Optimists who believe in free markets – the opposite of which are unfree, illiberal, highly regulated markets – knew, shortly after Coronavirus slammed into the United States from Wuhan, China, that the virus and the free market were inseparably connected. The more often autocratic governors restricted the public market, the more often jobs would be lost, and the loss of jobs and entrepreneurial capital everywhere would necessarily punch holes in state budgets. In many cases, the holes were pre-punched by governors and legislators who, prior to the Coronavirus panic, had failed to understand the direct connection between high taxes, which depletes creative capital, and sluggish economies. For the last thirty years, it has taken Connecticut ten years to recover from national recessions.
The dialectic of getting and spending is a matter of simple
observation and logic: the more governments get in taxes, the more they spend;
the more they spend, the greater the need for taxation. Excessive spending –
more properly, the indisposition to cut spending – takes a toll on capital
formation and use, which leads to business flight and all its attendant evils,
such as high unemployment, entrepreneurial stagnation and lingering recessions.
There would come a time, post Coronavirus, free market
optimists thought, when states would begin to pivot from artificially
constricting the economy by means of gubernatorial emergency power declarations
to a much desired return to organic normalcy. That pivot already has been put in motion by governors
in many conservative woke states.
The entire northeast has for many years been the victim of the past successes of Democrat politics, which involves harvesting votes by buying them, usually by dispensing tax dollars and power-sharing to reliable political constituencies. Large major cities in Connecticut – Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven, have been held captive by Democrats for nearly a half century. During the last few elections – President Donald Trump’s 2016 election, disappointing to Clintonistas, being the most conspicuous exception to the rule – Democrats have been able to cobble together epicentric majorities in most power centers in the northeast, relying upon large cities to carry them over the election goal line. This strategy has had, until now, little to do with political ideology and a great deal to do with campaign acumen and a leftward lurch on social issues long abandoned by Connecticut Republicans. Presence in politics has always been more important than little understood ideologies, and Connecticut Republicans have been absent without leave on social issues for decades.
Over a period of time, Democrats, by focusing on social
issues, have managed to move what used to be called the “vital center” in
national politics much further to the left. And this ideological shift has adversely
impacted 1) Republicans who seem unable or unwilling to gain a foothold on
important social issues, 2) liberal “Kennedy” Democrats now caught in political
limbo following a recent neo-progressive upsurge, and 3) disadvantaged groups, once
the mainstay of liberal politics in the ‘”Camelot” era of President Kennedy, now
frozen politically and socially in empathy cement, finding no way forward into
what once had been a robust middle class.
There is no question, even among progressives who wish to
move money from privileged, disappointingly white millionaires to despairing
non-white urban voters, that a vibrant economy lifts all the boats. The
distribution of zero dollars is zero, and there simply is not enough money in
the bulging bank accounts of Connecticut’s millionaires to finance the state’s
welfare system for more than a few years – even if it were possible for
eat-the-millionaires, white, privileged, neo-progressives to expropriate ALL
the surplus riches of Connecticut’s “Gold Coast” millionaires and send the
dispossessed to work in re-education farms in West Hartford. No middle class tide,
no lift. Yesterday, today and tomorrow, it will be Connecticut’s dwindling
middle class that will carry the “privileged” white man’s burden.
Like other governors in the Northeast, Ned Lamont, who
stumbled into Connecticut politics without much political experience, has
become, thanks to Coronavirus and the inveterate cowardice of legislators, a plenary
governor the likes of which the Republic has not seen since American patriots –
the word “patriot” was first used as a reproach against benighted revolutionaries
by monarchists – chased agents of King George out of THEIR country.
Both Lamont and his friend Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York
have worn their plenary powers well, but the Coronavirus scourge is receding,
and Cuomo has “slipped in blood.” Worst of all, representative government in
some states appears to be making a comeback, and people are beginning to resent
facemasks and gubernatorial edits as signs and symbols of their own powerless
assent to a very un-republican subservience.
Politicians across the state and nation would be wise to
step in front of a populist republican reformation before they are carted off
in revolutionary tumbrils.
Pivot now. Later will be too late.
Comments
It will not be forgotten who rules the roost