Skip to main content

Autocracy In Connecticut, The New Normal

Lamont

Coronavirus, we have been told countless times, has knocked “government as we know it” into a cocked hat. Purely as a practical matter, we in Connecticut have no fully operative legislature or judiciary.

This means that our usual three legged governmental stool – legislative, judicial and executive branches of government – is lacking two legs. Only the executive department, in the person of Governor Ned Lamont, is operating on all cylinders and at, some would say, excessive speed.

A statute that gives the governor near plenipotentiary powers during emergencies, repurposed when Coronavirus slammed into Connecticut via communist China and Mayor Bill de Blasio’s New York City, has been operative in Connecticut for six months. A dominant Democrat legislature has recently extended the governor’s extraordinary powers yet another five months.

This extension of powers, this sundering of the separation of powers, some believe, may be unconstitutional and, at the very least, raises an intensely practical question: At what point do the governor’s extraordinary powers become ordinary powers? If the emergency powers may be indefinitely extended by ten General Assembly members – and only a functioning General Assembly may erect borders around the extraordinary powers – have we not then abandoned republican government in exchange for the security of autocracy?

The ten representatives, a kind of a rump legislature, need not even vote on the extension of powers. If they bide their time for 72 hours from the moment Lamont has announced he wishes to clothe himself in the purple robes of autocracy, the measure may be approved without a vote. The rump legislature – it is unclear exactly who or what they are representing, other than the wishes of Lamont –need not formally attach their names to their perfidies.

The exchange of security for liberty, the founders well understood, was both a Faustian bargain and a breech of republican governance; for security imposed on the people by a small band of legislators seeking to escape the wrath of their constituents is the very definition of tyranny. Security of this kind stinks of the prison the founders hoped to escape by pledging their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to a newly established constitutional republic.

At a recent meeting of the rump legislature, Republicans attempted to block a five month extension of Lamont’s “extraordinary” powers. Their effort to shore up republican governance, provoked a stern rebuff from union employed Speaker of the House Joe Arsimowicz. Which of the governor’s decisions, Arsimowicz asked “are we so upset about?”

The correct answer is – any decision affecting the whole population that has not been affirmed by the full body over which Arsimowicz presides. Coronavirus related directives from the governor that have not been sanctioned by a formal vote in the General Assembly, the people’s legislative court, should concern all legislators, as well as the constituents they are, on this occasion, pretending to represent.

If Arsimowicz so cavalierly wants to surrender his legislative prerogatives to the equivalent of King George, he should surrender his seat as well and find other employment, perhaps as an AFSCME Council 4 Educational Coordinator teaching classes on union organizing and bargaining.

The political and social critic Dwight McDonald used to ask his countrymen ever so often—how would anyone know if the country was sliding into a new Dark Age?

Similarly, Connecticut voters might wish to ponder --  how would they know if their government was entering, through a radical historical reversion, what we might call a very old, pre-constitutional, pre-republican, autocracy?

Even some cautious media adepts are beginning to notice a seismic shift in the political template.

Lamont presently has more political power at his disposal than did, say, King George of Britain before the founders of our republic declared independence from the British monarchy. And even the king, no stranger to British history, drew the right lessons from the Long Parliament of 1640, when legislators in Britain asserted their legislative prerogatives and beheaded their presumptuous monarch, who thought he was above both the law and the executioner’s axe.

Lamont has no effective loyal opposition in the General Assembly to contend with, and Connecticut’s Supreme Court, presumptive guardians of constitutions and limited government, moves exceedingly slowly, if at all – many times in concert with the party of the governor who had elevated the separate members of the court to office. That would be the Democrats, who now have a lock on 1) the governor’s office, 2) the General Assembly, 3) all the state’s constitutional offices, and 4) the entire US Congressional Delegation.

The solution to what McDonald might call a slide into a pre-American Revolution slough of despond is simplicity itself: No decision made by the governor under his emergency powers should be binding without a formal vote in the legislature, 2) the emergency powers of the governor should not last longer than a month in the absence of a formal vote in the legislature extending the powers month by month, and 3) in present circumstances, virtual voting by the members of the General Assembly should be allowed from under the beds where they are hiding to escape the ravages of a waning pandemic.

Just do it.


Comments

Very well said.

Unfortunately, the virtuous people required for self-government
by virtue, as it were, of ignorance of and indifference to our republican heritage long since become incapable of controlling the state "constitutional" government. Liberty as been sacrificed for security and satisfaction of special interest appetites, particularly those of public sector unions.
Anonymous said…
Thanks so much for this refreshing opinion piece. All of this C19 regulation is nonsense, the result of Lamont walking lockstep with a morally bankrupt political party that is attempting to hijack the Republic. Clearly, CT citizens, like those in every other state mismanaged by Democrats, need to wake up to self-governance once more, and add civil duty to their list of personal responsibilities -- learn who governs your town, county and state; watch their activities and assess their decisions on a regular (weekly) basis; get involved on any level -- and always make your voice heard. I'm happy to have found your blog.
Don Pesci said…
Anon, Good to have you aboard.
Anonymous said…
Extraordinary Powers are legitimized only by extreme and dire emergency. In this case, the emergency was not simply a novel disease; it was, instead, the threat that the disease would wo overwhelm our hospitals to the point that our entire health care system would collapse. That emergency has passed. Our hospital occupancy from COVID-19 is less than one-quarter of what it was during the uncontrolled stages of the pandemic.

Once the emergency passes, the justification, and therefor the legal underpinning, of the Extraordinary Powers ceases to exist. Although the Powers, when first declared and then extended by the Governor, carried an expiration date, the true expiration occurred long ago, when the emergency passed. The Governor, the legislature, the self-proclaimed health care meritocracy, the Press and by extension the People, have lost sight of the reason and purpose behind the declaration of Emergency. The purpose was not, is not, and cannot reasonably be the total eradication of the disease, no matter how laudable that unrealistic goal may be. The purpose was to get us through the crisis of a threatened hospital system collapse. Mission accomplished. Crisis over. Under our constitutional system of government, Emergency Powers over, even if the time limit has not yet run out.

It is no excuse to say that the Governor's Emergency Powers are legitimate because the legislature has approved the continuation of those powers. The Powers themselves are extraordinary. They allow the Governor to violate laws and even our Constitution in ways that not even all three branches of government working in unison could legitimately violate. If the Governor is doing things which the legislature would like to do, but which would be denied to anyone but the Governor exercising Extraordinary Powers, then why would the legislature be in any hurry to remove or deny those Powers?

Our system of government is not a dictatorship, not even one sanctioned by the legislature or the courts. All power derives from the people in the form of the Constitution. The Constitution does not grant us rights; it gives and delineates limited powers to the Governor, to the legislature, and to the courts, in conformance with the limitations contained within the Constitution itself. With or without legislative approval, the Governor has no authority other than that which is bestowed upon him by the People.

It time for the Governor to relinquish his Emergency Powers. It is time for the legislature to fulfill its role as an equal branch of government. It is time for the People of Connecticut, from whom all legitimate governing powers derive, to demand the restoration of the constitutional authority of our government. It is time for the Press to fulfill its obligation to speak truth to power, and demand that the Governor and the legislators and the courts relinquish the Extraordinary Powers which the Governor claimed to himself.

It does not matter whether the Governor has done a good job or a bad job with his Powers. Even benevolent dictators are not benevolent to everyone and forever.

What matters now is the legitimacy of Power, and the Governor has reached far beyond the time and justification of that legitimacy.
Kevin McCann said…
I did not post my name with the prior comment, but for your information my name is Kevin McCann, and I live in South Windsor.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p