Skip to main content

Connecticut, Color Us Red

Connecticut's Coronavirus hot zones

We have been living in the dark forest of Coronavirus long enough now – about eight months – so that we should be able at this point to shed a few primitive conceptions and misconceptions concerning the virus.

The novel virus is not the Black Death which, from 1347 to 1351, decimated Eurasia, North Africa and Europe. The Black Death carried off 75–200 million people in Eurasia and North Africa, peaking in Europe; nearly 50 percent of the population of Europe died of – not with -- the plague. Businesses were lost because lives were lost. Consumers died, employees died, businesses died.

This is not the case with Coronavirus. Businesses are disappearing in Connecticut, for instance, not because employees have been carried off by a deadly pandemic. In fact, many of the Coronavirus deaths in Connecticut, New York and New Jersey occurred in nursing homes ill prepared to confront the virus.

The governors of these three states knew from the get-go that elderly people in nursing homes were more likely than, say, school children under 14 years of age to die with not of the virus. Jobs in Connecticut are disappearing because politicians have executed lockdowns, partial lockdowns and recently more robust lockdowns during the course of the viral spread. The deaths in nursing homes are properly attributed to political decisions made and not made by governors.

We have been treated daily to death totals during the course of the infestation. Coronavirus is called a “novel” virus because it is a startling new virus manufactured and exported, it is now generally accepted, from a lab in Wuhan China.

Because the virus is new, any “science” concerning the virus must necessarily be primitive. Instead of a “science” of Coronavirus, we have before us many scientists, a contentious lot, openly disputing the best way to kill Coronavirus. In a few years, scientists will be able to tell us what we’ve done right and wrong in combatting the virus.

As early as May 2020, we knew that the combined deaths in Connecticut nursing homes and assisted living facilities were “ roughly 70 percent of the 3,125 COVID-19-related fatalities reported,” according to a piece in CTPost. These dry bones may properly be laid at the doorsteps of state governors.

The good news is that scientists are daily promoting new treatments, and a vaccine, owing to the efforts of the Trump administration, is beginning to hatch from its egg.

This is good news because we know that the wearing of masks, maintaining a six foot distance from others, and self-sequestration, while helpful in flattening the Coronavirus curve, are not curative. Flattening the Coronavirus curve should not be confused with ending Coronavirus. When you flatten Coronavirus, you extend it into the future; flattening the curve extends, it does not end, Coronavirus.

It is the human body that ends viral infections by producing antibodies that kill pathogens. A vaccine hastens the process.

Recent state elections painted Connecticut blue from head to toe, but the state just now is a Coronavirus red. “Eighty percent of Connecticut residents,” CTMirror tells us, “now live in COVID hot zones, places where the per-capita caseload exceeds 15 per 100,000 people.” The Hartford Courant tells us that “Gov. Ned Lamont and several top state officials began self-quarantining Friday night after his chief spokesperson, Max Reiss, tested positive for COVID-19.”

The reports do not tell us whether a citizen of Connecticut traveling between the state’s hotzones and its increasingly disappearing cool zones must self-quarantine for fourteen days before he or she is able to resume his or her sub-normal Coronavirus routine. Now that Democrats control with vast majorities both chambers of the General Assembly, all the Constitutional offices in Connecticut, all the seats in Connecticut’s US Congressional Delegation, the Governor’s office and the State Supreme Court, whose justices have been appointed by Democrat left of center governors, a recalibration of Coronavirus may be possible.

The red-spread has “subdued” Lamont, whose approval rating zoomed from 24.1 a little more than a year ago to a present high of 53.21. “He more than doubled his approval rating in 13 months,” Colin McEnroe wrote in the Hearst papers. “You don’t see that a lot. The fishhook that pulled him up from underwater was COVID-19. The same poll said 71.2 percent of residents like the way he has communicated during the pandemic … When you look at Lamont now, after guiding our state roughly half of the way through a treacherous pandemic crisis, he looks ... I don’t know how to say this ... he looks ... I don’t know if I can say this ... he looks ... kind of hot.”

Joining Lamont at a dour news conference, former head of the Food and Drug Administration  Scott Gottlieb, Lamont’s Dr. Fauci, said “I think this is the final stage of the acute phase of this pandemic that we need to get through. Unfortunately, it’s going to be the hardest phase right now. We’re in for a very difficult two to three months.”

But in the end, all things end, even pandemics. “Gottlieb said,” according to CTMirror, “the disease might finally be tamed in 2021. At the current rate of spread, at least 30% of the U.S. will have had the disease, slowing transmission. And mass vaccinations might be available next summer.”

The disease is being slowed by non-quarantined people “who have had the disease,” not politicians who have flattened the curve. And, thanks to soon to be ex-President Trump, vaccines might be made available early during the presumed presidency of Joe Biden.

Comments

Unknown said…
Well said Don !! Citizens will never see these kind of factual comments by Connecticut's far left of center so called media.
Don Pesci said…
I fear you're right.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p