Skip to main content

Why Connecticut’s Left Of Center Media Will Endorse Ned Lamont


After the August primaries, most major papers in Connecticut will endorse Ned Lamont as the state’s next governor. Like politicians, newspaper owners and Editorial Page Editors are victims of their past choices. If you’ve said “yes” at the altar in the presence of so many church witnesses, it becomes a chancy proposition to call it quits too soon after the honeymoon.

Lamont was the preferred candidate of former Senator and Governor Lowell Weicker. Left of center writers in Connecticut became Weicker-likers for any number of reasons. He was a manageable Republican senator. Indeed, there are some people who think, considering his record in office, that Weicker was a closet Democrat. Weicker’s left of center Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) rating during his last term in office was 90; Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Dodd’s was 85. Weicker could be depended upon to frustrate wide-awake conservatives. Generally, the left of center media in Connecticut, then and now, will gleefully strangle conservatives in their political cribs.


Much of Connecticut’s media supported Weicker during his 18 years as the state’s senior “Republican” U.S. Senator. Before becoming Senator, Weicker toiled for one term in the U.S. House vineyards. He was the large and imposing Republican politician in whose shade no other Republican afflicted with conservative tendencies could grow and prosper.

Connecticut’s left of center media supported Senator Weicker, and every announcement of support was a Maginot line from which they could not in the future retreat. Albert Camus, the French writer and philosopher, used to say that every word written by a writer was a commitment.

Weicker’s political career peaked before he became governor. But when Weicker imposed on a reluctant General Assembly an income tax that he broadly hinted during his campaign for governor he would under no circumstance impose – adding an income tax during a recession, Weicker said, would be “like pouring gas on a fire” – Weicker was elevated by Connecticut’s media to something resembling political sainthood. At last, Democrat moderates such as former Governor Ella Grasso had been routed, and the door had been opened to uber-liberals, progressives who later would triple the budget, increase spending threefold and bring Connecticut’s concern with improvident spending to a grinding halt.

Every step of the way, Weicker was cheered on by a solicitous media. These are precisely the kinds of commitment traps that Camus was talking about.

The low point in Weicker’s senatorial career was his defeat by then Connecticut Attorney General Joe Lieberman, which signaled the real and permanent break between Weicker and those in his party who had permitted themselves to be fooled most of the time. So, you want to be a Democrat, do you? Good, do it in someone else’s political theatre. We, Republicans as much as said, are tired of the show. Life in the Republican Party will go on without you.

Weicker almost recovered handsomely from his shattering defeat in the Senate by a real Democrat when Lieberman was defeated in a Democrat primary by Ned Lamont, a cipher Weicker had hit upon to carry karma home to Lieberman. Alas, while Lamont won the primary, he lost the general election to the guy who had undone Weicker’s career in the Congress.

But the committed are committed still to the absurd and ruinous proposition that Connecticut is suffering from a revenue rather than a spending problem. The income tax, and other tax increases in Connecticut – most dramatically outgoing Governor Dannel Malloy’s two massive tax increases, the largest and the second largest in state history – have saved cowardly legislators the necessity of instituting long term, permanent cuts in spending. That was the unstated purpose of the Weicker income tax and Malloy’s crippling tax increases. Now that spending has tripled since the Weicker tax, now that Malloy’s two tax increases have produced more of the same – swelling pension obligations and continuing deficits – progressive Democrats in the General Assembly, who have sold the state’s birthright for a mess of state employee union pottage, are on the hunt for additional taxes to be generated by toll stations. Truly, these progressives have forgotten everything and leaned nothing.

The great tragedy in Connecticut politics is how little the real stress points in the state will affect the usual endorsements of papers that in the past have, perhaps thoughtlessly, committed themselves to ruinous policies and more-of-the-same politicians. One may depend upon it: a Governor Ned Lamont will continue in the old tax and spend ways under the withering shadows of Weicker and Malloy. Yet, even so, he will garner the endorsements of much of Connecticut media, which sadly have become the prisoners of their own prior commitments.


________________________


ADDENDA Hartford Courant editorial , August 5, 2018  -- "Unlike the stereotypical businessman, Mr. Lamont is progressive."


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e