Skip to main content

Colin Gets Religion


In his latest column, “Maybe A Little Bible Study With John Rowland,”  Hartford Courant columnists Colin McEnroe confesses, “As some of you know, I began going to church in April 2015.”

Groucho Marx used to joke that he would decline to join any group that would have him as a member. Mr. McEnroe is not so illiberal, but he makes plain that there are conditions: “We are not Jerry Falwell Baptists. We are LGBTQ-friendly. In fact, we have more LGBTQ pastors than we have the other kind. Baptists get kind of a bad name sometimes. Elijah Craig was a Baptist minister, and some people say he invented bourbon. That's the kind of Baptist we can be proud of.”


Mr. McEnroe’s church experience has made him reconsider his old enmity involving former Governor John Rowland: “Since about 1994, John Rowland has bothered me. I could tell, even then, he was a rotten person. I turned out to be right. Twice. Lately, though, I've been hoping he doesn't have to go back to prison. You would have to have lived through my 22-year Ahab-and-whale relationship with Rowland to understand how weird that is.”

The assault on Rowland was pressed earliest by Mr. McEnroe’s friend Bill Curry when Mr. Curry was running for Governor against Mr. McEnroe’s bete noir. When the prison doors finally clinked shut on Mr. Rowland, who had been convicted of the theft of honest services, Mr. Curry wrote a piece that said in so many words,  “There, you see. I told you so. But no one ever listens to Cassandra.”

Mr. Rowland, now having been convicted of accepting money from the husband of a politician running for office when he was talk-show hosting and concealing the payments from the ubiquitous taxman, is appealing his conviction. When he runs out of money, his appeals and his lawyers will wither away.

There may be reasons to take Mr. Rowland’s appeal seriously, but those reasons cannot be found in Holy Scripture. There are some court watchers who think the prosecutors got the wrong man. The only co-conspirator in this crime who escaped the long arm of the law was the millionaire who supplied to Mr. Rowland a disputed pay-off. The prosecution narrative forces us to accept the implausible notion that, far from money talking, it was the recipient of a concealed illegal arrangement rather than the money-man and his lawyers who had arranged the improper deal; nor has it escaped notice that Mr. Rowland was a talk-show host, NOT a politician, at the time he had fallen into sin. While talk show hosts, a species of journalists, are not immune to prosecution, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution hangs over the Rowland trial like a questioning Devil's Advocate.

Mr. Rowland probably will end up in prison a second time -- because there are too few prosecutors or columnists who take seriously the Biblical injunction “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Rigorously observed, that injunction would empty our prisons and save permanently in-debt Connecticut lots of money that otherwise might be spent wiping every tear and smoothing every brow.

Mr. McEnroe’s Baptist Church experiences have taught him how to think dangerously – that is to say, religiously – about what we generally consider non-religious issues: Would it be worthwhile for Mr. McEnroe to sup with Mr. Rowland, his former political nemesis?

Well yes. Mr. McEnroe answers: “My favorite part of Mark is 2:13-17, where Jesus goes to this nice-sounding dinner and insists on eating with the tax collectors (whom everybody really, really hates) and the sinners. Because what would be the point of eating with the people who aren't totally crappy?”

The Jews of Jesus’s time hated tax collectors – Matthew, the evangelist, may have been one of them – because the taxes collected were used to finance their own oppression at the hands of Roman overlords who later destroyed their temple and crucified Jesus, which was not very Christian of them. This hands-off religion prohibition has slyly entered American jurisprudence through a Constitutional back door which prohibits the governing authority to promulgate or enforce laws affecting religious expression (see the relevant clause in  the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution).

American Baptists, like Catholics, understand well the uses of government oppression to deny religious expression in a public square constitutionally open to all. When – if ever – Mr. McEnroe does have lunch with the sinner Rowland, the three gathered together (see Matthew 18:20 “For where two or three are gathered in my namethere am I among them”) should bat around the question: Why should the public square be closed to promptings of the Christian spirit?


Baptists and other Christians in Connecticut all would like to see a transcript of that discussion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...