Skip to main content

The Real Slave Traders In An Age of Hypocritical Self-Praise


Mark Twain once said about the weather in New England, rudely changeable, “Everyone talks about the weather, but no one seems willing to do anything about it.” The same may be said of the effort on the part of social and political anarchists to destroy all the emblems of the past in order to build a brave new world. No one appears willing to put a stop to their anarchic vandalization of history. 

None of the iconoclastic protesters who have defaced statues in Connecticut have yet taken aim at Elihu Yale, whose statue in Yale University remains strangely unmolested.

The prestigious college, known the world over, is in New Haven, whose Democrat Mayor, Justin Elicker, recently winked at those, himself included, who wish to air-brush Christopher Columbus from the historical memory of the nation for the crime of… what? The African slave trade in America began about two hundred years after the first slaves were shipped to the New World. Columbus personally had no hand at all in the African slave trade.

Elicker disdainfully winked at the removal of a statue of Columbus in New Haven in the same manner that a dentist would regard the removal of a rotten tooth. “The Christopher Columbus statue for many Italians is a celebration of Italian heritage,” Elicker said. “But the statue of Christopher Columbus also represents a time of colonialism and atrocities committed. It is the right decision to remove the statue. After the statue is removed, I believe it is important that we, as a community, have a conversation about how to best honor the heritage of so many Italians who have made New Haven their home.” It may be noted that Elicker studiously avoided attributing to Columbus directly those defects in character he reprobated. Columbus was not himself a colonialist, or a conquistador, or a seller and trader of African slaves.

No one more officiously represented a time of colonialism than Elihu Yale, who really did, unlike Columbus, facilitate the monetizing of slavery. Yale money -- some of which was given to Yale University, an act of generosity repaid when the university was named after him -- is associated with the slave trade. And, a charge made of Columbus by those who wished to displace him as an administrator of the island of Hispaniola, Yale was corrupt as well.

Yale was the President of Fort St. George in India and, as such, purchased territory for private purposes with East India funds. Yale, according to a reliable historical account, “imposed high taxes for the maintenance of the colonial garrison and town, resulting in an unpopular regime and several revolts by Indians, brutally quelled by garrison soldiers.” He was, it has been said, “notorious for arresting and trying Indians on his own private authority, including the hanging of a stable boy who had absconded with a Company horse.” In our day, he would have been considered a textbook example of a privileged, white colonialist, a go-getting, energetic businessman in an age that dealt in the buying and selling of human flesh that, in our more enlightened day, has been roundly condemned by both mayors of major cities in Connecticut and Yale professors, all symbolically marching in protests arranged by Black Lives Matter (BLM).

According to some sources, Yale permitted a law specifying that at least ten slaves should be carried in every ship bound for Europe, and as a judge he sentenced on several occasions so called "black criminals" to whipping and enslavement.

Yale months ago disassociated itself from the foul name of states-righter John Calhoun. But it remains eponymously attached to a white, privileged colonialist and appears to be blithely undisturbed by any of this. BLM is strangely unmoved. There, in a quiet Yale courtyard, a statue of Yale sits undaubed with red paint, as ANTIFA races forward towards its brave new utopia, breaking storefront windows, setting fire to historic Washington DC black churches, pulling down the statues of those, like Ulysses Grant, who, in a blood drenched Civil War, struck the chains from slaves feet, while common Civil War soldiers such as Oliver Dart of Vernon, Connecticut wore the marks of liberation on his face all his life long, a sacrifice remaining unremarked by Yale professors and students.

The forces, like Black Lives Matter and its militant enforcement arm, ANTIFA, who wish to repeal history are missing a most enriching cue. Yale, with its obscenely swollen endowment, is many times richer than the slaver after whom it is named. With even mild ANTIFA pressure, the New Haven university and enlightened politicians blinded by the light such as Elicher and the all-Democrat members of Connecticut’s US Congressional Delegation, may be able to induce Yale to cough up for the cause a portion of its great wealth. Statues are poor, defenseless and mute. But Yale!

Much more so than is the case with Columbus, the historical record of Elihu Yale’s perfidies screams for reparations. Historical justice and social justice both demand it. What’s the hold up on the hold up?

Yale died in 1721, a white, privileged, colonialist slaver to the end.   His tomb in London is engraved with the following legend:

Born in America, in Europe bred
In Africa travell'd and in Asia wed
Where long he liv'd and thriv'd; In London dead
Much good, some ill, he did; so hope all's even
And that his soul thro' mercy's gone to Heaven
You that survive and read this tale, take care
For this most certain exit to prepare
Where blest in peace, the actions of the just
Smell sweet and blossom in the silent dust.

It’s good to know that the angels have forgiven the slave trader. In both Heaven and Yale, the trade remains today its guiltiest secret.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p