Skip to main content

Urban Criminal Violence, Whose Problem?

Bronin -- Hartford Courant

The headline in a Hartford paper screams, “Mayors take on gun violence: Leaders from some of the state’s biggest cities want crackdown on firearm crimes by repeat offenders.”

One of the cities is Hartford, the Capital city of Connecticut whose mayor, Luke Bronin, recently announced he will not be running for office again.

The mayors,” according to the paper, “are focusing on a narrow set of criminals – often already convicted felons – who are responsible for a large share of the shootings in Hartford, Waterbury, Bridgeport and New Haven.

In Waterbury according to the report, “40% of those arrested for shootings were in probation and 30% were on pretrial release.”

How long, urbanites may want to know, has this been going on? How long have police chiefs in large Connecticut cities known that 39% of criminals arrested in shootings were on pretrial release, 14% on probation, and 5% on parole? During his tenure in office, did Hartford’s police chief ever mention to the departing mayor that the same small knot of criminals in the city over which he presided for 7 years were committing the preponderance of the city’s’ crimes? Surely the subject must have arisen, perhaps more than once, over a donut and coffee at the mayor’s residence.

Most rational people in Hartford probably know that the fault lies not with the police, who know who the repeat offenders are, but with other public officials, many of them politicians who for political reasons seem to have decided over the years that fair punishments no longer deter crime.

Bronin is not a political newbie. Prior to becoming Mayor of Hartford for 7 years, he served in the administration of President Barack Obama as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. He was tapped by Dannel Malloy to serve as the Governor’s General Council, after which he became Hartford’s 67th Mayor.

“As the governor’s chief lawyer,” the outgoing mayor’s official biography notes, “Bronin was deeply involved in developing policies to combat veterans’ homelessness, pass common sense gun laws (emphasis mine), expand economic opportunities, reform our criminal justice system (emphasis mine), and protect our environment.”

Somewhere on his political journey, Bronin must have developed a nodding acquaintance with the notion of just punishment as an efficacious crime deterrent; so too with the other mayors of Connecticut’s crime ridden cities.

Democrats have controlled the mayor’s office in Hartford – with one exception, that of Mayor Ann Uccello, 1967-71 – for 68 years. Postmodern progressive notions that condign sentencing does not deter criminal activity and that guns, not criminals, kill people are relatively new penological fables.

Like Chicago and California, Connecticut is generally recognized as a gun control state. And state laws regarding gun control, touted as often as possible by Connecticut’s two U.S. Senators, Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, have not stemmed criminal violence – not gun violence -- in their state’s largest cities.

The governors of Connecticut’s major cities mentioned above, all Democrats, are now turning – better late than never – a new page on urban violence, and Governor Ned Lamont is on board. “We are talking about that small group of repeat offenders that provide 90% of the shootings and 90% of the murders. And that is avoidable," Lamont said.

“If you’ve got a history of serious offenses, and you commit a new firearms offense, you should have to post at least 30% of your bail, the bond that's set, in order to get out on pretrial release,” Bronin said.

These were always good ideas, spurned in large part by progressive justices, Democrat legislators, and left leaning professors of penology such as former co-chair of the General Assembly Judiciary Committee Mike Lawlor, Malloy’s prison czar and creator of Connecticut’s get-out-of-jail-early-release credits.

While it is rarely mentioned in commentary pieces and editorials among Connecticut’s surviving investigative reporters, the root of social disintegration in large cities lies in the destruction of the family unit. Persistent poverty in urban areas persists because the state for years has been financing marginal poverty through its welfare system, what this writer has called a fool’s gold gilded cage that prevents the general public from seizing upon real solutions to urban poverty.

Chris Powell, now retired as Managing Editor and Editorial Page Editor of the combative Journal Inquirer, continues to hammer away in his columns at various false solutions. Powell, very early on, along with Daniel Patrick Moynihan among others, identified urban poverty’s main culprit as the absence of traditional family structures, most importantly the absence of responsible fathers in households: “For starters, most children in the cities have little if any parenting. More than 80% are living without a father in their home, many having no contact with their fathers at all. Many of their mothers are badly stressed by single parenting and trying to make a living, even with welfare benefits. Some have drug problems. Some are so addled that their children are being raised by a grandparent.”

Forcing convicted criminals to post 30% bail when they are rearrested may not be nearly enough to reverse-engineer a half decade of destructive “solutions” to urban anarchy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."