Skip to main content

Blumenthal, The Consumer Protection Czar

Blumenthal and Harris

One has to search long and hard to find any negative news reports on Senator Dick Blumenthal, even in Connecticut's media morgues. Blumenthal recently has hitched his star to President Joseph Biden's presidential juggernaut as a consumer protection chieftain in the U.S. Senate. The two are old friends, and Blumenthal during the past four years has become unfailingly partisan.

Just as a rising tide lifts all the boats, President John Kennedy’s formulation, so a rising Democrat election tide has lifted Blumenthal’s dingy. “Blumenthal heads Senate consumer protection committee, giving him key perch for business oversightscreams the headline in the Hartford Courant. Blumenthal has been down this yellow brick road before.

One of the reasons for tender treatment by Connecticut’s press is that Blumenthal has been, over the years, adept at massaging his state’s media, which often dumped Blumenthal’s press releases into their various formats without the usual, critical cross-examination. In essence, Blumenthal was allowed to write his own press stories, nearly all of them, unsurprisingly, positive. It was George Bernard Shaw who said that the only accurate biography of Napoleon Bonaparte would be one written by his butler. Everyone else during the great man’s rise to power was busily bowing at the throne, and his butler, of course, would have been familiar with the great man’s foibles. Blumenthal, though a millionaire, has no butler.

If Blumenthal had made any mistakes during his two decade stint as Connecticut’s crusading Attorney General, they were carefully buried and stowed away in caskets in the deep, overgrown forest of media accommodation. And, of course, his small-fry victims, many of them driven out of business by Blumenthal’s often tendentious news releases, hadn’t the resources to defend themselves after they had been stretched out on the usual AG rack.

For these reasons, it was refreshing – not to say shocking -- to read, way back in 2010, an exceptional piece in the Connecticut Post, “Blumenthal The ‘A' in AG is for Activist,” that might have been written by Blumenthal’s unassuming butler, if Blumenthal had a butler who had, perhaps inadvertently, turned the tables on his boss. The Post piece was the single notable exception that proved the rule, the rule being that no one in Connecticut’s left of center politics has enemies to the right.

The Post story, after noting that Blumenthal had changed the mission of Connecticut’s AG office, “moving away from the traditional role of state attorney to one of citizens' advocate,” noted in passing three of Blumenthal’s small-fry victims.

One case involved Gina Malapanis of Computer Plus Center, whom Blumenthal accused of “failing to deliver on a state computer contract… She was arrested by state police and charged with 5th degree larceny months after her computers, company records and office safes were seized. Initially, Blumenthal “sought $1.7 million in reimbursement and penalties from Malapanis,” a charge that later was “dismissed after the state offered Malapanis accelerated rehabilitation, which she accepted.”

Using the state’s media to soften his targets, over-charging and then reducing the over-charge were common proceedings in Blumenthal’s AG torcher chamber. However, “Malapanis countersued the state, claiming Blumenthal's actions, including huge liens placed against her business and property, destroyed her company. Six years after Blumenthal sued Malapanis, a jury awarded her $18 million in damages. That award was reduced to $1.8 million a few months ago, and Blumenthal continues to appeal.”

Chris Healy, chairman of the Republican Party at the time, said of Blumenthal that he had “wielded the blunt instrument of his office against an entrepreneur, destroying her business and even trying to get her thrown in jail, on accusations a jury found so unfounded she deserved compensation 61 times the amount she was accused of stealing. No one should entertain the hope that other businesses, from small, startup electronics outfits to Pratt & Whitney, are unaware that a job-destroying, anti-business atmosphere pervades Connecticut, or that it wears the face of Dick Blumenthal."

The Post, in a contrarian mood, noted, “Blumenthal's office, by its own count, participates in 45,000 to 50,000 legal cases a year before federal and state courts. There are some 32,000 cases now pending. Although most of those cases relate to child protection and support issues, a sizable number involve consumer protection.”

And the cases involving consumer protection were not Big Tobacco cases. Many of them were small bore complaints, molehills that Blumenthal through his contacts in the media had blown up into mountains. Both the Post and Connecticut Commentary mentioned other cases here.

George Jepsen followed Blumenthal into the AG’s office. The new AG dismissed more than 200 cases that Blumenthal had for years left frying on his burners. These were people, many of them small business owners whose assets Blumenthal had commandeered so that, driven to the point of bankruptcy, they could not properly defend themselves against Blumenthal’s charges and were forced to pay fines in “settlements” that might have been arranged before Blumenthal had stretched them out on a media rack that destroyed their reputations and their businesses.

Stretching his limbs as the Democrat’s Inspector Javert, Blumenthal is quoted in a recent news report on his new responsibilities as head the Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Manufacturing, Trade and Consumer Protection.

“The exciting part of this new responsibility is in fact the breadth of subjects that we can go after,” the old fox said Friday in a telephone interview, licking his chops.

Blumenthal brings to his new responsibilities all the instruments of forced persuasion he had deployed so successfully for 20 years as Connecticut’s consumer protection Attorney General. It will be like watching a young boy with two stomachs raiding a candy store and eating up the profits.


Blumenthal dropped the ball big time back in 2001 through 2003 with turning his back on crumbling foundations. It could have been stopped but he especially did nothing. I had to wait over 20 years for help for thousands of people in CT and now we find out it is also in MA. Blumenthal shut and locked the door in our faces creating the biggest disaster CT has ever had!!!

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Putting On Ayers, Radical Chic Lives

Another associate of Barack Obama, former terrorist now Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of Illinois, Chicago, Bill Ayers, is shown in an article on him that appeared in Chicago Magazine with a flag rumpled at his feet, a Mona Lisa smile coursing across his face. Ayers, one supposes, is no fan of flag pins. He’s duded up in jeans and a frumpy navy sport coat, the very picture of soi-disant late 60’s early 70’sb, bomb throwing, cop hating, marriage scorning, pot smoking, authority questioning, radical underground revolutionary whose Daddy was a wealthy capitalist. Sol Stern in City Journal writes that Ayers is highly influential among the nation's educators: "Ayers’s texts on the imperative of social-justice teaching are among the most popular works in the syllabi of the nation’s teacher-ed schools and teacher-training institutes. One of Ayers’s major themes is that the American public school system is nothing but a reflection of capitalist hegemony. Thu

Shays To Republican Nominating Convention – Don’t Bother!

In a meeting with the Editorial Board of the Danbury News Times, Republican Party Senate hopeful Chris Shays told editors on Tuesday “he will take his fight for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate to an August primary,” perhaps not the most useful way to influence Republican Party convention delegates to choose him to represent the party in what promises to be an expensive and contentious battle for a U.S. Senate seat presently held by Joe Lieberman. Mr. Shays had done the math. “Only 25 percent of voters in Connecticut are Republicans,” Mr. Shays says, “and only 20 percent of them vote. So now 5 percent of the electorate are (sic) going to vote in the Republican primary, and of that 5 percent, 2½ percent plus one are going to decide. … We know who those 150,000 voters are who are going to vote and we can target them and make our best case.” The worry among Republicans is that Mr. Shays' promised primary, should nominating conventioneers once again choose party competitor