William Butler Yeats |
Things fall apart;
the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed
tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity – William Butler Yeats
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity – William Butler Yeats
The split in the national Republican Party on the right has
been visible for months, while the split among Democrats on the left has not
been as publicly evident. But it is there, rankling just beneath the surface
of the Democratic Party, and every so often the horned beast shows itself.
At present, two Democrats, one a socialist and the other a
progressive, are jousting with each other for “the soul of the Democratic
Party.” Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic Presidential nominee, and Bernie Sanders, America’s version of a European Democratic
Socialist, have appeared in a few venues, infrequently striking each other with
palm fronds. What is most notable in these too friendly confrontations is the unanimity
on important issues. Sliding leftward, perhaps to appease Sanders’ supporters,
Mrs. Clinton has pulled out all the stops on gun regulations -- she’s for it,
lock stock and barrel -- and she is vigorously supporting a measure that will
force orthodox Christians to pay for all forms of abortion, even the kind of
later term abortion that Daniel Patrick Moynihan condemned as “too close to
infanticide” to support. In Connecticut’s media during days when moderates had
standing within the Democratic Party, such positions as Mrs. Clinton now fulsomely
embraces would have been considered extreme.
The Democratic Party has been captured by the far left, which brings to
the foreground a question little asked these days: Where have all the
Democratic moderates gone… long time passing?
Come to think of it, the same questions may be asked of the
Democratic Party here in Connecticut’s one-party state: Where are the Ella
Grasso/ Bill O’Neill Democrats?
The political template has changed. What used to be called
in the state Democratic Party “the vital center” has moved far to the left.
Democratic Governors O’Neill and Grasso would have gagged on a spoon before bringing
themselves to announce their support of a card carrying socialist candidate for
President and, traditional moral rectitude not yet having moved off center in
the land of steady habits, both might have had a problem with Hillary Clinton’s
husband and his sloppy sexual habits. Within the state Democratic Party, the
vital center – meaning moderate Democrats concerned about improvident spending
and a business-throttling tax and
regulatory apparatus – is little more than a heap of smoldering ruins.
General Electric has left the state; large companies native
to the state have merged with out-of-state companies that have little emotional
attachment to Connecticut and, as out-migration continues, the remaining middle
class will be forced to shoulder a tax burden once carried by broad-shouldered Connecticut
businesses that now have their eyes fixed on the exit signs.
Left out in the cold are former Democratic moderates or, the
preferred term among conservatives, Reagan Democrats. Nationally, Donald Trump –
not a conservative and possibly not a Republican -- is pitching his message to “the silent majority,” a catch basin term used by former President Richard “Tricky Dick” Nixon to
gather in disenfranchised Democrats who were unwilling to allow a vocal
minority in their party to abandon the long twilight struggle against
totalitarianism.
Unlike the moderate Democratic Party of yesteryear, Connecticut’s
current party is hegemonic. Constructing perpetually out-of-balance budgets,
Mr. Malloy, the rescission governor, numerous times has banned bipartisan input
from Republicans. During a recent budget session, Mr. Malloy invited
Republican leaders to help balance one of his chronically unbalanced budgets,
but this was merely for show, said Republican House leader Themis Klarites:
“The Senate President and the Speaker of the House are just as bad as the Governor in regards to these fiscal policies in the state. They brought
[Republican legislators] into the room to debate and negotiate, not because
they really thought we should be in there but because they wanted our
fingerprints on the murder weapon. I know that seems very extreme but it’s the
truth. I look at this as a crime perpetrated on the state of Connecticut.”
Mr. Malloy pressed through the dominant Democratic General
Assembly a bill that abolished the death penalty in Connecticut – this a few months
after a mass murder in Cheshire and a few weeks before another mass murder in
Sandy Hook. Despite unpopular measures restricting the purchase of guns by law
abiding citizens that were copied and promoted without much success by Mr.
Obama, Hartford, where all the politicians gather to boost taxes and write
costly regulations, was named several
weeks ago as the murder Capital of New England.
When General Electric (GE) left the state for Massachusetts,
citing high taxes and crippling regulations as reasons for the move, Mr. Malloy
sighed, “You win some, you lose some.” And his subalterns in the General
Assembly still insist that Connecticut’s ever mounting tax arc and a new
“unitary” tax aimed at large tax scofflaws such as GE had nothing to do with
the move to Massachusetts. GE moved, it is said, because Massachusetts’ crony
capitalist governor was more aggressive that Connecticut’s crony capitalist
governor.
The eccentric center of Connecticut’s Democratic hegemon cannot
hold.
Comments