Skip to main content

Biden, Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation, And The Mop-Up Operation

Twin Towers post 9/11

There are few things worse than generals pretending to be presidents. President Harry Truman fired one of these, General Douglas MacArthur, in 1951. Generals in the Pentagon have since taken the lesson and learned to defer. In the postmodern period, the danger comes from presidents pretending to be generals and generals conniving at the pretense.

That is what happened when President Joe Biden closed Bagram Airfield, also known as Bagram Air Base, the largest U.S. military base in Afghanistan, in order to meet a self-imposed withdrawal deadline of American troops from Afghanistan by August 31. The depleted military, their attentions diverted elsewhere, also left behind billions of dollars’ worth of sophisticated hardware and, if one any longer is to believe figures issued by the White House, 100-200 American citizens and thousands of Afghanis Biden pledged not to leave behind in the grip of Taliban terrorists. 

Some critics say the unnecessary deadline, red-penned by Taliban terrorists, whose relations in the past with ISIS terrorists has been cordial, should not have been announced until Biden had reinforced the military with additional troops and used Bagram to ferry out of Afghanistan first American citizens, second anyone in Afghanistan who had helped Americans to keep the peace for more than twenty years, third the billions of dollars in military equipment Biden was forced by thoughtless planning to deed to Taliban terrorists, and lastly  American military troops.

Biden’s approval ratings have plummeted, and sweat beads are beginning to form on the foreheads of national and state Democrats. Among the Republicans loyal opposition, moderate Democrats and unaffiliateds, there is some chatter that the Truman option should be deployed against any general in the Pentagon who had advised Biden to do what he so obstinately did.

Connecticut’s two U.S. Senators, Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, are less interested in affixing blame for Biden’s poorly executed withdrawal from Afghanistan than in smoothing the rough edges of the messy mop-up operation.

It seems that Taliban terrorists are expected to assist Biden in rescuing former friends of Americans in Afghanistan from, well, Taliban terrorists. Friendly eyes and ears on the ground in Afghanistan, post pull-out, have been waylaid and incapacitated by the Taliban and Biden’s subservient bows in their direction.

This is the second time Afghanis have witnessed a takeover of Kabul by the Taliban. In the Pashto language, “Taliban” means “student”.  In September 1996, the Taliban “killed the country’s president,” according to The Counter Terrorism Guide, “and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The Taliban’s first move was to institute a strict interpretation of Quranic instruction and jurisprudence. In practice, this meant often merciless policies on the treatment of women, political opponents of any type, and religious minorities.”

In the absence of reliable on the ground intelligence, neither Biden nor Pentagon generals can know how many Americans have been left behind the Taliban cordon at Kabul Airport, now in the hands of the terrorists, along with much of Afghanistan. Of this number we cannot know how many hapless Americans or American helpmates during the now concluded “war in Afghanistan” have freely chosen to remain in the country among terrorists, Islamic purists, and their ISIS comrades who in the past have been very unfriendly and rude towards Americans and their helpmates. One imagines Americans caught in the Taliban trap and Afghans unfriendly to the Taliban, all of them on the ground students of recent history, would not willingly or freely expose themselves to the Pashto religious intolerance of the recently reinstated Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

The new Emirate of Afghanistan is the old Emirate of Afghanistan, a pan-national Islamic gang that includes Pashtun Sunnis in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and other places in an area of the world where salafists, deemed heroes and martyrs of the faith, suicide vests strapped to their chests, blow up Parisian restaurants and heretical newspaper offices – not to mention the Pentagon and the twin towers in New York City.

The United States has had an active presence in Afghanistan longer than 20 years. US attention was first drawn to Afghanistan in 1980, more than 40 years ago, when Leonid Brezhnev’s Soviet Union, having failed to quell armed dissent, invaded the country during the Carter administration. The Soviet invasion lasted 10 years. An attempt to suppress armed dissent and to install a communist puppet regime in the country finally failed when the US began arming the Taliban opposition.

“In their wake,” according to a brief account of the US entré into the Afghan maelstrom authored by the Department of State Office of the Historian, “ the Soviets left a shattered country in which the Taliban, an Islamic fundamentalist group, seized control, later providing Osama bin Laden with a training base from which to launch terrorist operations worldwide.”

Vladimir Putin, Russia’s answer to the Soviet’s Leonid Brezhnev, is now having the last laugh on the United States, and he who laughs last laughs best.

Biden’s faltering presidency returns the postmodern world back to 1980, and there is no cleaning up his mess. The only question worth asking now is – when will Islamic fundamentalist terror resume?

Sooner, Murphy and Blumenthal should assume, rather than later.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p