a copyist and a plagiarist. Such men borrow the characters of others. They live, so to speak, in the skins of others. T.S. Elliot, in The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, described the type perfectly:

No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;

Am an attendant lord, one that will do

To swell a progress, start a scene or two…

Deferential, glad to be of use,

Politic, cautious, and meticulous;

Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;

At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—

Almost, at times, the Fool.

Biden is entirely unoriginal. Biden’s first term in office may be viewed as a somewhat distorted and exaggerated version of Obama’s presidency. Biden, Obama’s Vice President, is simply completing a work of destruction begun by Obama, whose two terms in office were principally a work of destruction aimed at Reaganism and ascendant conservatism.

Biden’s critics are correct in supposing he has, to put it politely, age problems. But his chief problem, now and throughout his half century in politics, is that he always was an “attendant lord.” As president, he is, almost defiantly, no longer “deferential and glad to be of use.” A modest active politician of fifty years standing would be an oxymoron, a contradiction of terms.

Biden’s “high sentences” early in his career were those of others. And even today a lack of a character and high principle, his imitative nature, his plagiaristic instincts, make him “a bit obtuse; at times, indeed almost ridiculous – almost, at times, the Fool.”

Foolishness involves the adoption of means ill fitted to ends. In the not too distant future, objective historians may regard the Obama years as an episodic interruption of a fructifying conservative movement, which is nothing other than common sense and vibrant traditional principles applied pragmatically to culture and politics.

Biden’s son Hunter without question has been exceedingly foolish, and there are indications the son was acting on behalf of his father in amassing personal wealth from foreign nations such as Vladimir Putin’s Russia and Xi Jinping’s China, both countries that have successfully positioned themselves as permanent enemies of the United States. China is not merely an economic competitor, and Russia, under Putin, little more than a Stalinist want-to-be, appears to be bidding farewell to the country’s status as a Western European power.

CNN – no supporter of Trump – last week reported that President Biden was deeply “obsessed” and increasingly “irritated” by the media’s focus on his son. Even his aides, the report indicated, steer clear of the subject, and Hunter Biden’s legal predicament is assiduously avoided during campaign meetings.

It is understandable why Hunter’s father would rather the media talk about the weather, the prime subject of conversation when his father met on numerous occasions with his son’s business associates, according to Biden apologists.

All the Bidens, most especially those who had personally profited from Hunter’s questionable business associations, likely wish “Biden the younger” had not left his lap-top-from-Hell in a computer repair shop. That politically poisonous laptop proved to be the source of much media speculation on the eve of a presidential reelection campaign against former President Donald Trump, mortally wounded, Democrats hope, by scores of felony counts that will be percolating through the courts, some court watchers suppose, well beyond the presidential election in 2024.

Nothing gets better with age: not the health, mental and otherwise, of 80 year-old attendant lords; not percolating court cases; not seemingly impassable divisions between political parties; not increasingly politicized judicial systems; not presumably objective media outlets… nothing… nothing…

What a pity the Bidens, father and son, had not spent more time with Shakespeare and less with wealth acquisition by means of Burisma Holdings Limited.

As they say,

when the age is in, the wit is out.

Much Ado About Nothing (3.5.31-2)

Nature in you stands on the very verge

Of her confine: you should be rul’d and led

By some discretion that discerns your state

Better than you yourself.

King Lear (2.4.140-44)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...