Skip to main content

Work, Work, Work -- Spend, Spend, Spend


Election nonsense behind him, Governor Dannel Malloy, the workaholic, is fully prepared to lead Connecticut’s ship of state over the shoals that lie ahead in his second term. He is quoted in one publication to this effect: “No one’s ever outworked me. So I can do more things and still get the job done because I love to work, always have.”

Mr. Malloy has a genius for saying things that are quoted but not quotable. That is because, unlike Abraham Lincoln, he tends to speak off the cuff. Mr. Malloy suffers from dyslexia, a developmental reading disability that occurs when the brain does not properly recognize and process certain symbols. He has valiantly overcome his disability.

Because Mr. Malloy has difficulty reading, one may not expect a Gettysburg Address from him anytime soon. Mr. Lincoln wrote and delivered the Gettysburg Address: Ditto with his second inaugural address, which some presidential scholars consider his finest prose poem.

Mr. Malloy’s dyslexia is not a bar to wit. Perhaps Mr. Malloy loves to work so much that he has no time for pretty or sensible formulations.

So, forget the packaging; let us examine the meat of this sentence: “No one’s ever outworked me. So I can do more things and still get the job done because I love to work, always have.”

It just is not true. There are possibly hundreds of people, some of them politicians, who have outworked Mr. Malloy, among them: Caligula (The Roman Republic was not disassembled in a day, and destroying it was exhausting work); Stalin (The construction of the  Gulag Archipelago took time and effort); Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic of China  (who was responsible, though not single-handedly, of course, for the deaths of some  45 million of his countrymen); and, perhaps more pertinent to Americans, Thomas Edison, inventor of the light bulb, who formed the Edison Portland Cement Co. in 1899, which held patents on, among other things, cement cabinets and pianos. Even genius sleeps from time to time, and personal energy is not always properly or profitably directed.

Which is the point – isn’t it? Time invested in destructive projects is time misspent. Who cares if Mr. Edison spent two or a hundred hours inventing a cement piano? Better to pour your energy into the invention of the light bulb, right?

Now then, Mr. Malloy has spent an inordinate amount of time during his first term removing dollars from the private marketplace in the form of increased taxes, collecting them, and then reallocating his swag as “investments” in projects he deems worthy. This is what Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” – billions of appropriations and allocations made by people who go about their daily business getting and spending – does much better than governors and presidents who think their own spending choices are more productive than, say, those of the assistant to the assistant of communications who works in Mr. Malloy’s office whenever he reallocates a dollar from his salary to purchase a package of Pistachio Biscotti from his local Whole Foods Market. No purchase is without its consequences. A dollar spent on biscotti is a dollar NOT wasted on a cement piano.

During his second term in office, the tax starved Malloy administration will have cement on its mind. Big allocations lay ahead. It seems that the state’s infrastructure has been allowed to go to rack and ruin, no doubt the fault, in Mr. Malloy's reckoning, of the governor’s two Republican predecessors, one a criminal twice over and the other, a much less flashy administrator than the present Big Thinker, a nice lady who was not quite as energetic a workaholic as Mr. Malloy.

Just when everyone, consulting their own wallets and budgets while eyeing the exit signs, thought the Malloy administration had reached a ceiling on spending, here comes a cry for MORE. Of course, dilapidated bridges must be fixed; so much is certain. And money must be raised and allocated in Connecticut’s perpetually red budget to do the job – which is necessary. However, Mr. Malloy promised on a stack of bibles during his successful re-election campaign that he would not raise taxes. He certainly has proposed no grand scheme to reduce spending.

So – what’s up with that? Well, you know; It depends upon what a tax is, and whether a fee is a tax, and what spending is, and what “is” is. Is a toll a tax? These are complex metaphysical-philosophical-political terms a proper understanding of which some high octane politicians believe are beyond the pay grade of most voters and taxpayers. And when Mr. Malloy and the Democratic dominated General Assembly proposes to finance “necessary” capital expenditures, very likely by means of borrowing, whether the money generated for the purpose will be spent solely on capital expenditures – rather than being dumped in the General Fund to patch future budget holes – will depend upon the proper complex metaphysical-philosophical-political meanings attached to Mr. Malloy’s upcoming second inaugural address before the General Assembly, which likely will call for more spending and the dismemberment of municipal governments, the last effective bars to controlled spending in Connecticut.

Here’s a bit of advice for the state’s reporters and commentators: Put on your jeweler's loupe. So much to do, so little time -- better get busy.


Comments

peter brush said…
“No one’s ever outworked me. So I can do more things and still get the job done because I love to work, always have.”
------------
Right; the act of working is what impresses, not necessarily the resulting accomplishment. For the managerial class in charge of operating our bureaucratic general welfare leviathan the business of government is busyness. The Protestant work ethic transferred to the secular sphere. Not critical that veterans actually get medical treatment, only that they receive a swirl of concerned-appearing activity.
----------
Since it was impossible to know who was predestined, the notion developed that it might be possible to discern that a person was elect (predestined) by observing their way of life. Hard work and frugality, as well as social success and wealth, were thought to be two important consequences of being one of the elect; Protestants were thus attracted to these qualities and supposed to strive for reaching them.
peter brush said…
It used be generally accepted that markets are the most efficient solution to the general economic problem; distribution of scarce resources. It was also generally imagined that extra-market planning and control of economies in places like Sweden and Yugoslavia could supplement markets in the direction of social justice. The invisible hand should be allowed to work, but well-intentioned bureaucrats could step in to modify where markets "failed."

Twenty-five years after the Berlin Wall fell, and our management class seems to have learned the wrong lessons. It will not accept that markets work best, nor will they accept the inherent limitations involved in and distortions caused by government intervention. In the case of Mal-loy and his Party, both nationally and state-wise, there is a blind ideological commitment to government action per se. What is the rational argument that justifies the governmental prohibition of the Keystone pipeline? There is none, zero, nada. There may be a slightly more rational justification for Dannel's Bus, but I haven't seen it. A more critical Connecticut example has to do with one of our Bureaus of Social Justice, the Office of Health Care Access (OHCA), stepping in to prevent a commercial transaction; the purchase of five hospitals by Tenet Healthcare Corp.

I'm with the guys at "Hartford Business Journal;" make the Governor and his Party explain themselves.
------------------
With the recent decision by Tenet Healthcare Corp. to pull out of its acquisitions of five Connecticut hospitals, it's time for the Office of Health Care Access (OHCA) or Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to explain why the 47 restrictions placed on the Waterbury Hospital deal were necessary.
Those conditions, which required the appointment of an independent monitor, the freezing of pricing and staffing levels for five or more years, and the filing of strategic spending and hiring plans, mirrored some of the language initially included in bills proposed last legislative session to govern nonprofit to for-profit hospital conversions.

http://www.hartfordbusiness.com/article/20150105/PRINTEDITION/301029967

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p