Skip to main content

Progressive Prohibitionists And The Politics Of Vengeance


Government begins to be a bother when it uses the power of the state to prohibit normative behavior. The primary instrument of compulsion in this case is – and should never be – the tax code. Ordinary people who would not know a political ideology from a lamppost may be forgiven for reacting normally to a government that uses the tax code to shape behavior.

And yet this practice has become as common as table salt, which some people believe should be taxed exorbitantly because it isn’t good for you.

Among other items and practices not good for you are tobacco products. These have been on the hit list of world reformers since Dick Blumenthal sued Big Tobacco, taxes were piled on, and soon – but not soon enough for Connecticut’s consumer protection Attorney General -- the product became unaffordable and undesirable. A good thing too, many people thought, because the tobacco had been linked to cancer, and it contained additive properties. Current Attorney Generalisimo William Tong has joined other attorneys general in progressive states in an attempt to drive President Donald Trump from office, although Trump has not been known to cause cancer.

Tong, along with the entire Democrat Party, wants to examine Trump’s tax records, hoping to find in that mare’s nest an item they may use to shoehorn him out of office; after a two year attempt to find Trump had traitorously conspired with Russian President Vladimir Putin to deny the presidency to Hillary Clinton, that bumper car ran out of electricity. There is not a single person in Connecticut – including camera-shy Blumenthal -- who would be able to find in the statutes creating the office of Attorney General a warrant to sue presidents. But never mind; vengeance politics has always colored outside the lines.

A discovery made by Connecticut's Government Administration and Elections Committee, the odious GAEC, may moot the whole effort anyway. If successful, their effort would prevent voters in Connecticut from casting their ballots for Trump in 2020.

“In meetings Friday and Monday,” CTMirror reports, “the Government Administration and Elections Committee approved dozens of bills, including a measure drafted in response to President Trump’s refusal to release his tax returns in 2016. The bill would require presidential and gubernatorial candidates to release their returns for three years to get on the ballot in Connecticut.” The US Constitution proposes only three limitations on the office of president: the president must be a natural born citizen, over 35 years of age, and the office is limited to two terms. CTMirror did not ask the members of GAEC when they had planned to propose another amendment to limit the office to their liking.

Under the new Democrat Party dispensation, if you like your car, you can’t have it. If you like your house, you can’t have it. If you like your town to regulate and finance local schools, you can’t have it under a consolidation plan that deconstructs and reconstructs school boundaries. If you like our president, you can’t have him.

Cars are a menace, Green New Deal proponents assure us, because fossil fuels will render the planet uninhabitable in 20 years or more. The members of Connecticut’s all Democrat U.S. Congressional Delegation, among other leftists, would much prefer it if people took trains and buses. The price of gas in Connecticut is encumbered with numerous taxes: a federal tax of more than 18 cents a gallon, and a state tax of 43 cents a gallon, as of January the 8th highest gas tax in the nation. As a general rule, taxes attached to products and services boost costs and reduce consumption. The miles traveled per driver in Connecticut annually are 12,117, the 7th lowest in the nation.

Whatever you tax or regulate tends to disappear. According to Turbo Tax, Connecticut’s tax burden – “what taxpayers actually spend in local and state taxes” – falls just behind New York at 12.6%; Americans paid an average rate of 9.9 percent in state and local taxes in 2012. Unsurprisingly, taxpayers are beginning to disappear. “Connecticut Ranks 3rd in Country for People Moving Out,” according to the Yankee Institute, which has drawn its figures from a 2019 National Movers Study by United Van Lines.

The figures suggest that Big Tax Democrats have rendered life in Connecticut, for many in “the land of steady habits,” uninhabitable.



Comments

MrsL9512 said…
Thanks, Don. Another great post. Whenever possible, I urge people to move out of CT if they can. Republicans and conservatives are so outnumbered in this state and,in my view, voters are very uneducated about policy. The last election proved it. CT is a very beautiful state with a rich history. It is so very sad we have ugly government and so little chance of winning the governorship.

God bless us everyone.
Vmoving said…
Moving can be very tedious, especially if you own a lot of stuff. Packing up all of your things, renting a truck, loading the truck, driving to the new place, and unloading everything... This is all very time-consuming. As a result, many people choose to hire a moving company to do all or part of it.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p