Election nonsense behind him, Governor Dannel Malloy, the
workaholic, is fully prepared to lead Connecticut’s ship of state over the
shoals that lie ahead in his second term. He is quoted in one publication to this effect:
“No one’s ever outworked me. So I can do more things and still get the job done
because I love to work, always have.”
Mr. Malloy has a genius for saying things that are quoted
but not quotable. That is because, unlike Abraham Lincoln, he tends to speak
off the cuff. Mr. Malloy suffers from dyslexia, a developmental reading
disability that occurs when the brain does not properly recognize and process
certain symbols. He has valiantly overcome his disability.
Because Mr. Malloy has difficulty reading, one may not
expect a Gettysburg Address from him anytime soon. Mr. Lincoln wrote
and delivered the Gettysburg Address: Ditto with his second inaugural address,
which some presidential scholars consider his finest prose poem.
Mr. Malloy’s dyslexia is not a bar to wit. Perhaps Mr.
Malloy loves to work so much that he has no time for pretty or sensible formulations.
So, forget the packaging; let us examine the meat of this
sentence: “No one’s ever outworked me. So I can do more things and still get
the job done because I love to work, always have.”
It just is not true. There are possibly hundreds of people, some of them politicians, who have outworked Mr. Malloy, among them: Caligula (The Roman Republic was not
disassembled in a day, and destroying it was exhausting work); Stalin (The construction
of the Gulag Archipelago took time and
effort); Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's Republic of China (who
was responsible, though not single-handedly, of course, for the deaths of some 45 million of his countrymen); and, perhaps more pertinent to Americans, Thomas
Edison, inventor of the light bulb, who formed the Edison Portland Cement Co.
in 1899, which held patents on, among other things, cement cabinets and pianos.
Even genius sleeps from time to time, and personal energy is not always
properly or profitably directed.
Which is the point – isn’t it? Time invested in destructive
projects is time misspent. Who cares if Mr. Edison spent two or a hundred hours
inventing a cement piano? Better to pour your energy into the invention of the light bulb,
right?
Now then, Mr. Malloy has spent an inordinate amount of time
during his first term removing dollars from the private marketplace in the form
of increased taxes, collecting them, and then reallocating his swag as “investments”
in projects he deems worthy. This is what Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” – billions
of appropriations and allocations made by people who go about their daily
business getting and spending – does much better than governors and presidents
who think their own spending choices are more productive than, say, those of the
assistant to the assistant of communications who works in Mr. Malloy’s office whenever he reallocates a dollar from his salary to purchase a package of Pistachio
Biscotti from his local Whole Foods Market. No purchase is without its consequences. A dollar spent on biscotti is a dollar NOT wasted on a cement
piano.
During his second term in office, the tax starved Malloy
administration will have cement on its mind. Big allocations lay ahead. It seems that
the state’s infrastructure has been allowed to go to rack and ruin, no doubt
the fault, in Mr. Malloy's reckoning, of the governor’s two Republican
predecessors, one a criminal twice over and the other, a much less flashy administrator
than the present Big Thinker, a nice lady who was not quite as energetic a
workaholic as Mr. Malloy.
Just when everyone, consulting their own wallets and budgets
while eyeing the exit signs, thought the Malloy administration had reached a ceiling
on spending, here comes a cry for MORE. Of course, dilapidated bridges must be
fixed; so much is certain. And money must be raised and allocated in
Connecticut’s perpetually red budget to do the job – which is necessary.
However, Mr. Malloy promised on a stack of bibles during his successful
re-election campaign that he would not raise taxes. He certainly has proposed no
grand scheme to reduce spending.
So – what’s up with that? Well, you know; It depends upon
what a tax is, and whether a fee is a tax, and what spending is, and what “is”
is. Is a toll a tax? These are complex metaphysical-philosophical-political
terms a proper understanding of which some high octane politicians believe are beyond the pay grade of most voters
and taxpayers. And when Mr. Malloy and the Democratic dominated General
Assembly proposes to finance “necessary” capital expenditures, very likely by
means of borrowing, whether the money generated for the purpose will be spent
solely on capital expenditures – rather than being dumped in the General Fund
to patch future budget holes – will depend upon the proper complex
metaphysical-philosophical-political meanings attached to Mr. Malloy’s upcoming
second inaugural address before the General Assembly, which likely will call
for more spending and the dismemberment of municipal governments, the last
effective bars to controlled spending in Connecticut.
Here’s a bit of advice for the state’s reporters and
commentators: Put on your jeweler's loupe. So much to do, so little time -- better get
busy.
Comments
------------
Right; the act of working is what impresses, not necessarily the resulting accomplishment. For the managerial class in charge of operating our bureaucratic general welfare leviathan the business of government is busyness. The Protestant work ethic transferred to the secular sphere. Not critical that veterans actually get medical treatment, only that they receive a swirl of concerned-appearing activity.
----------
Since it was impossible to know who was predestined, the notion developed that it might be possible to discern that a person was elect (predestined) by observing their way of life. Hard work and frugality, as well as social success and wealth, were thought to be two important consequences of being one of the elect; Protestants were thus attracted to these qualities and supposed to strive for reaching them.
Twenty-five years after the Berlin Wall fell, and our management class seems to have learned the wrong lessons. It will not accept that markets work best, nor will they accept the inherent limitations involved in and distortions caused by government intervention. In the case of Mal-loy and his Party, both nationally and state-wise, there is a blind ideological commitment to government action per se. What is the rational argument that justifies the governmental prohibition of the Keystone pipeline? There is none, zero, nada. There may be a slightly more rational justification for Dannel's Bus, but I haven't seen it. A more critical Connecticut example has to do with one of our Bureaus of Social Justice, the Office of Health Care Access (OHCA), stepping in to prevent a commercial transaction; the purchase of five hospitals by Tenet Healthcare Corp.
I'm with the guys at "Hartford Business Journal;" make the Governor and his Party explain themselves.
------------------
With the recent decision by Tenet Healthcare Corp. to pull out of its acquisitions of five Connecticut hospitals, it's time for the Office of Health Care Access (OHCA) or Gov. Dannel P. Malloy to explain why the 47 restrictions placed on the Waterbury Hospital deal were necessary.
Those conditions, which required the appointment of an independent monitor, the freezing of pricing and staffing levels for five or more years, and the filing of strategic spending and hiring plans, mirrored some of the language initially included in bills proposed last legislative session to govern nonprofit to for-profit hospital conversions.
http://www.hartfordbusiness.com/article/20150105/PRINTEDITION/301029967